Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
Background Minimally invasive spine surgery has seen rapid development in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus minimally invasive surgery transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of...
Saved in:
| Published in: | BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 938 - 14 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
21-11-2024
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Background Minimally invasive spine surgery has seen rapid development in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus minimally invasive surgery transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods In collaboration with various search terms, a comprehensive examination of the scientific literature was carried out using PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and other databases. A total of 9 studies were included retrospective cohort studies. Results We observed statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stays, and 1-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores between the ULIF and MIS-TLIF groups, with the ULIF group being more dominant. MIS-TLIF group was statistically more advantageous in terms of operative time. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, excellent and good rate, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle between the two groups. Conclusions Treatment of single-segment LDD with ULIF and MIS-TLIF is both safe and effective. ULIF has the advantage of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter total hospital stay, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower ODI scores at 1 month postoperatively compared to MIS-TLIF. There were no significant differences between ULIF and MIS-TLIF in the treatment of LDD in terms of postoperative VAS scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, satisfaction rates, fusion rates, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle. MIS-TLIF has a shorter procedure time than ULIF. Keywords: Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion, Minimally invasive surgery transforaminal interbody fusion, Lumbar degenerative disease, Meta-analysis |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Minimally invasive spine surgery has seen rapid development in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus minimally invasive surgery transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.BACKGROUNDMinimally invasive spine surgery has seen rapid development in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus minimally invasive surgery transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.In collaboration with various search terms, a comprehensive examination of the scientific literature was carried out using PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and other databases. A total of 9 studies were included retrospective cohort studies.METHODSIn collaboration with various search terms, a comprehensive examination of the scientific literature was carried out using PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and other databases. A total of 9 studies were included retrospective cohort studies.We observed statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stays, and 1-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores between the ULIF and MIS-TLIF groups, with the ULIF group being more dominant. MIS-TLIF group was statistically more advantageous in terms of operative time. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, excellent and good rate, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle between the two groups.RESULTSWe observed statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stays, and 1-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores between the ULIF and MIS-TLIF groups, with the ULIF group being more dominant. MIS-TLIF group was statistically more advantageous in terms of operative time. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, excellent and good rate, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle between the two groups.Treatment of single-segment LDD with ULIF and MIS-TLIF is both safe and effective. ULIF has the advantage of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter total hospital stay, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower ODI scores at 1 month postoperatively compared to MIS-TLIF. There were no significant differences between ULIF and MIS-TLIF in the treatment of LDD in terms of postoperative VAS scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, satisfaction rates, fusion rates, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle. MIS-TLIF has a shorter procedure time than ULIF.CONCLUSIONSTreatment of single-segment LDD with ULIF and MIS-TLIF is both safe and effective. ULIF has the advantage of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter total hospital stay, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower ODI scores at 1 month postoperatively compared to MIS-TLIF. There were no significant differences between ULIF and MIS-TLIF in the treatment of LDD in terms of postoperative VAS scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, satisfaction rates, fusion rates, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle. MIS-TLIF has a shorter procedure time than ULIF. Background Minimally invasive spine surgery has seen rapid development in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus minimally invasive surgery transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods In collaboration with various search terms, a comprehensive examination of the scientific literature was carried out using PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and other databases. A total of 9 studies were included retrospective cohort studies. Results We observed statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stays, and 1-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores between the ULIF and MIS-TLIF groups, with the ULIF group being more dominant. MIS-TLIF group was statistically more advantageous in terms of operative time. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, excellent and good rate, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle between the two groups. Conclusions Treatment of single-segment LDD with ULIF and MIS-TLIF is both safe and effective. ULIF has the advantage of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter total hospital stay, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower ODI scores at 1 month postoperatively compared to MIS-TLIF. There were no significant differences between ULIF and MIS-TLIF in the treatment of LDD in terms of postoperative VAS scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, satisfaction rates, fusion rates, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle. MIS-TLIF has a shorter procedure time than ULIF. Keywords: Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion, Minimally invasive surgery transforaminal interbody fusion, Lumbar degenerative disease, Meta-analysis Abstract Background Minimally invasive spine surgery has seen rapid development in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus minimally invasive surgery transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods In collaboration with various search terms, a comprehensive examination of the scientific literature was carried out using PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and other databases. A total of 9 studies were included retrospective cohort studies. Results We observed statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stays, and 1-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores between the ULIF and MIS-TLIF groups, with the ULIF group being more dominant. MIS-TLIF group was statistically more advantageous in terms of operative time. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, excellent and good rate, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle between the two groups. Conclusions Treatment of single-segment LDD with ULIF and MIS-TLIF is both safe and effective. ULIF has the advantage of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter total hospital stay, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower ODI scores at 1 month postoperatively compared to MIS-TLIF. There were no significant differences between ULIF and MIS-TLIF in the treatment of LDD in terms of postoperative VAS scores, 3-month postoperative and final ODI scores, satisfaction rates, fusion rates, complications, disc heights, and lumbar lordosis angle. MIS-TLIF has a shorter procedure time than ULIF. |
| ArticleNumber | 938 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Cheng, Qianyue He, Yanxing She, Jiang |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yanxing surname: He fullname: He, Yanxing – sequence: 2 givenname: Qianyue surname: Cheng fullname: Cheng, Qianyue – sequence: 3 givenname: Jiang surname: She fullname: She, Jiang |
| BookMark | eNp1kstq3TAQhk1JoUnaF-jKy26c6mJbVjclhF4CgW6atRhLI1fBlk4l-8B5sr5eJzlpSBZFCw0z_3zMDP9ZdRJTxKp6z9kF50P_sXAxaN4w0TZsYG3fsFfVKW8Vb0Sr2pNn8ZvqrJQ7xrgapD6t_tzGMMOKGeZ6DLuUVwowulRs2gVbz9syQq5DJMmY3KH2Wwkp1nvMZSv1EmJYYJ4PpNhDCXus1wyx-JSBasT6H4AUdQlxmrEpOC0Y139ShxNGGmi9p7lQEAp-qqFecIUGiHkoobytXnuYC757_M-r269ffl59b25-fLu-urxprBg4a5TynXJs7IVSyLSwnZN0JOF8zzV2TI7IpNScCxCeacs0VXtvO-21lADyvLo-cl2CO7PLtG0-mATBPCRSngzkNdgZjWSDHcQokGHfOgTtXauEUB1gC6CRWJ-PrN02Lugs7UxnfwF9WYnhl5nS3nDeDUwwTYQPj4Scfm9YVrOEYnGeIWLaipFc8qETfS9JenGUTkCzhegTIS09h0uw5B4fKH85cMXpDJxTgzg22JxKyeifBuPM3JvMHE1m6ELmwWSGyb_9Fcz9 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.087 10.1001/jama.2022.5921 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.071 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.043 10.1155/2020/8815432 10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.248 10.3171/2020.6.SPINE20586 10.1007/s10143-019-01114-3 10.1155/2022/9389239 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.059 10.1007/s007760200084 10.21037/jss.2019.09.29 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4e3be 10.3389/fsurg.2021.723200.Erratumfor:FrontSurg.2021Feb26;7:596327 10.1186/s13018-018-0725-1 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17146 10.1136/bmj.b2700 10.1177/2192568219882344 10.1097/00007632-197812000-00004 10.1016/j.nec.2019.02.007 10.1186/s13018-024-04806-9 10.1007/s00586-010-1404-z 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001024 10.1186/s12891-023-06374-1 10.1186/s13018-023-04401-4 10.1016/j.jos.2022.10.019 10.2147/JPR.S371635 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.151 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.006 10.21037/jss.2020.03.08 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101592 10.12659/MSM.912808 10.3389/fsurg.2022.873691 10.14245/ns.2040178.089 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.013 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. 2024. The Author(s). The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12891-024-08046-0 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
| EISSN | 1471-2474 |
| EndPage | 14 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_308c82b2e0e64dea9fd472275ae4aa9e A817150311 10_1186_s12891_024_08046_0 |
| GroupedDBID | --- -A0 0R~ 23N 2WC 3V. 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACRMQ ADBBV ADINQ ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2810-77f57d0b6277e092c5d30242df619e503be0339112a2f09c090246fc59f933aa3 |
| IEDL.DBID | RPM |
| ISSN | 1471-2474 |
| IngestDate | Mon Nov 25 20:28:41 EST 2024 Fri Nov 22 06:57:53 EST 2024 Sun Nov 24 17:44:32 EST 2024 Tue Nov 26 04:04:08 EST 2024 Wed Nov 27 13:01:53 EST 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2810-77f57d0b6277e092c5d30242df619e503be0339112a2f09c090246fc59f933aa3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580209/ |
| PQID | 3131852663 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 14 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_308c82b2e0e64dea9fd472275ae4aa9e pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11580209 proquest_miscellaneous_3131852663 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A817150311 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_024_08046_0 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20241121 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-11-21 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2024 text: 20241121 day: 21 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC musculoskeletal disorders |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | J Heemskerk (8046_CR4) 2021; 21 A Liberati (8046_CR16) 2009; 21 JE Kim (8046_CR1) 2021; 34 L Chen (8046_CR40) 2022; 29 Y He (8046_CR17) 2024; 29 S Phani Kiran (8046_CR6) 2021; 8 Y Yang (8046_CR23) 2023; 37 AR Gatam (8046_CR32) 2021; 13 X Huang (8046_CR9) 2023; 24 M Kang (8046_CR7) 2021; 21 T Kang (8046_CR42) 2020; 34 J Chao (8046_CR19) 2022; 44 Y Kang (8046_CR21) 2023; 63 W Hua (8046_CR36) 2021; 30 S Kim (8046_CR38) 2018; 13 V Katuch (8046_CR3) 2021; 122 CM Choi (8046_CR43) 2020; 6 J Katz (8046_CR2) 2022; 327 W Kirkaldy-Willis (8046_CR25) 1978; 3 C Peng (8046_CR28) 2009; 34 J Kim (8046_CR34) 2020; 2020 X Song (8046_CR20) 2023; 173 R Pranata (8046_CR37) 2020; 138 M Karsy (8046_CR26) 2019; 30 J Pao (8046_CR33) 2020; 6 D He (8046_CR13) 2023; 173 G Lin (8046_CR39) 2022; 160 Y Kawaguchi (8046_CR41) 2002; 7 W Guo (8046_CR18) 2023; 18 JE Kim (8046_CR10) 2018; 10 B An (8046_CR5) 2024; 19 G Gao (8046_CR31) 2022; 2022 Y Qi (8046_CR22) 2023; 21 J Wang (8046_CR29) 2010; 19 B Zheng (8046_CR14) 2023; 24 Z Yihao (8046_CR24) 2023; 44 C Kim (8046_CR27) 2020; 10 J Zhao (8046_CR30) 2018; 1 Q Han (8046_CR8) 2022; 29 D Heo (8046_CR12) 2017; 43 S Ao (8046_CR35) 2020; 76 Y Yu (8046_CR11) 2023; 37 D Heo (8046_CR15) 2020; 17 M Park (8046_CR44) 2019; 42 |
| References_xml | – volume: 173 start-page: e509 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR13 publication-title: World Neurosurg doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.087 contributor: fullname: D He – volume: 327 start-page: 1688 issue: 17 year: 2022 ident: 8046_CR2 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5921 contributor: fullname: J Katz – volume: 160 start-page: 55 year: 2022 ident: 8046_CR39 publication-title: World Neurosurg doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.071 contributor: fullname: G Lin – volume: 76 start-page: 136 year: 2020 ident: 8046_CR35 publication-title: Int J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.043 contributor: fullname: S Ao – volume: 2020 start-page: 8815432 year: 2020 ident: 8046_CR34 publication-title: Biomed Res Int doi: 10.1155/2020/8815432 contributor: fullname: J Kim – volume: 10 start-page: 248 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 8046_CR10 publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.248 contributor: fullname: JE Kim – volume: 37 start-page: 52 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR11 publication-title: Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi contributor: fullname: Y Yu – volume: 37 start-page: 52 issue: 01 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR23 publication-title: Chin J Reconstruct Reconstruct Surg contributor: fullname: Y Yang – volume: 34 start-page: 196 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 8046_CR42 publication-title: J Neurosurg Spine doi: 10.3171/2020.6.SPINE20586 contributor: fullname: T Kang – volume: 42 start-page: 753 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 8046_CR44 publication-title: Neurosurg Rev doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01114-3 contributor: fullname: M Park – volume: 2022 start-page: 9389239 year: 2022 ident: 8046_CR31 publication-title: J Healthc Eng doi: 10.1155/2022/9389239 contributor: fullname: G Gao – volume: 173 start-page: e371 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR20 publication-title: World Neurosurg doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.059 contributor: fullname: X Song – volume: 7 start-page: 483 issue: 4 year: 2002 ident: 8046_CR41 publication-title: J Orthop Sci doi: 10.1007/s007760200084 contributor: fullname: Y Kawaguchi – volume: 6 start-page: 457 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 8046_CR43 publication-title: J Spine Surg doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.29 contributor: fullname: CM Choi – volume: 34 start-page: 1385 issue: 13 year: 2009 ident: 8046_CR28 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4e3be contributor: fullname: C Peng – volume: 30 start-page: 723200 issue: 8 year: 2021 ident: 8046_CR36 publication-title: Front Surg doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.723200.Erratumfor:FrontSurg.2021Feb26;7:596327 contributor: fullname: W Hua – volume: 63 start-page: 71 issue: 08 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR21 publication-title: Shandong Med contributor: fullname: Y Kang – volume: 13 start-page: 22 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 8046_CR38 publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0725-1 contributor: fullname: S Kim – volume: 43 start-page: E8 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 8046_CR12 publication-title: Neurosurg Focus doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17146 contributor: fullname: D Heo – volume: 21 start-page: b2700 issue: 339 year: 2009 ident: 8046_CR16 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700 contributor: fullname: A Liberati – volume: 13 start-page: 229 year: 2021 ident: 8046_CR32 publication-title: Orthop Res Rev contributor: fullname: AR Gatam – volume: 10 start-page: 143S issue: 2 Suppl year: 2020 ident: 8046_CR27 publication-title: Global Spine J doi: 10.1177/2192568219882344 contributor: fullname: C Kim – volume: 3 start-page: 319 issue: 4 year: 1978 ident: 8046_CR25 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/00007632-197812000-00004 contributor: fullname: W Kirkaldy-Willis – volume: 30 start-page: 333 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 8046_CR26 publication-title: Neurosurg Clin N Am doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2019.02.007 contributor: fullname: M Karsy – volume: 44 start-page: 10 issue: 09 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR24 publication-title: J Med Forum contributor: fullname: Z Yihao – volume: 19 start-page: 317 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 8046_CR5 publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04806-9 contributor: fullname: B An – volume: 19 start-page: 1780 issue: 10 year: 2010 ident: 8046_CR29 publication-title: Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1404-z contributor: fullname: J Wang – volume: 34 start-page: E64 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 8046_CR1 publication-title: Clin Spine Surg doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001024 contributor: fullname: JE Kim – volume: 24 start-page: 274 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR9 publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06374-1 contributor: fullname: X Huang – volume: 18 start-page: 943 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR18 publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04401-4 contributor: fullname: W Guo – volume: 29 start-page: 49 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 8046_CR17 publication-title: J Orthop Sci doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.10.019 contributor: fullname: Y He – volume: 29 start-page: 1271 issue: 15 year: 2022 ident: 8046_CR8 publication-title: J Pain Res doi: 10.2147/JPR.S371635 contributor: fullname: Q Han – volume: 138 start-page: e450 year: 2020 ident: 8046_CR37 publication-title: World Neurosurg doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.151 contributor: fullname: R Pranata – volume: 21 start-page: 2049 issue: 12 year: 2021 ident: 8046_CR4 publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.006 contributor: fullname: J Heemskerk – volume: 21 start-page: 236 issue: 04 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR22 publication-title: J Spine Surg contributor: fullname: Y Qi – volume: 6 start-page: 438 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 8046_CR33 publication-title: J Spine Surg doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.03.08 contributor: fullname: J Pao – volume: 44 start-page: 563 issue: 04 year: 2022 ident: 8046_CR19 publication-title: J Chin Acad Med Sci contributor: fullname: J Chao – volume: 8 start-page: 101592 issue: 22 year: 2021 ident: 8046_CR6 publication-title: J Clin Orthop Trauma doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101592 contributor: fullname: S Phani Kiran – volume: 1 start-page: 8693 issue: 24 year: 2018 ident: 8046_CR30 publication-title: Med Sci Monit doi: 10.12659/MSM.912808 contributor: fullname: J Zhao – volume: 122 start-page: 653 issue: 9 year: 2021 ident: 8046_CR3 publication-title: Bratisl Lek Listy contributor: fullname: V Katuch – volume: 29 start-page: 873691 issue: 9 year: 2022 ident: 8046_CR40 publication-title: Front Surg doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.873691 contributor: fullname: L Chen – volume: 24 start-page: e395 issue: 6 year: 2023 ident: 8046_CR14 publication-title: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) contributor: fullname: B Zheng – volume: 17 start-page: S129 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2020 ident: 8046_CR15 publication-title: Neurospine doi: 10.14245/ns.2040178.089 contributor: fullname: D Heo – volume: 21 start-page: 2066 issue: 12 year: 2021 ident: 8046_CR7 publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.013 contributor: fullname: M Kang |
| SSID | ssj0017839 |
| Score | 2.4491 |
| Snippet | Background Minimally invasive spine surgery has seen rapid development in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of unilateral... Minimally invasive spine surgery has seen rapid development in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of unilateral biportal... Abstract Background Minimally invasive spine surgery has seen rapid development in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database |
| StartPage | 938 |
| SubjectTerms | Care and treatment Diseases Evidence-based medicine Lumbar degenerative disease Meta-analysis Minimally invasive surgery transforaminal interbody fusion Systematic Review Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nj9QwDI1gT1wQy4IYvhQkBAcUbZukTcJtgF3tiQsgcYucJl1G6nTQzhRpftn-Pey0XTEgxIVra1Vp7NjPif3C2EsMWiEEB8JokEJHC8IiMBaVC62JVVPUgbYGLj6Zj1_thzOiybm56otqwkZ64HHiTlVhGyuDTEWqdUzg2kj8hqaCpAFcyt63qOdkajo_MBj35xYZW59u0QtThY_UAhGSxhz6IAxltv4_ffLvdZK_BJ7ze-zuhBj5chzpMbuV-vvsZNljtrze81c813DmzfETdo0QsgNqKu54WI3Qmqc-bqj5ZNVw9EQBrvgqz-Ym7nk70G4Zp9qMYcuJZ2QNXbdHiR9Ahe18NwFbyJd__fUDKMFp16FLYpsuacdxFo3pMjNbk1vl03HQWw58nXYgYKJEecC-nJ99fn8hpqsZRCMtem5j2srEItTSmFQ42VRRUbSPLSZkqSpUSIVS6EglyLZwDVV_6rptKtc6pQDUQ3bUb_r0iPHQljVUTQoQjY4QQquMdqhoHQDNpViwN7Om_PeRgcPnzMXWftSrx2_7rFeP0u9ImTeSxJ6dH6BN-cmm_L9sasFekyl4WuM4zQ1MrQo4YGLL8ktbGgTSqiwX7MVsLR7XJR22QJ82w9arMvelI6BbMHtgRgdjO3zTr75lhm-E6RZxvHv8P_7mCbsjyfLLUsjyKTvaXQ3pGbu9jcPzvGh-Am6mJAU priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Title | Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3131852663 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11580209 https://doaj.org/article/308c82b2e0e64dea9fd472275ae4aa9e |
| Volume | 25 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELbonrggYEGUR2UkBAeUbWInscOtLLtahEBIgMTNGj9SKqXJqm2Q-sv4e8y4CaIgLlyTSWLZ45lvxjNfGHuGTstaW0GichBJ7jUkGoFxUlS2Vr5waWkpNXD1SX34qt9cEE1OOfbCxKJ9Z1dnbbM-a1ffYm3l9drNxzqx-cf354hiNMKcaj5hEwSHY4w-nB0o9Plje4wu51u0wFTdI_IE0VGO8fORC4pM_X_b4z9rJH9zOpe32a0BLfLFYVR32I3Q3mWnixYj5fWeP-exfjMmxk_ZD4SPDVBDccPt6gCreWh9R40nK8fRClnY8FWcyc7ved1TpoxTXUa_5cQxsoam2aPEd6Cidr4bQC3EH3_98wUowSnj0IRkG5aUbRxFfVhGVmsyqXw4CnrFga_DDhIY6FDusS-XF5_Pr5LhtwyJExqttlJ1oXxqS6FUSCvhCi_J0_sag7FQpNKGVEo0ogJEnVaOKj_zsnZFVVdSAsj77KTt2vCAcVtnJRQuWPAq92BtLVVeBahyC6gq6ZS9HFfKXB_YN0yMWnRpDutq8N0mrqtB6de0mL8kiTk7Xug2SzPoj5GpdlpYEdJQ5h4_VXviy1QFhBygClP2glTB0P7GaXYwtCnggIkpyyx0phBEyyybsqejthjck3TQAm3o-q2RWexJRzA3ZfpIjY7GdnwHlT2ye4_K_fD_H33EbgrS9yxLRPaYnew2fXjCJlvfzzBqePtuFjMPs7htfgLxISQ7 |
| link.rule.ids | 230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2106,27933,27934,53800,53802 |
| linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
| linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELbY5QAXXgva8jQSggPK1rGT2OFWll0VsbtCYpG4WePYKZXSdNUHUn8Zf48ZN0EUxGWvyTSx6vH4m_E3Xxh7hZuWc66ERGcgk8wbSAwC4yQvXa19XonCUWlg_EVffDMfTkgmp-h7YSJpv3LTo7aZHbXT75FbeTWrhj1PbPj5_BhRjEGYUw732E1csEL0WXp3eqBx1-8bZEwxXGIMJn6PzBLERxlm0DubUNTq_zci_82S_GPbOb173QHfY3c6oMlH2_v32Y3QPmAHoxaT7NmGv-aR-hlr6gfsJyLPBqgXueFuukXkPLR-Tj0r04pjAHOw4NM4CXO_4fWaimycKB3rJSd5khk0zQYtfgDx4fmqw8MQvxn23wegBadiRROSZZhQobI39WESBbEpGvPuFOkdBz4LK0igU1J5yL6enlwej5Puiw5JJQ0GfK3rXHvhCql1EKWscq8IJPga87iQC-WCUArjrwRZi7Ii0mhW1FVe1qVSAOoR22_nbThk3NVpAXkVHHideXCuVjorA5SZA_QyMWBv-ym2V1vhDhsTHlPYrUNYfLaNDmHR-j15wW9LEt2OF-aLie1m0iphKiOdDCIUmcdX1Z6kNnUOIQMow4C9IR-yFBrwb66g63DAAZPIlh2ZVCP-Vmk6YC97N7O4nOmMBtowXy-tSmM7O-LAATM7_rcztt076HZRGLx3s8fX_-kLdmt8eX5mzz5efHrCbktaNGmayPQp218t1uEZ21v69fO43n4BEW44AA |
| linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zj9MwELbYRUK8cC1oy2kkBA8o28Q57Oxb2UOLgNVKgMSbNb5KpTSteiD1l_H3mHETREG8wGs6Tax4PP5m_M0Xxl7gpmWMqSGRBYikcAoShcA4KWsTpCttWhkqDVx8lJdf1OkZyeQc970wkbRvzeSobaZH7eRr5FbOp3bY88SGVx9OEMUohDn1cO7CcI9dx0Wbij5T704QJO78fZOMqoZLjMPE8RFFghipwCx6ZyOKev1_RuXfmZK_bD3nt_9n0HfYrQ5w8tHW5i675tt77GDUYrI93fCXPFJAY239gH1HBNoA9SQ33Ey2yJz71s2od2ViOQYyAws-iZMxcxse1lRs40TtWC85yZRMoWk2aPENiBfPVx0uhvjtsL_eAC04FS0anyz9mAqWvanz4yiMTVGZd6dJxxz41K8ggU5R5T77fH726eQi6b7skFihMPBLGUrpUlMJKX1aC1u6nMCCC5jP-TLNjU_zHOOwABHS2hJ5tKiCLetQ5zlA_oDtt7PWHzJuQlZBab0BJwsHxoRcFrWHujCA3pYO2Ot-mvV8K-ChY-KjKr11Co331tEpNFq_IU_4aUni2_HCbDHW3WzqPFVWCSN86qvC4aOCI8lNWYIvAGo_YK_IjzSFCHzNFrpOBxwwiW3pkcok4vA8ywbsee9qGpc1ndVA62frpc6z2NaOeHDA1I4P7oxt9xd0vSgQ3rvaw3__6zN24-r0XL9_e_nuEbspaN1kWSKyx2x_tVj7J2xv6dZP45L7AYwhOoA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unilateral+biportal+endoscopic+lumbar+interbody+fusion+versus+minimally+invasive+transforaminal+lumbar+interbody+fusion+for+single-segment+lumbar+degenerative+disease%3A+a+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=BMC+musculoskeletal+disorders&rft.au=He%2C+Yanxing&rft.au=Cheng%2C+Qianyue&rft.au=She%2C+Jiang&rft.date=2024-11-21&rft.issn=1471-2474&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12891-024-08046-0&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |