How conspiracy theories can stimulate political engagement
Although a growing body of studies has explored the antecedents of people's adoption of conspiracy beliefs, the behavioral consequences of conspiracy theories - particularly regarding political engagement - have been less explored. Research has looked at conspiracy beliefs, exposure to specific...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of elections, public opinion and parties Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 1 - 21 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Routledge
02-01-2022
|
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Although a growing body of studies has explored the antecedents of people's adoption of conspiracy beliefs, the behavioral consequences of conspiracy theories - particularly regarding political engagement - have been less explored. Research has looked at conspiracy beliefs, exposure to specific conspiracy theories, conspiracy thinking, and the communication of conspiracy theories as predictor variables. To date, the findings are mixed due to conceptual differences and the selection of predictors with different functions and aspects. I offer new evidence. First, I explore whether conspiracy beliefs translate into political engagement. Having analyzed the 2012 American National Election Study, I find a positive association between conspiracy beliefs and political activities. Second, by manipulating exposure to a nascent conspiracy theory that emerged during the 2016 presidential primary elections, I examine whether exposure to conspiracy theories drives intention to engage in politics. Across two original survey experiments, the results indicate that conspiracy theories may lead to positive action, encouraging people to get involved in politics. The findings demonstrate that the spread of conspiracy theories is not uniformly detrimental to society. These findings also help to explain why elites within losing political organizations are more likely to spread conspiracy theories: they are a means for mobilizing disenfranchised citizens. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Although a growing body of studies has explored the antecedents of people's adoption of conspiracy beliefs, the behavioral consequences of conspiracy theories - particularly regarding political engagement - have been less explored. Research has looked at conspiracy beliefs, exposure to specific conspiracy theories, conspiracy thinking, and the communication of conspiracy theories as predictor variables. To date, the findings are mixed due to conceptual differences and the selection of predictors with different functions and aspects. I offer new evidence. First, I explore whether conspiracy beliefs translate into political engagement. Having analyzed the 2012 American National Election Study, I find a positive association between conspiracy beliefs and political activities. Second, by manipulating exposure to a nascent conspiracy theory that emerged during the 2016 presidential primary elections, I examine whether exposure to conspiracy theories drives intention to engage in politics. Across two original survey experiments, the results indicate that conspiracy theories may lead to positive action, encouraging people to get involved in politics. The findings demonstrate that the spread of conspiracy theories is not uniformly detrimental to society. These findings also help to explain why elites within losing political organizations are more likely to spread conspiracy theories: they are a means for mobilizing disenfranchised citizens. |
Author | Kim, Yongkwang |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yongkwang orcidid: 0000-0001-7918-9261 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Yongkwang email: adamk.summa@gmail.com organization: Political Science, University of Houston |
BookMark | eNp9kMFKAzEYhINUsK0-grAvsDV_km6ynpSiVih40XNIs39qZDcpSaT07W1p9ehphoEZhm9CRiEGJOQW6AyooncgxVwy1c4YhXYGzRw4gwsyPua1ZK0c_XnVXpFJzl-UCtoAjMn9Mu4qG0Pe-mTsviqfGJPHXFkTqlz88N2bgtU29r54a_oKw8ZscMBQrsmlM33Gm7NOycfz0_tiWa_eXl4Xj6vaMkFL3SlJuTOghGuM7BwaztYWQaKwnWCAhyOKK9dyCh1D1UDDGgHI5ZpxIVs-JfPTrk0x54ROb5MfTNproPoIQP8C0EcA-gzg0Hs49XxwMQ1mF1Pf6WL2fUwumWB91vz_iR9DEmO7 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2022_101363 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11109_024_09952_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1075779 crossref_primary_10_1111_soc4_12945 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1308990 crossref_primary_10_1080_01296612_2023_2279343 crossref_primary_10_1080_10361146_2022_2122773 crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_12923 crossref_primary_10_1080_20954816_2020_1818930 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1537592723003006 crossref_primary_10_5964_jspp_5649 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001 10.1017/xps.2014.7 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7 10.1111/bjop.12212 10.1017/S1049096509090234 10.1111/bjso.12311 10.1177/2053168017746554 10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.09.002 10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428 10.1093/pan/mpr057 10.1177/1065912917721061 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045 10.1111/ajps.12084 10.1177/1065912915621621 10.1017/S0022381610000939 10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.19 10.2307/3791831 10.1017/S1049096509090271 10.1111/jasp.12453 10.1177/1532673X16687266 10.1111/bjop.12018 10.1111/pops.12332 10.1177/0963721417718261 10.1111/pops.12568 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 10.1111/ajps.12234 10.1177/2053168017743105 10.1111/pops.12394 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 10.1017/XPS.2015.19 10.1177/2053168017717602 10.1002/per.1930 10.1177/2053168015622072 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x 10.1007/s11109-014-9287-z 10.1017/CBO9780511921452.004 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 2019 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 2019 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1080/17457289.2019.1651321 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Government |
EISSN | 1745-7297 |
EndPage | 21 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1080_17457289_2019_1651321 1651321 |
Genre | Articles |
GroupedDBID | .7I .QK 0BK 0R~ 29K 4.4 5GY 5VS AAAVI AAGZJ AAMFJ AAMIU AAPUL AATTQ AAZMC ABBKH ABCCY ABFIM ABJVF ABLIJ ABPEM ABPTK ABPTX ABQHQ ABSSG ABTAI ABXUL ABZLS ACGFS ACLSK ACTIO ACTOA ADAHI ADCVX AECIN AEGYZ AEISY AEKEX AEMXT AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AEZRU AFOLD AFWLO AGDLA AGMYJ AGRBW AIJEM AJWEG AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BLEHA BMOTO BOHLJ CCCUG CQ1 CS3 D-I DGFLZ DKSSO EBS E~B E~C FUNRP G-F GTTXZ H13 HZ~ J.O KDLKA KYCEM LJTGL M4Z NA5 NZ. O9- RIG RNANH ROSJB RSYQP S-F STATR TEP TFH TFL TFW TNTFI TRJHH UT5 UT9 V1K VAE ~01 ~S~ AAYXX ABXYU ADKVQ AHDZW CITATION TBQAZ TDBHL TUROJ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-d8703fa184f6a7dfea32bce17e4cd421e061838f9301d2e86162641e37b234793 |
IEDL.DBID | TFW |
ISSN | 1745-7289 |
IngestDate | Fri Nov 22 00:47:47 EST 2024 Tue Jun 13 19:48:10 EDT 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c240t-d8703fa184f6a7dfea32bce17e4cd421e061838f9301d2e86162641e37b234793 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7918-9261 |
PageCount | 21 |
ParticipantIDs | informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_17457289_2019_1651321 crossref_primary_10_1080_17457289_2019_1651321 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 1/2/2022 2022-01-02 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-01-02 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2022 text: 1/2/2022 day: 02 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Journal of elections, public opinion and parties |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Publisher_xml | – name: Routledge |
References | CIT0030 CIT0010 CIT0032 CIT0031 CIT0012 CIT0034 CIT0011 Rosenstone S. J. (CIT0033) 1993 Imhoff R. (CIT0021) 2015 CIT0014 CIT0036 CIT0013 CIT0035 CIT0016 CIT0038 CIT0015 CIT0037 CIT0018 CIT0017 CIT0039 CIT0019 CIT0041 CIT0040 CIT0043 CIT0020 CIT0042 CIT0001 CIT0023 CIT0022 CIT0044 ANES (American National Election Studies) (CIT0002) 2014 CIT0003 CIT0025 CIT0024 CIT0027 CIT0004 CIT0026 Brader T. (CIT0005) 2006 CIT0007 CIT0029 CIT0006 CIT0009 CIT0008 Marcus G. E. (CIT0028) 2000 |
References_xml | – ident: CIT0039 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001 – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1017/xps.2014.7 – ident: CIT0044 doi: 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7 – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1111/bjop.12212 – ident: CIT0020 doi: 10.1017/S1049096509090234 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1111/bjso.12311 – ident: CIT0035 doi: 10.1177/2053168017746554 – ident: CIT0019 doi: 10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.09.002 – ident: CIT0011 doi: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057 – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.1177/1065912917721061 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 – ident: CIT0043 doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045 – ident: CIT0032 doi: 10.1111/ajps.12084 – ident: CIT0037 doi: 10.1177/1065912915621621 – ident: CIT0040 doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000939 – ident: CIT0001 doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.19 – volume-title: Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work year: 2006 ident: CIT0005 contributor: fullname: Brader T. – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.2307/3791831 – ident: CIT0036 doi: 10.1017/S1049096509090271 – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1111/jasp.12453 – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.1177/1532673X16687266 – volume-title: Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America year: 1993 ident: CIT0033 contributor: fullname: Rosenstone S. J. – ident: CIT0023 doi: 10.1111/bjop.12018 – start-page: 122 volume-title: The Psychology of Conspiracy year: 2015 ident: CIT0021 contributor: fullname: Imhoff R. – ident: CIT0042 doi: 10.1111/pops.12332 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1177/0963721417718261 – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1111/pops.12568 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.1111/ajps.12234 – ident: CIT0038 doi: 10.1177/2053168017743105 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1111/pops.12394 – ident: CIT0031 doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 – ident: CIT0030 doi: 10.1017/XPS.2015.19 – ident: CIT0034 doi: 10.1177/2053168017717602 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1002/per.1930 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1177/2053168015622072 – ident: CIT0041 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.1007/s11109-014-9287-z – volume-title: Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment year: 2000 ident: CIT0028 contributor: fullname: Marcus G. E. – volume-title: User’s Guide and Codebook for the ANES 2012 Time Series Study year: 2014 ident: CIT0002 contributor: fullname: ANES (American National Election Studies) – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511921452.004 |
SSID | ssj0040611 |
Score | 2.3560035 |
Snippet | Although a growing body of studies has explored the antecedents of people's adoption of conspiracy beliefs, the behavioral consequences of conspiracy theories... |
SourceID | crossref informaworld |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1 |
Title | How conspiracy theories can stimulate political engagement |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17457289.2019.1651321 |
Volume | 32 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwELagUxfeiPKSB9aU-u2wVdCqEwtFsEVxfGYirWirin_POQ_RDrDAHNmKvvgen3PfHSE3IDlYpWWigGskKHaQWAk6yTF6sYIFP3BROzx5Mo-v9mEU2-QMWy1MLKuMHDrUjSIqXx2NO3eLtiLuFpNoZZAoxMKstM-0QkYVCRDmNvFcT8cvrS-O0YrVksg4tNWmrYbnp122otNW79KNqDPe_4f3PSB7TcpJh_UZOSQ7UB6R7veQ3WNyN5mtKRLj6q978UkrdSNSaIq4U_QB73HGF9B5XSuHe0H51hTNnJDn8Wh6P0maoQpJgcF7mXg0UBFyJHZB58YHyAV3BTADsvCSM0DIrLAhRcv3-B01Q8ojGQjjeKU6PSWdclbCGaGOF0YIngeuObJscPhYCR-kck4FM-iRfgtmNq97Z2SsaUnaYpJFTLIGkx5JNyHPltWlRagnjGTi17Xnf1h7Qbo8qhrizQq_JJ3lxwquyO7Cr66r4_QFjVDE0w |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,1455,1509,27933,27934,58021,59734,60523 |
linkProvider | Taylor & Francis |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwED5BGejCG1GeGVhT6kcchw0BVRClC0WwRXFyZiKtoBXi33POA9oBFpgjW9EX3-Nz7rsDOEXJUQdK-gFyRQRF93wtUfkpRS-WMZv3jNMOx_fh8ElfXbs2OV9aGFdW6Ti0rRpFlL7aGbe7jG5K4s4oiw5CYgquMivqMhUQpSIGtELJsXD980f9x8Ybu3jFKlGkG9uqo0bF89M2C_FpoXvpXNzpr__HG2_AWp11ehfVMdmEJSy2oP09Z3cbzuPxu0fcuPzxnn14pcCRWLRH0HvkBl7cmC_0JlW5HO2FxXNdN7MDD_3r0WXs13MV_Izi99TPyUaFTYnbWZWGucVUcJMhC1FmueQMCTMttI3I-HP6lIoR65EMRWh4KTzdhVYxLnAPPMOzUAieWq44EW009DgQuZWBMYENex3oNmgmk6p9RsLqrqQNJonDJKkx6UA0j3kyLe8tbDVkJBG_rt3_w9oTWI1Hd4NkcDO8PYA2dyIHd9HCD6E1fZ3hESy_5bPj8mx9AiA1yPc |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwED5BkVAX3ojyzMCaEtuxk7BVtFERqEKiCLYoic9MTStohfj3nPMQ7QALzJat6Ivvzp993x3AJfocQ6l8VyJXRFBCzw19VG5K0YvlzGgvs9rh4WMwegn7A1smp9doYWxapeXQpioUUfpqa9wzbZqMuCs6RMuAiIJNzIq6TEliVESANpRXsapx_Nw4YxuuWKWJtF1bw6gR8fy0zEp4WileuhR24u1_-OAd2KrPnE6v2iS7sIbFHrS_u-zuw_Vw-uEQMy6f3fNPp5Q3Eod2CHiHnMDENvlCZ1Yly9FaWLzWWTMH8BQPxjdDt-6q4OYUveeuJgsVJiVmZ1QaaIOp4FmOLEA_1z5nSJCFIjQRmb6mH6kYcR6foQgyXspOD6FVTAs8AifjeSAETw1XnGg2ZjQshTa-zDJpAq8D3QbMZFYVz0hYXZO0wSSxmCQ1Jh2IliFP5uWthalajCTi17nHf5h7AZsP_Ti5vx3dnUCbW4WDvWXhp9Cavy3wDNbf9eK83Flfw4bHmw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+conspiracy+theories+can+stimulate+political+engagement&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+elections%2C+public+opinion+and+parties&rft.au=Kim%2C+Yongkwang&rft.date=2022-01-02&rft.pub=Routledge&rft.issn=1745-7289&rft.eissn=1745-7297&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F17457289.2019.1651321&rft.externalDocID=1651321 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1745-7289&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1745-7289&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1745-7289&client=summon |