Comparison of biomechanical analysis of four different tibial tunnel fixations in a bovine model

• Published in: The knee Vol. 38; pp. 193 - 200
• Main Authors: Erpala, Firat, Ozturk, Tahir, Burtac Eren, Mehmet, Ertem, Hakan, Cagatay Zengin, Eyup
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01-10-2022
• Subjects: Anterior cruciate ligament; Biomechanical analysis; Hamstring graft; Tibial fixation; Biomechanical analysis; Hamstring graft; Anterior cruciate ligament; Tibial fixation
• ISSN: 0968-0160; 1873-5800
• DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.08.015

To determine the ideal fixation technique for an ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft, multiple studies have been undertaken to define the initial biomechanical properties of tibial fixation.
The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of tibial fixation methods by creating single or hybrid systems.
Bovine tibias and forefoot digital extensor tendons were prepared with four different tibial anterior cruciate ligament fixation methods and compared biomechanically. Fixation materials included polyethylene Ultrabraid high-strength sutures, Biosure interference screws (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA), staples (Smith and Nephew, Richards Regular Fixation Staples without Spikes, Memphis, TN, USA), and knotless suture anchors (Multifix-S PEEK) (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA). Four groups (n = 5 specimens) were established – group I: single fixation with interference screws; group II: single fixation with knotless anchors; group III: hybrid fixation with interference screws and staples; group IV: hybrid fixation with interference screws and knotless anchors. Each specimen underwent evaluations for cyclic displacement, cyclic stiffness, initial loading strength, ultimate failure load, pull-out displacement, and pull-out stiffness.
All specimens completed cyclic loading and load-to-failure. The cyclic displacement in group II, which had a single fixation, indicated significantly greater elongation compared with the other groups (P = 0.002). The hybrid systems were more rigid than the single systems in terms of cyclic stiffness, and no statistically significant difference was observed between the hybrid systems (P = 0.461). Group IV was significantly superior in terms of the ultimate failure load (P = 0.004). No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups for pull-out displacement or pull-out stiffness.
Single fixation with bioscrews as an in-tunnel tibia fixation method was as successful as hybrid systems. Multifix-S PEEK knotless suture anchors, which can be combined with bioscrews, can be a superior fixation alternative due to its flexibility and ultimate failure load values.