Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Impaired in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

• Published in: Medicine and science in sports and exercise Vol. 56; no. 9; pp. 1553 - 1562
• Main Authors: Alvares, Thiago S, DE Souza, Leonardo Victor Miranda, Soares, Rogério Nogueira, Lessard, Sarah J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01-09-2024
• Subjects: Cardiorespiratory Fitness; Clinical Sciences; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - physiopathology; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology; Exercise - physiology; Humans; Sedentary Behavior
• ISSN: 0195-9131; 1530-0315; 1530-0315
• DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003451

Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease by up to eightfold and is one of the strongest predictors of mortality. Some studies demonstrate impaired CRF in people living with type 1 and type 2 diabetes compared with those without diabetes, whereas others demonstrate no diabetes-associated impairment in CRF.
We aimed to determine whether diabetes can influence CRF and, if so, identify clinical associations underlying diabetes-associated exercise impairments.
Sixty-eight studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated and meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed by using a random-effects model.
Diabetes is associated with a large negative effect on CRF (SMD = -0.80, P < 0.001)-an effect that is partially mitigated, but still significant, in those with high physical activity levels (SMD = -0.50, P = 0.007). A sedentary lifestyle (SMD = -0.83, P = 0.007) and the presence of clinical complications related to diabetes (SMD = -1.66, P < 0.001) predict a greater magnitude of CRF reduction in people with diabetes compared with controls without diabetes. Both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes are independently associated with impaired CRF compared with controls without diabetes; however, the effect is significantly greater in those type 2 diabetes (SMD = -0.97, P < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis demonstrates the effects of diabetes on CRF are primarily associated with HbA1c levels for type 1 diabetes ( B = -0.07, P < 0.001) and body mass index for type 2 diabetes ( B = -0.17, P = 0.005).
These data demonstrate a negative influence of diabetes on the key risk factor of low CRF and provide critical insight into specific clinical markers of low CRF associated with diabetes.