Results of a nine-laboratory survey of forensic toxicology proficiency

Toxicological determinations are crucial to coroners' or medical examiners' judgments that drugs are significantly involved in a death. However, differences in laboratory procedures, thoroughness of screening, and limits of detection may result in artifactual differences in the toxicologic...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 22; no. 6; p. 843
Main Authors:	Dinovo, E C, Gottschalk, L A
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	England 01-06-1976
Subjects:	Ethanol - blood Forensic Medicine Glutethimide - urine Humans Narcotics - blood Pentobarbital - blood Phenobarbital - urine Poisoning - blood Poisoning - mortality Poisoning - urine Quality Control Salicylates - blood Secobarbital - blood Tranquilizing Agents - blood
Online Access:	Get more information
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Toxicological determinations are crucial to coroners' or medical examiners' judgments that drugs are significantly involved in a death. However, differences in laboratory procedures, thoroughness of screening, and limits of detection may result in artifactual differences in the toxicological results and the subsequent interpretations of them. To test this possibility, we conducted a toxicology proficiency-testing survey of nine collaborating laboratories. The results for the proficiency samples point out starting interlaboratory differences in accuracy and precision of detection of drugs. These observed variations in toxicological proficiency may introduce a significant source of error in drug-death statistics and in epidemiological deductions based on these statistics.
ISSN:	0009-9147
DOI:	10.1093/clinchem/22.6.843