Modified Mason-Allen vs Two Simple Stitch Fixation for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

• Published in: The American journal of sports medicine Vol. 52; no. 7; pp. 1877 - 1887
• Main Authors: Boksh, Khalis, Martins, Andre, Elbashir, Mohamed, Boutefnouchet, Tarek, Aujla, Randeep
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-06-2024; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Arthritis; Clinical outcomes; Humans; Menisci, Tibial - surgery; Meta-analysis; Osteoarthritis; Postoperative Complications; Suture Techniques; Systematic review; Tibial Meniscus Injuries - surgery; meniscal healing; 2 simple stitches; meniscal extrusion; medial meniscus posterior root tear; Mason-Allen
• ISSN: 0363-5465; 1552-3365; 1552-3365
• DOI: 10.1177/03635465231190650

Background:
Various suture configurations are available for medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair. The modified Mason-Allen (MMA) technique has been proposed as a refixation technique for MMPRT instead of the conventional 2 simple stitches (TSS). This is in view of its superior biomechanical characteristics.
Purpose:
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare MMA and TSS configuration techniques for MMPRT repair and identify any differences between the 2 techniques in terms of clinical outcomes, medial meniscal extrusion (MME), and postoperative healing.
Study Design:
Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria with the following search terms: (“meniscus” OR “meniscal injuries”) AND (“Mason-Allen” OR “simple stitch” OR “suture techniques”). Data pertaining to all patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, MME, postoperative healing, cartilage degeneration, and progression of knee osteoarthritis were extracted from each study. The pooled outcome data were analyzed using random- and fixed-effects models.
Results:
After abstract and full-text screening, 6 clinical studies were included. In total, there were 291 patients; 160 underwent MMA fixation, and 131 underwent the TSS technique. The majority of studies had similar surgical techniques regarding repair technique, suture material, tibial fixation, and number and position of tibial tunnels. There were no differences between the groups in terms of patient-reported outcome measures at 14.2 months. Both techniques were also similar in the degree of postoperative MME and meniscal healing.
Conclusion:
Both suture configurations were equivalent in terms of clinical outcomes, the extent of meniscal extrusion, and postoperative healing. The TSS technique may offer advantages in terms of faster learning curve and shorter operative time. However, randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes, longer follow-up and assessment of chondral degeneration, and presence of knee osteoarthritis are required to assess whether a true difference exists, as the majority of included studies were limited by their retrospective design.