A study of fractional CO2 laser resurfacing: the best fluences through a clinical, histological, and ultrastructural evaluation
Summary Background Fractional resurfacing is a laser treatment modality to create numerous microscopic thermal injury zones of controlled width, depth, and density that are surrounded by a reservoir of spared epidermal and dermal tissue, allowing rapid repair of laser‐induced thermal injury. Object...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cosmetic dermatology Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 210 - 216 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-09-2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Background Fractional resurfacing is a laser treatment modality to create numerous microscopic thermal injury zones of controlled width, depth, and density that are surrounded by a reservoir of spared epidermal and dermal tissue, allowing rapid repair of laser‐induced thermal injury.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fractional CO2 laser system in the treatment of photo‐damaged skin with clinical, histological, and ultrastructural evaluation, with special attention to one of the parameters of this laser system: the fluences.
Materials and methods Twelve patients with Fitzpatrick skin types II to III with photo‐damage skin underwent fractional laser treatment with one single‐pass superficial on the face and forearm. Clinical outcome and histological and ultrastructural changes were assessed.
Results Light microscopy of biopsies gave important information about skin changes at three different times after fractional treatment, especially revealing some differences between the fluences used in the three groups of patients.
Conclusion Fractional resurfacing offers significant surgical advantages allowing to achieve excellent esthetic results in balance with the biological structure. Besides, our study shows already that with 2.07 and 2.77 J/cm2, instead of 4.15 J/cm2, it is possible to reach a biological response without scar formation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:JOCD571 ark:/67375/WNG-LD5RTDDF-B istex:8696C2F2B3BEB509F54D2B00CA416DD64AFABCD6 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1473-2130 1473-2165 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00571.x |