Stop the rot. Enzyme inactivation at brain harvest prevents artifacts: A guide for preservation of the in vivo concentrations of brain constituents

• Published in: Journal of neurochemistry Vol. 158; no. 5; pp. 1007 - 1031
• Main Author: Dienel, Gerald A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-09-2021
• Subjects: Amino acids; Brain; Complications; Energy metabolism; Enzymatic activity; Enzyme activity; Enzymes; Glucose metabolism; Inactivation; Ionization; Lipid metabolism; Lipids; Mass spectrometry; Mass spectroscopy; Medical imaging; Metabolism; Metabolites; Metabolomics; Neuroimaging; Neuropeptides; Phosphoproteins; Rot; Scientific imaging; Spectroscopy; mass spectrometry; post-mortem interval; labile metabolites; metabolomics; post-mortem ischemia
• ISSN: 0022-3042; 1471-4159
• DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15293

Post-mortem metabolism is widely recognized to cause rapid and prolonged changes in the concentrations of multiple classes of compounds in brain, that is, they are labile. Post-mortem changes from levels in living brain include components of pathways of metabolism of glucose and energy compounds, amino acids, lipids, signaling molecules, neuropeptides, phosphoproteins, and proteins. Methods that stop enzyme activity at brain harvest were developed almost 50 years ago and have been extensively used in studies of brain functions and diseases. Unfortunately, these methods are not commonly used to harvest brain tissue for mass spectrometry-based metabolomic studies or for imaging mass spectrometry studies (IMS, also called mass spectrometry imaging, MSI, or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-MSI, MALDI-MSI). Instead these studies commonly kill animals, decapitate, dissect out brain and regions of interest if needed, then 'snap' freeze the tissue to stop enzymatic activity after harvest, with post-mortem intervals typically ranging from ~0.5 to 3 min. To increase awareness of the importance of stopping metabolism at harvest and preventing the unnecessary complications of not doing so, this commentary provides examples of labile metabolites and the magnitudes of their post-mortem changes in concentrations during brain harvest. Brain harvest methods that stop metabolism at harvest eliminate post-mortem enzymatic activities and can improve characterization of normal and diseased brain. In addition, metabolomic studies would be improved by reporting absolute units of concentration along with normalized peak areas or fold changes. Then reported values can be evaluated and compared with the extensive neurochemical literature to help prevent reporting of artifactual data.