Paramedian Forehead Flap for the Reconstruction of Extensive Nasal Defects

• Published in: Actas dermo-sifiliográficas (English ed.) Vol. 102; no. 3; pp. 187 - 192
• Main Authors: Belmar, P, de Eusebio, E, Sánchez, C, Vergara, A, Martín, A, Juanes, A, Jiménez, E, Diez, E, Pastor, M.A, Olivares, M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Spanish
• Published: Spain Elsevier España 2011
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery; Colgajo fronto-nasal paramedial; Dermatology; Esthetics; Female; Forehead - surgery; Humans; Internal Medicine; Male; Middle Aged; Mohs Surgery - adverse effects; Nariz; Nasal reconstruction; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery; Nose; Nose Deformities, Acquired - etiology; Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery; Nose Neoplasms - surgery; Paramedian forehead flap; Patient Satisfaction; Reconstrucción nasal; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms - surgery; Surgical Flaps; Nariz; Nasal reconstruction; Colgajo fronto-nasal paramedial; Nose; Paramedian forehead flap; Reconstrucción nasal
• ISSN: 1578-2190; 2173-5778; 1578-2190
• DOI: 10.1016/S1578-2190(11)70783-1

Abstract Background The Department of Dermatology at Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara in Spain is a referral center for Mohs micrographic surgery. Consequently, we are regularly faced with the problem of repairing large surgical defects on the nose. The paramedian forehead flap is currently one of the techniques of choice for the repair of such defects. Materials and methods We review our experience in the repair of nasal defects using the paramedian forehead flap over the period from 2004 to 2008. We describe the surgical technique, complications, and final results. Results Ten patients (mean age, 75.1 years) were treated using this flap. Two patients also required cartilage grafts and reconstruction of the internal nasal lining. The most common complications were bleeding (60%) and partial necrosis (10%). The final cosmetic and functional results were considered good or excellent in 90% of cases. Conclusions The forehead flap continues to be one of the best options for the closure of surgical defects of the nasal pyramid larger than 2 cm. Adequate knowledge and careful application of the technique allows excellent results to be obtained with few complications.