Clinical questions in the Japanese Urological Association's 2024 clinical practice guidelines for urethral strictures

• Published in: International journal of urology Vol. 31; no. 9; pp. 956 - 967
• Main Authors: Horiguchi, Akio, Shinchi, Masayuki, Hirano, Yusuke, Asanuma, Hiroshi, Ishiura, Yoshiyuki, Inoue, Koji, Kanematsu, Akihiro, Tabei, Tadashi, Tamura, Yoshimi, Nakajima, Yosuke, Moriya, Kimihiko, Yagihashi, Yusuke, Fukagai, Takashi, Fujii, Yasuhisa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Australia Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-09-2024
• Subjects: Clinical medicine; Emergency medical care; guideline; Humans; Japan; Patients; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Stricture; systematic review; transurethral treatment; Urethra - surgery; urethral stricture; Urethral Stricture - surgery; Urethral Stricture - therapy; urethroplasty; Urology; Urology - standards; Japan; urethral stricture; urethroplasty; systematic review; guideline; transurethral treatment
• ISSN: 0919-8172; 1442-2042; 1442-2042
• DOI: 10.1111/iju.15512

Transurethral procedures such as direct vision internal urethrotomy and urethral dilation have been the traditional treatments for urethral strictures. However, transurethral procedures are associated with high recurrence rates, resulting in many uncured cases and prompting major international urological societies to recommend urethroplasty as the standard treatment owing to its high success rate. In contrast, many Japanese general urologists have little doubts about treating urethral strictures with transurethral treatment. Therefore, urethral stricture treatments in Japan are not in line with those used in other countries. To address this, the Trauma, Emergency Medicine, and Reconstruction Subcommittee of the Japanese Urological Association has developed guidelines to offer standardized treatment protocols for urethral stricture, based on international evidence and tailored to Japan's medical landscape. These guidelines target patients with a clinically suspected urethral stricture and are intended for urologists and general practitioners involved in its diagnosis and treatment. Following the Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual 2020, the committee identified eight critical clinical issues and formulated eight clinical questions using the “patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome” format. A comprehensive literature search was conducted. For six clinical questions addressed by the existing guidelines or systematic reviews, the level of evidence was determined by qualitative systematic reviews. Quantitative systematic reviews and meta‐analyses were performed for the two unique clinical questions. The recommendation grades were determined using the Delphi method and consensus by the committee. These guidelines will be useful to clinicians in daily practice, especially those involved in the care of urethral strictures.