Comparison of the solid-phase red cell adherence assay and tube method for detection and identification of red blood cell antibodies

• Published in: American journal of clinical pathology Vol. 162; no. 3; pp. 217 - 219
• Main Authors: Abdelmonem, Mohamed, Dussaq, Alex, Papakonstantino, Kathy, Yunce, Muharrem, Virk, Mrigender Singh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: US Oxford University Press 03-09-2024
• Subjects: Alloantibodies; Antibodies; Antigens; Blood; Blood Group Antigens - immunology; Blood transfusion; Clinical significance; Coombs Test - methods; Coombs' test; Erythrocytes; Erythrocytes - immunology; Fetuses; Hemolytic disease; Humans; Isoantibodies - blood; Isoantibodies - immunology; Polyethylene glycol; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; SPRCA; ABID; PEG-IAT
• ISSN: 0002-9173; 1943-7722; 1943-7722
• DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqae035

Abstract
Objectives
Identifying antibodies to red blood cell antigens is one of transfusion medicine’s critical responsibilities. The International Society of Blood Transfusion recognizes 354 red blood cell antigens. Accurate identification of clinically significant alloantibodies is imperative for preventing hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. We compared the performance of the tube (polyethylene glycol–indirect antiglobulin test [PEG-IAT]) and solid-phase red cell adherence assay techniques.
Methods
We performed a retrospective study on all antibody screens performed between 2007 and 2021 at Stanford Transfusion Services. Initially, 631,535 antibody screens were performed using a solid-phase technique. Subsequent antibody identifications were performed using a combination of tube testing and solid-phase techniques.
Results
Antibody screening resulted in 28,316 (4.5%) positive samples. Antibody identification performed on both platforms identified 50 discordant samples. The anti-E antibody had the lowest sensitivity (98.99%) in the automated solid-phase technique, while anti-Jkb had the lowest sensitivity (98.78%) with the PEG-IAT method.
Conclusions
To our knowledge, this is the first robust, 15-year study comparing methodologic sensitivity to detect clinically significant alloantibodies. The incidence of discordant results between PEG-IAT and the solid-phase technique was low. Among discordant samples, anti-Jka was commonly detected using the solid-phase method but not with the PEG-IAT. In contrast, anti-E was commonly detected by PEG-IAT but not by the solid-phase method.