Access to jeopardy: The legal hybridity of criminal-civil debt in the United States

• Published in: Punishment & society Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 647 - 671
• Main Authors: Verma, Anjuli, Sykes, Bryan L., Winnen, Kyle
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01-10-2024; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Child support; Children; Enforcement; Experience; Families & family life; Parents & parenting; Prisoners; Racial inequality; Risk; Sanctions; Support networks; child support; family complexity; monetary sanctions; legal hybridity; arrears; legal financial obligations
• ISSN: 1462-4745; 1741-3095
• DOI: 10.1177/14624745241235552

Research on the shadow carceral state identifies new species of criminal-civil and civil-criminal legal hybrids embedded in state law. We bring into conversation disparate literatures on growing family complexity, monetary sanctions, justiciable problems, and child support enforcement to examine how contemporary American families experience a system of double and triple jeopardy—the compounding risks of exposure to both criminal and civil debts at the nexus of a legal hybrid, wherein monetary sanctions (criminal) and child support orders (civil) become co-constitutive (double jeopardy), thereby amplifying the risk that a parent will also experience (civil) child support arrearage (triple jeopardy). Using data from seven sources to construct a unique dataset, we evaluate the spatial and racial risk of double and triple jeopardy, as well as the state-level factors that explain them. Our analysis provides a valid description of, and critically establishes the sociolegal precarity wherein, currently incarcerated parents observe and experience their risks of double and triple jeopardy in the child support system via its orders, collections, and enforcement powers. We find that there are, indeed, racial and spatial disparities in the risk of double and triple jeopardy, and that specific state-level factors increment and decrement those risks.