Predicting ¹³Cα chemical shifts for validation of protein structures

The ¹³Cα chemical shifts for 16,299 residues from 213 conformations of four proteins (experimentally determined by X-ray crystallography and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance methods) were computed by using a combination of approaches that includes, but is not limited to, the use of density functional theo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomolecular NMR Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 221 - 235
Main Authors: Vila, Jorge A, Villegas, Myriam E, Baldoni, Hector A, Scheraga, Harold A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers 01-07-2007
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The ¹³Cα chemical shifts for 16,299 residues from 213 conformations of four proteins (experimentally determined by X-ray crystallography and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance methods) were computed by using a combination of approaches that includes, but is not limited to, the use of density functional theory. Initially, a validation test of this methodology was carried out by a detailed examination of the correlation between computed and observed ¹³Cα chemical shifts of 10,564 (of the 16,299) residues from 139 conformations of the human protein ubiquitin. The results of this validation test on ubiquitin show agreement with conclusions derived from computation of the chemical shifts at the ab initio Hartree-Fock level. Further, application of this methodology to 5,735 residues from 74 conformations of the three remaining proteins that differ in their number of amino acid residues, sequence and three-dimensional structure, together with a new scoring function, namely the conformationally averaged root-mean-square-deviation, enables us to: (a) offer a criterion for an accurate assessment of the quality of NMR-derived protein conformations; (b) examine whether X-ray or NMR-solved structures are better representations of the observed ¹³Cα chemical shifts in solution; (c) provide evidence indicating that the proposed methodology is more accurate than automated predictors for validation of protein structures; (d) shed light as to whether the agreement between computed and observed ¹³Cα chemical shifts is influenced by the identity of an amino acid residue or its location in the sequence; and (e) provide evidence confirming the presence of dynamics for proteins in solution, and hence showing that an ensemble of conformations is a better representation of the structure in solution than any single conformation.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-007-9162-x
ISSN:0925-2738
1573-5001
DOI:10.1007/s10858-007-9162-x