Effectiveness of an early versus a conservative invasive treatment strategy in acute coronary syndromes: a nationwide cohort study

• Published in: Annals of internal medicine Vol. 163; no. 10; pp. 737 - 746
• Main Authors: Hansen, Kim Wadt, Sorensen, Rikke, Madsen, Mette, Madsen, Jan Kyst, Jensen, Jan Skov, von Kappelgaard, Lene Mia, Mortensen, Poul Erik, Lange, Theis, Galatius, Soren
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American College of Physicians 17-11-2015
• Subjects: Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnostic imaging; Acute Coronary Syndrome - mortality; Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy; Acute coronary syndromes; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Catheterization; Cause of Death; Clinical trials; Comparative analysis; Coronary Angiography; Denmark - epidemiology; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Time Factors
• DOI: 10.7326/M15-0303
• EISSN: 1539-3704
• ISSN: 0003-4819

Randomized clinical trials have found that early invasive strategies reduce mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and rehospitalization compared with a conservative invasive approach in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), but the effectiveness of such strategies in real-world settings is unknown.
To investigate adverse cardiovascular outcomes of an early versus a conservative invasive strategy in a national cohort of patients with ACSs.
Retrospective cohort study.
Administrative health care data on hospitalizations, procedures, and outcomes abstracted from the Danish national registries and covering all acute invasive procedures in patients presenting with an ACS.
19 704 propensity score-matched patients hospitalized with a first ACS between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2011.
Risk for cardiac death or rehospitalization for MI within 60 days of hospitalization.
Compared with a conservative approach, early invasive strategies were associated with a lower risk for cardiac death (cumulative incidence, 5.9% vs. 7.6%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.84]; P < 0.001). Similar results were found for rehospitalization for MI (cumulative incidence, 3.4% vs. 5.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.67 [CI, 0.58 to 0.77]; P < 0.001) and all-cause death (cumulative incidence, 7.3% vs. 10.6%; adjusted HR, 0.65 [CI, 0.59 to 0.72]; P < 0.001).
Potential residual confounding due to lack of core clinical variables.
In this real-world cohort of patients with a first hospitalization for an ACS, the use of an early invasive treatment strategy was associated with a lower risk for cardiac death and rehospitalization for MI compared with a conservative invasive approach.
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Gentofte.