Co-representation of human-generated actions vs. machine-generated actions: Impact on our sense of we-agency?
Many studies suggest that individuals are not able to build a sense of we-agency during joint actions with automated artificial systems. We sought to examine whether or not this lack of sense of control was linked with individuals' inability to represent automaton-generated action into their ow...
Saved in:
Published in: | 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) pp. 341 - 345 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
01-08-2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Many studies suggest that individuals are not able to build a sense of we-agency during joint actions with automated artificial systems. We sought to examine whether or not this lack of sense of control was linked with individuals' inability to represent automaton-generated action into their own cognitive system. Indeed, during human interactions, we automatically represent our partner's actions in our own sensorimotor system. This might sustain our capacity to build a sense of we-agency over our partner-generated actions. However, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated the potential relation between our ability to use our sensorimotor system to represent a partner's action and we-agency. Our approach consisted in performing a pilot study coupling together a Simon target detection task wherein RTs served as an index of action co-representation and an implicit measure of one's sense of agency as indicated by intentional binding phenomenon. The preliminary observations suggested that individuals could represent other-generated action and have a sense of agency over these actions provided that their partner was another human and not an artificial automated system. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1944-9437 |
DOI: | 10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172324 |