Short Implants Versus Standard Implants: Midterm Outcomes of a Clinical Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm survival rate, marginal bone resorption (MBR), and stability of short implants and to compare the results with standard length implants. A total of 38 patients were included. In total, 147 implants (Nucleoss Implants, Izmir, Turkey) were placed (86 s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Implant dentistry Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 95 - 100
Main Authors: Benlidayi, M Emre, Ucar, Yurdanur, Tatli, Ufuk, Ekren, Orhun, Evlice, Burcu, Kisa, Halil Ibrahim, Baksi, Uygar
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01-02-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm survival rate, marginal bone resorption (MBR), and stability of short implants and to compare the results with standard length implants. A total of 38 patients were included. In total, 147 implants (Nucleoss Implants, Izmir, Turkey) were placed (86 short implants and 61 standard implants). Cement-retained metal-ceramic prostheses were fabricated. MBR was evaluated on periapical radiographs taken at implant placement, at the time of crown insertion and annually thereafter. The stability of the implants was evaluated by resonance frequency analysis. The 3- and 5-year cumulative survival rates for standard implants was 98.4% and for short implants was 96.5% (P = 0.644). The MBR of the short implants was significantly lower than that of the standard implants after 1, 2, and 3 years of loading (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between 2 groups after 6 and 12 months of loading in terms of implant stability (implant stability quotient values) (P > 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it is concluded that short implants achieved similar results as standard implants after 3 to 5 years of loading.
AbstractList INTRODUCTIONThe aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm survival rate, marginal bone resorption (MBR), and stability of short implants and to compare the results with standard length implants.MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 38 patients were included. In total, 147 implants (Nucleoss Implants, Izmir, Turkey) were placed (86 short implants and 61 standard implants). Cement-retained metal-ceramic prostheses were fabricated. MBR was evaluated on periapical radiographs taken at implant placement, at the time of crown insertion and annually thereafter. The stability of the implants was evaluated by resonance frequency analysis.RESULTSThe 3- and 5-year cumulative survival rates for standard implants was 98.4% and for short implants was 96.5% (P = 0.644). The MBR of the short implants was significantly lower than that of the standard implants after 1, 2, and 3 years of loading (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between 2 groups after 6 and 12 months of loading in terms of implant stability (implant stability quotient values) (P > 0.05).CONCLUSIONWithin the limits of this study, it is concluded that short implants achieved similar results as standard implants after 3 to 5 years of loading.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm survival rate, marginal bone resorption (MBR), and stability of short implants and to compare the results with standard length implants. A total of 38 patients were included. In total, 147 implants (Nucleoss Implants, Izmir, Turkey) were placed (86 short implants and 61 standard implants). Cement-retained metal-ceramic prostheses were fabricated. MBR was evaluated on periapical radiographs taken at implant placement, at the time of crown insertion and annually thereafter. The stability of the implants was evaluated by resonance frequency analysis. The 3- and 5-year cumulative survival rates for standard implants was 98.4% and for short implants was 96.5% (P = 0.644). The MBR of the short implants was significantly lower than that of the standard implants after 1, 2, and 3 years of loading (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between 2 groups after 6 and 12 months of loading in terms of implant stability (implant stability quotient values) (P > 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it is concluded that short implants achieved similar results as standard implants after 3 to 5 years of loading.
Author Benlidayi, M Emre
Tatli, Ufuk
Ucar, Yurdanur
Kisa, Halil Ibrahim
Ekren, Orhun
Evlice, Burcu
Baksi, Uygar
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: M Emre
  surname: Benlidayi
  fullname: Benlidayi, M Emre
  organization: Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yurdanur
  surname: Ucar
  fullname: Ucar, Yurdanur
  organization: Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ufuk
  surname: Tatli
  fullname: Tatli, Ufuk
  organization: Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Orhun
  surname: Ekren
  fullname: Ekren, Orhun
  organization: Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Burcu
  surname: Evlice
  fullname: Evlice, Burcu
  organization: Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Halil Ibrahim
  surname: Kisa
  fullname: Kisa, Halil Ibrahim
  organization: Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Uygar
  surname: Baksi
  fullname: Baksi, Uygar
  organization: Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29303816$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdUMtOwzAQtFARfcAXICEfuaTYce3E3FDLo1KrHgpco429FkF5FDs59O8JaqkQu4ddaWdmRzMmg7qpkZBrzqac6eRuuZiyv5VwdkZGXIo0inUaD_qdSRUprsSQjEP4ZCzuO70gw1gLJlKuRmS9_Wh8S5fVroS6DfQdfegC3bZQW_D2dLin68K26Cu66VrTVBho4yjQeVnUhYGyZ3R2f0nOHZQBr45zQt6eHl_nL9Fq87ycP6wiE0vZRjZBpxgo5sDFSltlHJfGKYnoJKC2LJ8lAiXw3ry0OY-1tjmA4QDJTM3EhNwedHe--eowtFlVBINlbxWbLmRcp1qKREjVQ8UBanwTgkeX7XxRgd9nnGU_OWbLRfY_x551c3zQ5RXaE-c3OPENtXtvgw
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02452.x
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01767.x
10.1902/jop.2006.050402
10.1111/cid.12252
10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.05.008
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.021
10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.14.x
10.1177/0022034511425675
10.1111/jopr.12171
10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70208-8
10.1111/clr.12409
10.1111/clr.12394
10.1097/ID.0000000000000026
10.1111/clr.12587
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01349.x
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
10.11607/jomi.3185
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00999.x
10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005
10.1177/154405910408300704
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070109.x
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01762.x
10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[257:TCOITI]2.0.CO;2
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01942.x
10.1111/prd.12053
10.1111/clr.12001
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1097/ID.0000000000000710
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 1538-2982
EndPage 100
ExternalDocumentID 10_1097_ID_0000000000000710
29303816
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
.Z2
0R~
53G
5GY
5VS
71W
AAAAV
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAQQT
AARTV
AASCR
AAYEP
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACILI
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
AE3
AEETU
AENEX
AFDTB
AFFNX
AFUWQ
AHQNM
AHRYX
AHVBC
AINUH
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AWKKM
BQLVK
BS7
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
DU5
DUNZO
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
EX3
F2K
F2L
F5P
FCALG
FL-
GK1
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IN~
IPNFZ
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
NPM
N~M
O9-
OCUKA
ODA
OJAPA
OK1
OL1
OLG
OLV
OLW
OLZ
OPUJH
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OXXIT
P-K
P2P
R58
RIG
S4R
S4S
TEORI
TSPGW
V2I
VVN
W3M
WOW
X3V
X3W
YFH
ZFV
ZZMQN
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-d7ef60a60faf269d6cf15cf65eef5ae9d0b473e5a16165db1299dbaac1aa74643
ISSN 1056-6163
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 05:30:45 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 04:57:48 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 16 00:59:54 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c255t-d7ef60a60faf269d6cf15cf65eef5ae9d0b473e5a16165db1299dbaac1aa74643
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 29303816
PQID 1989537356
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1989537356
crossref_primary_10_1097_ID_0000000000000710
pubmed_primary_29303816
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-Feb
2018-02-00
20180201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-Feb
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Implant dentistry
PublicationTitleAlternate Implant Dent
PublicationYear 2018
References Sennerby (R27-18-20210228) 2015; 17
Blanes (R33-18-20210228) 2009; 20
Sotto-Maior (R30-18-20210228) 2015; 24
Cochran (R20-18-20210228) 2002; 12
Lazzara (R9-18-20210228) 1996; 7
Ramos Verri (R31-18-20210228) 2015; 48
Lai (R1-18-20210228) 2013; 24
Quirynen (R8-18-20210228) 1992; 3
Quaranta (R32-18-20210228) 2014; 23
Renouard (R13-18-20210228) 2006; 17
Nisand (R22-18-20210228) 2014; 66
Danesh-Sani (R6-18-20210228) 2016; 54
Benlidayi (R26-18-20210228) 2009; 24
Misch (R18-18-20210228) 2006; 77
das Neves (R2-18-20210228) 2006; 21
Sul (R21-18-20210228) 2009; 20
Brandtner (R4-18-20210228) 2014; 29
Buser (R19-18-20210228) 2004; 83
Han (R7-18-20210228) 2016; 27
Felice (R25-18-20210228) 2014; 7
Annibali (R17-18-20210228) 2012; 91
Chiapasco (R5-18-20210228) 2004; 15
Esposito (R24-18-20210228) 2014; 7
Rossi (R28-18-20210228) 2010; 21
Morand (R14-18-20210228) 2007; 33
Queiroz (R29-18-20210228) 2015; 26
Hammerle (R3-18-20210228) 2002; 29
Gulje (R11-18-20210228) 2013; 24
Slotte (R16-18-20210228) 2015; 17
Rossi (R15-18-20210228) 2015; 26
Goodacre (R10-18-20210228) 1999; 81
Lemos (R12-18-20210228) 2016; 47
Renouard (R23-18-20210228) 2005; 1
References_xml – volume: 24
  start-page: 704
  year: 2009
  ident: R26-18-20210228
  article-title: Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: An experimental study
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
  contributor:
    fullname: Benlidayi
– volume: 21
  start-page: 86
  year: 2006
  ident: R2-18-20210228
  article-title: Short implants- an analysis of longitudinal studies
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
  contributor:
    fullname: das Neves
– volume: 24
  start-page: 230
  year: 2013
  ident: R1-18-20210228
  article-title: Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: A clinical retrospective study of 5–10 years
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02452.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Lai
– volume: 7
  start-page: 383
  year: 2014
  ident: R24-18-20210228
  article-title: Three-year results from a randomized controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws
  publication-title: Eur J Oral Implantol
  contributor:
    fullname: Esposito
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1146
  year: 2009
  ident: R21-18-20210228
  article-title: Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnites, Osseotites, SLA and TiOblast implants
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01767.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Sul
– volume: 77
  start-page: 1340
  year: 2006
  ident: R18-18-20210228
  article-title: Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: A multicenter retrospective 6- year case series study
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050402
  contributor:
    fullname: Misch
– volume: 17
  start-page: 385
  year: 2015
  ident: R16-18-20210228
  article-title: Four-millimeter-long posterior-mandible implants: 5-year outcomes of a prospective multicenter study
  publication-title: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
  doi: 10.1111/cid.12252
  contributor:
    fullname: Slotte
– volume: 54
  start-page: 724
  year: 2016
  ident: R6-18-20210228
  article-title: A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: Anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications
  publication-title: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.05.008
  contributor:
    fullname: Danesh-Sani
– volume: 48
  start-page: 138
  year: 2015
  ident: R31-18-20210228
  article-title: Biomechanical influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution over internal hexagon short implant: 3-D finite element analysis with statistical test
  publication-title: J Biomec
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.021
  contributor:
    fullname: Ramos Verri
– volume: 7
  start-page: 359
  year: 2014
  ident: R25-18-20210228
  article-title: Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: A randomized controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up
  publication-title: Eur J Oral Implantol
  contributor:
    fullname: Felice
– volume: 29
  start-page: 226
  year: 2002
  ident: R3-18-20210228
  article-title: A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.14.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Hammerle
– volume: 91
  start-page: 25
  year: 2012
  ident: R17-18-20210228
  article-title: Short dental implants: A systematic review
  publication-title: J Dent Res
  doi: 10.1177/0022034511425675
  contributor:
    fullname: Annibali
– volume: 24
  start-page: 52
  year: 2015
  ident: R30-18-20210228
  article-title: Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: A photoelastic stress analysis
  publication-title: J Prosthodont
  doi: 10.1111/jopr.12171
  contributor:
    fullname: Sotto-Maior
– volume: 17
  start-page: 844
  year: 2015
  ident: R27-18-20210228
  article-title: Evaluation of a novel cone beam computed tomography scanner for bone density examinations in preoperative 3D reconstructions and correlation with primary implant stability
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  contributor:
    fullname: Sennerby
– volume: 81
  start-page: 537
  year: 1999
  ident: R10-18-20210228
  article-title: Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70208-8
  contributor:
    fullname: Goodacre
– volume: 26
  start-page: 471
  year: 2015
  ident: R15-18-20210228
  article-title: Early loading of 6-mm-short implants with a moderately rough surface supporting single crowns—a prospective 5-year cohort study
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1111/clr.12409
  contributor:
    fullname: Rossi
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1036
  year: 2015
  ident: R29-18-20210228
  article-title: Clinical study on survival rate of short implants placed in the posterior mandibular region: Resonance frequency analysis
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1111/clr.12394
  contributor:
    fullname: Queiroz
– volume: 23
  start-page: 180
  year: 2014
  ident: R32-18-20210228
  article-title: Technical and biological complications related to crown to implant ratio: A systematic review
  publication-title: Implant Dent
  doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000026
  contributor:
    fullname: Quaranta
– volume: 27
  start-page: 452
  year: 2016
  ident: R7-18-20210228
  article-title: A prospective, multicenter study assessing the DENTSPLY Implants, OsseoSpeedTM TX, length 6 mm in the posterior maxilla and mandible. A 1-year follow-up study
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1111/clr.12587
  contributor:
    fullname: Han
– volume: 17
  start-page: 35
  year: 2006
  ident: R13-18-20210228
  article-title: Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01349.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Renouard
– volume: 3
  start-page: 104
  year: 1992
  ident: R8-18-20210228
  article-title: Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss around fixture success in the Brånemark system
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Quirynen
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1164
  year: 2014
  ident: R4-18-20210228
  article-title: A new technique for sandwich osteoplasty with interpositional bone grafts for fixation
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
  doi: 10.11607/jomi.3185
  contributor:
    fullname: Brandtner
– volume: 15
  start-page: 82
  year: 2004
  ident: R5-18-20210228
  article-title: Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: A 1–3-year prospective study on humans
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00999.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Chiapasco
– volume: 47
  start-page: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: R12-18-20210228
  article-title: Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Dent
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005
  contributor:
    fullname: Lemos
– volume: 83
  start-page: 529
  year: 2004
  ident: R19-18-20210228
  article-title: Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface
  publication-title: J Dent Res
  doi: 10.1177/154405910408300704
  contributor:
    fullname: Buser
– volume: 7
  start-page: 73
  year: 1996
  ident: R9-18-20210228
  article-title: Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a five-year period
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070109.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Lazzara
– volume: 20
  start-page: 67
  year: 2009
  ident: R33-18-20210228
  article-title: To what extent does the crown–implant ratio affect survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review
  publication-title: Clin Oral Impl Res
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01762.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Blanes
– volume: 33
  start-page: 257
  year: 2007
  ident: R14-18-20210228
  article-title: The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: Providing a rationale for the use of short implants
  publication-title: J Oral Implantol
  doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[257:TCOITI]2.0.CO;2
  contributor:
    fullname: Morand
– volume: 1
  start-page: 104
  year: 2005
  ident: R23-18-20210228
  article-title: Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: A 2-year retrospective clinical study
  publication-title: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
  doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Renouard
– volume: 12
  start-page: 144
  year: 2002
  ident: R20-18-20210228
  article-title: The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Cochran
– volume: 21
  start-page: 937
  year: 2010
  ident: R28-18-20210228
  article-title: Early loading of single crowns supported by 6-mm-long implants with a moderately rough surface: A prospective 2-year follow-up cohort study
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01942.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Rossi
– volume: 66
  start-page: 72
  year: 2014
  ident: R22-18-20210228
  article-title: Short implant in limited bone volume
  publication-title: Periodontol 2000
  doi: 10.1111/prd.12053
  contributor:
    fullname: Nisand
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1325
  year: 2013
  ident: R11-18-20210228
  article-title: Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: A 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
  doi: 10.1111/clr.12001
  contributor:
    fullname: Gulje
SSID ssj0020208
Score 2.2754226
Snippet The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm survival rate, marginal bone resorption (MBR), and stability of short implants and to compare the results...
INTRODUCTIONThe aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm survival rate, marginal bone resorption (MBR), and stability of short implants and to compare the...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 95
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Alveolar Bone Loss - epidemiology
Alveolar Bone Loss - etiology
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Dental Implants - adverse effects
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Restoration Failure
Dentistry
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Radiography, Dental
Treatment Outcome
Title Short Implants Versus Standard Implants: Midterm Outcomes of a Clinical Study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29303816
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1989537356
Volume 27
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pa9swFBZre9guZd3PdGvRYLcsLE4iKd6tS1waSJpDHOhO5tmSaBlzRmId9t_vSbLsZT-gPcwHYyQsjD7x9N7z9z4R8l4L2S-isaUNDp2oNu-BxGAFWMQLpuM8ErZ2-Golrm_G02SUtBXXbdt_RRrbEGtbOfsAtJtBsQGfEXO8I-p4vxfuq1t0qJ3or2O42HyY2Vmf0mcMQofNBCzupDXM3aWp8Eu8-ix0J6FWctUoz9bOa_1u19X27qqWQPzZpkQk_HDMgEU3-dYyateFZ3B_MVsJpWmowClUvjB7rU1TLJR83XoruNzemvLXhEQ0Dhxmu5-0RnQQj_esrFcA2FtN3mT6MzbrzTdysqV_2nWvFzybernJcImaEbunon29zC7X83mWJjfpATkaoAFC-3d0MZnNZ00obo8mDRpUsfj4l4H3_ZR_BB_OCUmfkuM6eqAXHvYT8kiVz8jjacDjOVk4-GlAmXr4aYC_6fhEa_BpAJ9uNAUawKcO_BdkfZmkk6tefWJGr8DQsOpJoTTvA-9r0AMeS17oiBWaM6U0AxXLfj4SQ8UA_XzOZI7OXixzgCICECN0Tl-Sw3JTqteESi60YkUOVqNRAssVE7gV4j494BKD3A75EOYn--6FUbJAaJhNs9-ns0PehTnM0IDZv1JQqo3ZZZa0x4ZiyHiHvPKT2wyIvqj7s316j7ffkCftanxLDqutUWfkYCfNeY3-T2SxbME
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27933,27934
linkProvider Ovid
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short+Implants+Versus+Standard+Implants%3A+Midterm+Outcomes+of+a+Clinical+Study&rft.jtitle=Implant+dentistry&rft.au=Benlidayi%2C+M+Emre&rft.au=Ucar%2C+Yurdanur&rft.au=Tatli%2C+Ufuk&rft.au=Ekren%2C+Orhun&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.eissn=1538-2982&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FID.0000000000000710&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1056-6163&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1056-6163&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1056-6163&client=summon