Prehospital tracheal intubating conditions during rapid sequence intubation: Rocuronium versus vecuronium

Introduction: The study purpose was to evaluate tracheal intubating conditions and cardiovascular effects of rocuronium and vecuronium (vec) in the transport setting. Methods: A prospective blinded study of adult patients requiring emergency rapid sequence oral tracheal intubation using direct laryn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Air medical journal Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 26 - 32
Main Authors: Smith, Charles E., Kovach, Betty, Polk, James D., Hagen, Joan F., Fallon, William F.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: The study purpose was to evaluate tracheal intubating conditions and cardiovascular effects of rocuronium and vecuronium (vec) in the transport setting. Methods: A prospective blinded study of adult patients requiring emergency rapid sequence oral tracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy. Patients received equipotent doses of roc 1.0 mg/kg (n=44) or vec 0.15 mg/kg (n=56) on an alternate day basis. Results: Intubation was successful in 95% of patients in the vec group and 100% in the roc group. The percentage of patients having good or excellent jaw relaxation and vocal cord exposure was similar between groups (vec/79%, roc/77%). Eleven patients (vec/7, roc/4) had difficult intubation as evidenced by Grade III or IV view and more than three attempts. Five patients in the vec group had inadequate neuromuscular blockade versus 1 patient in the roc group ( P=0.17). No cardiovascular differences occurred between groups after intubation. Conclusion: Tracheal intubating conditions and clinical evidence of complete neuromuscular blockade tended to be better after roc than after vec.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1067-991X
1532-6497
DOI:10.1067/mmj.2002.121713