Salivary biomarkers to evaluate psychological disorders in oral lichen planus: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

ObjectiveTo analyze the use of salivary biomarkers to identify psychological disorders (anxiety, depression, and stress) in individuals with oral lichen planus (OLP).Materials and MethodsThe search was made in Medline/Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library, ProQuest, and by cross‐ref...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral diseases Vol. 29; no. 7; pp. 2734 - 2746
Main Authors: Pires, Alessandra Laís Pinho Valente, Alves, Lísia Daltro Borges, da Silva, Adriana Mendonça, Arsati, Franco, Lima‐Arsati, Ynara Bosco de Oliveira, dos Santos, Jean Nunes, Calumby, Rodrigo Tripody, Freitas, Valéria Souza
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-10-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectiveTo analyze the use of salivary biomarkers to identify psychological disorders (anxiety, depression, and stress) in individuals with oral lichen planus (OLP).Materials and MethodsThe search was made in Medline/Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library, ProQuest, and by cross‐reference. Original case–control, cross‐sectional, and cohort studies, in human subjects (age ≥18 years) with clinical and histopathological diagnosis, with or without the use of psychometric scales, published until June 2021, were included. Random‐effects meta‐analyses, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity were performed. Publication bias was measured using the Egger test and visual inspection of the funnel plot.ResultsA total of 67 articles were found, of which 12 were included in the meta‐analysis. Among the different biomarkers identified, it was only possible to perform a meta‐analysis for cortisol. The mean difference between salivary cortisol levels in patients with OLP compared to controls was 3.43 ng/ml (95% CI: 1.20–5.65) with I2 = 98.9%. Studies considered outliers were removed and based on sensitivity analyses, results did not change, therefore, being stable.ConclusionThe studies analyzed demonstrated that cortisol was the most quantified biomarker to identify psychological disorders; however, DHEA, IgA, adiponectin, and α‐amylase were also evaluated.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1354-523X
1601-0825
DOI:10.1111/odi.14385