Umbrella review protocol: Global burden and risk factors of erectile dysfunction in diabetic population

• Published in: Health science reports Vol. 7; no. 6; pp. e2159 - n/a
• Main Authors: Kitaw, Tegene Atamenta, Abate, Biruk Beletew, Tilahun, Befkad Derese, Yilak, Gizachew, Haile, Ribka Nigatu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-06-2024
• Subjects: associated risk factors; Diabetes; diabetic patients; Erectile dysfunction; global burden; Meta-analysis; Patients; Penis; protocol; Quality of life; Risk factors; Sexual disorders; Systematic review; associated risk factors; protocol; diabetic patients; global burden; erectile dysfunction
• ISSN: 2398-8835; 2398-8835
• DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2159

Background
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is no longer a whisper in the shadows; it's a rising tide threatening the sexual health of millions of men in different regions. This worrying trend shows no signs of slowing down, with projections claiming a staggering 322 million men globally could be affected in the near future. In the cases of diabetes, the condition worsens and has a potent cocktail of physical and psychological distress, chipping away at men's confidence, self‐esteem, and mental health. This urgent issue demands immediate attention and action. Thus, this umbrella review intended to estimate the current burden of ED and associated risk factors among diabetic patients in the global context.
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines will be searched for relevant Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis studies in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the new regress tool, the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 tool. To estimate the pooled prevalence of ED, we will employ a weighted inverse variance random‐effects model. We will further conduct subgroup analyses, assess heterogeneity and publication bias, and perform sensitivity analyses to strengthen the robustness of our findings. Prediction intervals will also calculated to estimate the range within which future observations will likely fall. In all statistical analyses, the statistical significance will be declared at p value < 0.05.
Discussion
This umbrella review of systemic review and meta‐analysis will be the first to systematically explore and integrate evidence regarding the burden of ED and associated risk factors in the diabetic population in a global context. By estimating the worldwide burden and identifying risk factors of ED in this population, the study will contribute to uncovering the hidden burden. Thereby, the issue will get international attention to reduce its consequences on the sexual health of the diabetic population. Besides, it will also provide input and direction for future research outlook.