Clinical and Structural Results Following Arthroscopic and Open Repair of Isolated Subscapularis Tears
Objective: With advances in techniques, arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and structural results of arthroscopic repair versus the gold standard of open repair. It is a prospec...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 13; no. 21; p. 6589 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Basel
MDPI AG
01-11-2024
MDPI |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Objective: With advances in techniques, arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and structural results of arthroscopic repair versus the gold standard of open repair. It is a prospective cohort study with a control group; evidence level III. Methods: In a prospective study performed at two centers, 18 patients with an isolated subscapularis tear were treated with arthroscopic repair (ARG) and 16 patients with open repair (ORG) using a uniform single-row suture anchor repair technique in both groups. The subscapularis function was assessed using specific clinical tests (belly-press and lift-off tests), strength testing and shoulder function with the use of the Constant–Murley score (CMS). Standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the postoperative subscapularis muscle-tendon status. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 48 months, the CMS increased from a mean of 54 points preoperatively to a mean of 86 points postoperatively in the ARG (p < 0.01) and from 50 points to 85 points postoperatively in the ORG (p < 0.01). Specific subscapularis tests (belly-press test and lift-off test) were significantly improved from the preoperative to the postoperative status in both repair groups (p < 0.05). Despite a subscapularis tendon healing rate of over 90% on MRI scans in both repair groups, the incomplete correction of specific muscle tests was a frequent postoperative finding. Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears achieved equivalent clinical and structural results compared to the gold standard of open repair. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective: With advances in techniques, arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and structural results of arthroscopic repair versus the gold standard of open repair. It is a prospective cohort study with a control group; evidence level III. Methods: In a prospective study performed at two centers, 18 patients with an isolated subscapularis tear were treated with arthroscopic repair (ARG) and 16 patients with open repair (ORG) using a uniform single-row suture anchor repair technique in both groups. The subscapularis function was assessed using specific clinical tests (belly-press and lift-off tests), strength testing and shoulder function with the use of the Constant–Murley score (CMS). Standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the postoperative subscapularis muscle-tendon status. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 48 months, the CMS increased from a mean of 54 points preoperatively to a mean of 86 points postoperatively in the ARG (p < 0.01) and from 50 points to 85 points postoperatively in the ORG (p < 0.01). Specific subscapularis tests (belly-press test and lift-off test) were significantly improved from the preoperative to the postoperative status in both repair groups (p < 0.05). Despite a subscapularis tendon healing rate of over 90% on MRI scans in both repair groups, the incomplete correction of specific muscle tests was a frequent postoperative finding. Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears achieved equivalent clinical and structural results compared to the gold standard of open repair. Objective: With advances in techniques, arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and structural results of arthroscopic repair versus the gold standard of open repair. It is a prospective cohort study with a control group; evidence level III. Methods: In a prospective study performed at two centers, 18 patients with an isolated subscapularis tear were treated with arthroscopic repair (ARG) and 16 patients with open repair (ORG) using a uniform single-row suture anchor repair technique in both groups. The subscapularis function was assessed using specific clinical tests (belly-press and lift-off tests), strength testing and shoulder function with the use of the Constant-Murley score (CMS). Standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the postoperative subscapularis muscle-tendon status. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 48 months, the CMS increased from a mean of 54 points preoperatively to a mean of 86 points postoperatively in the ARG (p < 0.01) and from 50 points to 85 points postoperatively in the ORG (p < 0.01). Specific subscapularis tests (belly-press test and lift-off test) were significantly improved from the preoperative to the postoperative status in both repair groups (p < 0.05). Despite a subscapularis tendon healing rate of over 90% on MRI scans in both repair groups, the incomplete correction of specific muscle tests was a frequent postoperative finding. Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears achieved equivalent clinical and structural results compared to the gold standard of open repair.Objective: With advances in techniques, arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and structural results of arthroscopic repair versus the gold standard of open repair. It is a prospective cohort study with a control group; evidence level III. Methods: In a prospective study performed at two centers, 18 patients with an isolated subscapularis tear were treated with arthroscopic repair (ARG) and 16 patients with open repair (ORG) using a uniform single-row suture anchor repair technique in both groups. The subscapularis function was assessed using specific clinical tests (belly-press and lift-off tests), strength testing and shoulder function with the use of the Constant-Murley score (CMS). Standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the postoperative subscapularis muscle-tendon status. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 48 months, the CMS increased from a mean of 54 points preoperatively to a mean of 86 points postoperatively in the ARG (p < 0.01) and from 50 points to 85 points postoperatively in the ORG (p < 0.01). Specific subscapularis tests (belly-press test and lift-off test) were significantly improved from the preoperative to the postoperative status in both repair groups (p < 0.05). Despite a subscapularis tendon healing rate of over 90% on MRI scans in both repair groups, the incomplete correction of specific muscle tests was a frequent postoperative finding. Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears achieved equivalent clinical and structural results compared to the gold standard of open repair. Objective: With advances in techniques, arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and structural results of arthroscopic repair versus the gold standard of open repair. It is a prospective cohort study with a control group; evidence level III. Methods: In a prospective study performed at two centers, 18 patients with an isolated subscapularis tear were treated with arthroscopic repair (ARG) and 16 patients with open repair (ORG) using a uniform single-row suture anchor repair technique in both groups. The subscapularis function was assessed using specific clinical tests (belly-press and lift-off tests), strength testing and shoulder function with the use of the Constant–Murley score (CMS). Standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the postoperative subscapularis muscle-tendon status. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 48 months, the CMS increased from a mean of 54 points preoperatively to a mean of 86 points postoperatively in the ARG ( p < 0.01) and from 50 points to 85 points postoperatively in the ORG ( p < 0.01). Specific subscapularis tests (belly-press test and lift-off test) were significantly improved from the preoperative to the postoperative status in both repair groups ( p < 0.05). Despite a subscapularis tendon healing rate of over 90% on MRI scans in both repair groups, the incomplete correction of specific muscle tests was a frequent postoperative finding. Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears achieved equivalent clinical and structural results compared to the gold standard of open repair. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Eichhorn, Stefan Dolde, Janna Gebhard, Florian Bartl, Christoph Hainzer, Lisa Pauly, Stephan |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 Department of Biomechanics, TÜV Süd, Munich Ridlerstr. 65, 80635 Munich, Germany; stefan.eichhorn@tuvsud.com 1 Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany; sekretariat.unfallchirurgie@uniklinik-ulm.de (J.D.); florian.gebhard@uniklinik-ulm.de (F.G.) 4 Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum, Rubensstr. 125, 12157 Berlin, Germany; schulter.avk@vivantes.de (L.H.); stephan.pauly@vivantes.de (S.P.) 2 Center of Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Rosa-Bavaresestr. 1, 80639 Munich, Germany 5 Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical School Berlin, Rüdesheimerstr. 50, 14197 Berlin, Germany |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 5 Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical School Berlin, Rüdesheimerstr. 50, 14197 Berlin, Germany – name: 2 Center of Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Rosa-Bavaresestr. 1, 80639 Munich, Germany – name: 4 Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum, Rubensstr. 125, 12157 Berlin, Germany; schulter.avk@vivantes.de (L.H.); stephan.pauly@vivantes.de (S.P.) – name: 1 Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany; sekretariat.unfallchirurgie@uniklinik-ulm.de (J.D.); florian.gebhard@uniklinik-ulm.de (F.G.) – name: 3 Department of Biomechanics, TÜV Süd, Munich Ridlerstr. 65, 80635 Munich, Germany; stefan.eichhorn@tuvsud.com |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Bartl, Christoph – sequence: 2 fullname: Dolde, Janna – sequence: 3 fullname: Gebhard, Florian – sequence: 4 fullname: Eichhorn, Stefan – sequence: 5 fullname: Hainzer, Lisa – sequence: 6 fullname: Pauly, Stephan |
BookMark | eNptkl1rFTEQhoNUsNZe-QcWvBHk1HxsstkrORxsLRQKWq9DNjs5zSGbrMmm4r832xZtxQTy-cw7vMy8RkchBkDoLcFnjPX448FMhFEiuOxfoGOKu26DmWRHT86v0GnOB1yHlC0l3TGyO--CM9o3OozNtyUVs5RUr18hF7_k5jx6H3-6sG-2ablNMZs4O3NPX88QKjdrl5pom8scvV6gqpQhGz0Xr5PLzQ3olN-gl1b7DKeP-wn6fv75Zvdlc3V9cbnbXm0M5YJsBmCkBzp0smW9sdqOuJeYt-vKessot4JYM1IYMdG4F9zKFoQZGBBtNWUn6NOD7lyGCUYDYalm1JzcpNMvFbVTz3-Cu1X7eKcI4a3oJKkK7x8VUvxRIC9qctmA9zpALFkxQmXXMsG7ir77Bz3EkkL1t1ICtx3j-C-11x6UCzbWxGYVVVtJOGsF7de0Z_-h6hxhcqYW2rr6_izgw0OAqTXJCewfkwSrtR_Uk35gvwGmQKmk |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90097-6 10.1053/jars.2002.30648 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.006 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.08.007 10.1177/23259671221120662 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.013 10.1177/03635465211038233 10.2106/JBJS.D.02051 10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.017 10.2106/JBJS.K.00008 10.1177/0363546510388166 10.1016/j.mric.2019.12.003 10.1177/0363546519838281 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.011 10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.034 10.1177/0363546510396317 10.1007/s00167-023-07403-1 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.014 10.1007/s43465-020-00345-7 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.10.020 10.2106/00004623-200706000-00005 10.1177/0363546517689873 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.06.004 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.035 10.2106/00004623-199607000-00005 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.026 10.1038/s41572-024-00492-3 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.018 10.1177/0363546517721187 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2024 by the authors. 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG – notice: 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2024 by the authors. 2024 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.3390/jcm13216589 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库 ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Databases ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2077-0383 |
ExternalDocumentID | A815346291 10_3390_jcm13216589 |
GeographicLocations | Germany United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ AADQD AAFWJ AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ADBBV AFKRA AFZYC ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR CCPQU CITATION DIK FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR ITC KQ8 MODMG M~E OK1 PGMZT PIMPY RPM UKHRP 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. M48 PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2561-be319e2b78439cfafd098054098039f325f61fcd2ed01a0965f84e6cb3e1afa23 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2077-0383 |
IngestDate | Mon Nov 11 05:42:15 EST 2024 Sat Nov 16 17:16:21 EST 2024 Fri Nov 08 20:56:17 EST 2024 Thu Nov 21 02:03:19 EST 2024 Tue Nov 19 04:04:07 EST 2024 Fri Nov 22 01:54:49 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 21 |
Language | English |
License | Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2561-be319e2b78439cfafd098054098039f325f61fcd2ed01a0965f84e6cb3e1afa23 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0009-0003-6155-8649 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546781/ |
PQID | 3126047350 |
PQPubID | 5046890 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11546781 proquest_miscellaneous_3128743657 proquest_journals_3126047350 gale_infotracmisc_A815346291 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A815346291 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13216589 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2024 text: 2024-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Basel |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Basel |
PublicationTitle | Journal of clinical medicine |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | MDPI AG MDPI |
Publisher_xml | – name: MDPI AG – name: MDPI |
References | Kamijo (ref_26) 2022; 28 Lafosse (ref_5) 2007; 89 Heuberer (ref_10) 2017; 45 Fuchs (ref_19) 1999; 8 Rathi (ref_6) 2017; 63 Samim (ref_20) 2020; 28 Edwards (ref_9) 2005; 87 Sugaya (ref_21) 2005; 21 Burkhart (ref_14) 2002; 18 Saltzman (ref_13) 2017; 33 Gedikbas (ref_24) 2022; 10 Bartl (ref_16) 2011; 39 Mohammed (ref_30) 2021; 55 Hardy (ref_12) 2012; 94 Mall (ref_1) 2012; 28 Monroe (ref_22) 2019; 35 Lanz (ref_27) 2013; 29 Lee (ref_3) 2017; 45 Rhee (ref_23) 2017; 26 Gerber (ref_8) 1996; 78 Bartl (ref_4) 2011; 39 Bedi (ref_2) 2024; 10 Labriola (ref_7) 2005; 14 Rinaldi (ref_15) 2023; 31 Liu (ref_28) 2020; 6 MacDermid (ref_11) 2021; 49 Neviaser (ref_25) 2020; 29 Cvetanovich (ref_31) 2019; 28 Collin (ref_18) 2021; 27 Yoon (ref_29) 2019; 47 Constant (ref_17) 1987; 214 |
References_xml | – volume: 8 start-page: 599 year: 1999 ident: ref_19 article-title: Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: Assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90097-6 contributor: fullname: Fuchs – volume: 18 start-page: 454 year: 2002 ident: ref_14 article-title: Arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair: Technique and preliminary results publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.30648 contributor: fullname: Burkhart – volume: 28 start-page: e1133 year: 2022 ident: ref_26 article-title: Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Subscapularis Tears Show Clinical and Structural Outcome Better for Small Tears Than Larger Tears publication-title: Arthrosc. Sports Med. Rehabil. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.006 contributor: fullname: Kamijo – volume: 63 start-page: 92 year: 2017 ident: ref_6 article-title: The upper and lower segments of subscapularis muscle have different roles in glenohumeral joint functioning publication-title: J. Biomech. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.08.007 contributor: fullname: Rathi – volume: 10 start-page: 23259671221120662 year: 2022 ident: ref_24 article-title: Comparison of Open Versus Arthroscopic Repair for Subscapularis Tendon Tears With or Without Concomitant Supraspinatus Tendon Tears publication-title: Orthop. J. Sports Med. doi: 10.1177/23259671221120662 contributor: fullname: Gedikbas – volume: 28 start-page: 939 year: 2019 ident: ref_31 article-title: Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair publication-title: J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.013 contributor: fullname: Cvetanovich – volume: 49 start-page: 3184 year: 2021 ident: ref_11 article-title: Arthroscopic Versus Mini-open Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Trial and Meta-analysis publication-title: Am. J. Sports Med. doi: 10.1177/03635465211038233 contributor: fullname: MacDermid – volume: 87 start-page: 725 year: 2005 ident: ref_9 article-title: Repair of tears of the subscapularis publication-title: J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02051 contributor: fullname: Edwards – volume: 26 start-page: 2143 year: 2017 ident: ref_23 article-title: The outcomes and affecting factors after arthroscopic isolated subscapularis tendon repair publication-title: J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.017 contributor: fullname: Rhee – volume: 94 start-page: e125 year: 2012 ident: ref_12 article-title: Clinical and structural results of arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tear publication-title: J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00008 contributor: fullname: Hardy – volume: 39 start-page: 490 year: 2011 ident: ref_4 article-title: Open repair of isolated traumatic subscapularis tendon tears publication-title: Am. J. Sports Med. doi: 10.1177/0363546510388166 contributor: fullname: Bartl – volume: 28 start-page: 181 year: 2020 ident: ref_20 article-title: The Postoperative Rotator Cuff publication-title: Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2019.12.003 contributor: fullname: Samim – volume: 47 start-page: 1427 year: 2019 ident: ref_29 article-title: Arthroscopic Repair of the Isolated Subscapularis Full-Thickness Tear: Single- Versus Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique publication-title: Am. J. Sports Med. doi: 10.1177/0363546519838281 contributor: fullname: Yoon – volume: 21 start-page: 1307 year: 2005 ident: ref_21 article-title: Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: Single-row versus dual-row fixation publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.011 contributor: fullname: Sugaya – volume: 214 start-page: 160 year: 1987 ident: ref_17 article-title: A method of functional assessment of the shoulder publication-title: Clin. Orthop. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023 contributor: fullname: Constant – volume: 35 start-page: 1779 year: 2019 ident: ref_22 article-title: Patient-reported outcomes after isolated and combined arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repairs publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.034 contributor: fullname: Monroe – volume: 39 start-page: 1255 year: 2011 ident: ref_16 article-title: Subscapularis function and structural integrity after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears publication-title: Am. J. Sports Med. doi: 10.1177/0363546510396317 contributor: fullname: Bartl – volume: 31 start-page: 2688 year: 2023 ident: ref_15 article-title: Arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: A systematic review publication-title: Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07403-1 contributor: fullname: Rinaldi – volume: 14 start-page: 32S year: 2005 ident: ref_7 article-title: Stability and instability of the glenohumeral joint: The role of shoulder muscles publication-title: J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.014 contributor: fullname: Labriola – volume: 55 start-page: 433 year: 2021 ident: ref_30 article-title: The Relevance of Open Rotator Cuff Repair in 2021 publication-title: Indian J. Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00345-7 contributor: fullname: Mohammed – volume: 33 start-page: 849 year: 2017 ident: ref_13 article-title: Arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears: A systematic review of technique-specific outcomes publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.10.020 contributor: fullname: Saltzman – volume: 89 start-page: 1184 year: 2007 ident: ref_5 article-title: Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears publication-title: J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200706000-00005 contributor: fullname: Lafosse – volume: 45 start-page: 1283 year: 2017 ident: ref_10 article-title: Longitudinal Long-term Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Follow-up After Single-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Clinical Superiority of Structural Tendon Integrity publication-title: Am. J. Sports Med. doi: 10.1177/0363546517689873 contributor: fullname: Heuberer – volume: 29 start-page: 1471 year: 2013 ident: ref_27 article-title: Arthroscopic repair of large subscapularis tendon tears: 2- to 4-year clinical and radiographic outcomes publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.06.004 contributor: fullname: Lanz – volume: 27 start-page: 23259671211042011 year: 2021 ident: ref_18 article-title: Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Subscapularis Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis publication-title: Orthop. J. Sports Med. contributor: fullname: Collin – volume: 29 start-page: 893 year: 2020 ident: ref_25 article-title: Retrospective review of open and arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement: A single surgeon’s experience publication-title: J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.035 contributor: fullname: Neviaser – volume: 78 start-page: 1015 year: 1996 ident: ref_8 article-title: Isolated rupture of the subscapularis tendon publication-title: J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199607000-00005 contributor: fullname: Gerber – volume: 6 start-page: 913 year: 2020 ident: ref_28 article-title: Ten-year clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after repair of isolated subscapularis tears publication-title: JSES Int. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.026 contributor: fullname: Liu – volume: 10 start-page: 8 year: 2024 ident: ref_2 article-title: Rotator cuff tears publication-title: Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00492-3 contributor: fullname: Bedi – volume: 28 start-page: 1306 year: 2012 ident: ref_1 article-title: Outcomes of arthroscopic and open surgical repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.018 contributor: fullname: Mall – volume: 45 start-page: 2555 year: 2017 ident: ref_3 article-title: Comparison of Clinical and Structural Outcomes by Subscapularis Tendon Status in Massive Rotator Cuff Tear publication-title: Am. J. Sports Med. doi: 10.1177/0363546517721187 contributor: fullname: Lee |
SSID | ssj0000884217 |
Score | 2.330605 |
Snippet | Objective: With advances in techniques, arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of... Objective: With advances in techniques, arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 6589 |
SubjectTerms | Arthroscopy Care and treatment Endoscopic surgery Joints Magnetic resonance imaging Methods Patient outcomes Patients Rotator cuff Rotator cuff repair Shoulder injuries Statistical analysis Surgeons Sutures Tendon injuries Tendons |
Title | Clinical and Structural Results Following Arthroscopic and Open Repair of Isolated Subscapularis Tears |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3126047350 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3128743657 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11546781 |
Volume | 13 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8NAEB6sB_EiPjFaZQXBU2x3k243R1GLIor4AG9hsw-stEkxFv--M2kijUcvuewjYXYe35CZbwFONUJ6n1gbDpSSIVqiDbVLRBhJbo2XQjlJjcI3z8OHN3V1TTQ5sumFqYr2TTY-zyfT83z8XtVWzqam19SJ9R7vL4lCBp0s73Wgg-BwKUev_K9SMQLtRTNehDl978NMMeniGGyTVvj564T_FkYuRZrRJmzUEJFdLD5lC1Zcvg1r9_VP8B3wNZfnhOncsueKAJbIM9iTK-eTr5KN8GyLb4xJtMc70VUWs7GpZlP9CM6b6fEnKzy7Rc1DsIm7kP_QdJcXGj17QfUvd-F1dP1yeRPW1yWEBnELDzOH5uRENlQIMozX3vYTRYgMn1HiIzHwkntjhbN9ron1xavYSZNFjmuvRbQHq3mRu31gMh5YzjPMjp2PM6UTI_pGS89jH2F-kwVw2kgxnS1YMVLMJkjY6ZKwAzgjCadkKyhPo-uSf3wJsU6lFwr9bSxFwgPotmaijpv2cHNGaW1jZRpxzMXo5uR-ACe_w7SS6sZyV8yrOQoxkhwMA1Cts_39buLXbo-g2lU8242aHfx_6SGsC0RBi-bFLqyiSrgj6JR2foz4_fbuuFLdH-sS9us |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,729,782,786,887,27933,27934,53800,53802 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9tAEB7xkCiXlkIRbilsJSROJt61s1kfESUKgqCqBImbtd6HCErsqG7Uv98Zx0YxRy6-zO565XnsN_LMtwBnGiG9T60N-0rJED3RhtqlIowlt8ZLoZykRuHRw-D-Sf28Jpoc2fbC1EX7Jp9eFLP5RTF9rmsrF3PTa-vEer_GV0Qhg0GW9zZhGx02itay9DoCK5Ug1F6148WY1fdezBzTLo7Hbdo5gN6G4belkWtnzfDTe3e5Bx8bdMkuV_LPsOGKfdgZN__PD8A3NKAzpgvLHmruWOLdYL9dtZz9rdgQzaL8h8cZrfFMTJflYmrq0VR6guMWevqHlZ7doNEiTsVVKPRougYM4wWboOdUX-BxeD25GoXNTQuhQcjDw9yhJzqRDxTiE-O1t1GqCMzhM059LPpecm-scDbimghjvEqcNHnsuPZaxIewVZSFOwImk77lPMfE2vkkVzo1IjJaep74GFOjPICz9vNnixWhRoaJCGkpW9NSAOekmozcDBVhdNMtgC8hwqrsUmGoTqRIeQDHnZHoHqYrbpWbNe5ZZTHHNI4uXY4C-PEqpplUcla4clmPUQivZH8QgOoYxeu-iZq7K0FbqCm6W91_ff_UU_gwmozvsrub-9tvsCsQTK16II9hC83DfYfNyi5Pasv_D5zeC7s |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS9xAEB-qgvSlrbXFtNquIPgUk93k9ja-iXooVZFqoW9hsx94cpeEpof_vjO5RC4-ti952dlNYL5-Q2Z-C3CgEdL7zNpwpJQM0RNtqF0mwkRya7wUykkaFL64G9_8VmfnRJNz3M_CtE37ppgelbP5UTl9aHsr67mJ-j6x6Pb6lChkMMjyqLY-WoMNdNpYrFTqbRRWKkW4vRzJS7Cyjx7NHEsvjik3GySh16H4dXvkSr6ZvP-fL_0A7zqUyU6WMlvwxpUfYfO6-4--Db6jA50xXVp213LIEv8G--maxexvwyZoHtUTpjU644EYL6t6alppakFBuVpP_7DKs0s0XsSreAqFIE3XgWHcYPfoQc0n-DU5vz-9CLsbF0KD0IeHhUOPdKIYK8Qpxmtv40wRqMNnkvlEjLzk3ljhbMw1Ecd4lTppisRx7bVIPsN6WZVuB5hMR5bzAgts59NC6cyI2GjpeeoTLJGKAA56FeT1klgjx4KENJWvaCqAQ1JPTu6GyjC6mxrAlxBxVX6iMGSnUmQ8gN2BJLqJGS73Cs47N23yhGM5R5cvxwHsvyzTTmo9K121aGUUwiw5GgegBobx8t1E0T1cQXtoqbp7_X_5963fYfP2bJJfXd78-ApvBWKq5SjkLqyjdbg9WGvs4ltr_M_7EA47 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+and+Structural+Results+Following+Arthroscopic+and+Open+Repair+of+Isolated+Subscapularis+Tears&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+clinical+medicine&rft.au=Bartl%2C+Christoph&rft.au=Dolde%2C+Janna&rft.au=Gebhard%2C+Florian&rft.au=Eichhorn%2C+Stefan&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fjcm13216589&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2077-0383&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2077-0383&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2077-0383&client=summon |