An exploration of litigants’ interactions with court actors in Ghanaian courts

Studies have sought to understand the experiences of litigants who use the court system. However, very few have looked at their specific interactions with court actors in Sub-Saharan African countries. In this study, we sought to explore the interactions that litigants have with lawyers, judges, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forensic science international. Mind and law Vol. 4; p. 100119
Main Authors: Kwakye-Nuako, Charlotte Omane, Parimah, Feikoab, Davour, Makafui Jonas, Owusu Ansah, Kenneth, Adade, Abigail, Adih, Prince, Ross, Audrey Nyameye
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 01-12-2023
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Studies have sought to understand the experiences of litigants who use the court system. However, very few have looked at their specific interactions with court actors in Sub-Saharan African countries. In this study, we sought to explore the interactions that litigants have with lawyers, judges, and court workers during the process of civil litigation in Ghana. The study used a qualitative phenomenological design and a criterion sampling technique to select seventeen litigants involved in civil litigation in a Ghanaian court. Using thematic analysis, we found that litigants had confidence in the judicial system. In terms of lawyers and court actors, the participants were ambivalent about their interactions with them. Whereas some had been supportive, others drained their resources and were not altogether altruistic. We discuss these findings and make recommendations for improving litigant experiences. •This study explored the interactions that litigants have with court actors in Ghana.•Seventeen litigants were interviewed in the Law Court Complex in Accra, Ghana using a qualitative approach.•Themes such as confidence in judicial system, ambivalent views on court workers, and lawyer-client relationship were extracted.
ISSN:2666-3538
2666-3538
DOI:10.1016/j.fsiml.2023.100119