DO UPDATED ECG INTERPRETATION CRITERIA RESULT IN ACCEPTABLE RATES OF FURTHER CARDIAC TESTING IN NCAA DIVISION 1 ATHLETES UNDERGOING ECG–BASED PREPARTICIPATION SCREENING?

DO UPDATED ECG INTERPRETATION CRITERIA RESULT IN ACCEPTABLE RATES OF FURTHER CARDIAC TESTING IN NCAA DIVISION 1 ATHLETES UNDERGOING ECG–BASED PREPARTICIPATION SCREENING?

Results 2011 IC were met if any one of 11 individual IC were present (10.7% overall positive for IC; 4.2% inverted T waves; 2.8% atrial abnormalities,1.6% significant Q waves; 1.6% QRS axis <-30 or >115; 0.8% QRS duration >120 msec; 0.2% right ventricular hypertrophy; 0.6% ST depression; 0....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 61; no. 10; p. E1618
Main Authors: Lawless, Christine E, Albers, Lonnie, Marx, David, Heiss, Lori, Baker, Mathue, Tessendorf, Todd, Krueger, Steven
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Elsevier Inc 12-03-2013
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Athletes
Cardiology
Cardiovascular
Electrocardiography
Heart attacks
Internal Medicine
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Results 2011 IC were met if any one of 11 individual IC were present (10.7% overall positive for IC; 4.2% inverted T waves; 2.8% atrial abnormalities,1.6% significant Q waves; 1.6% QRS axis <-30 or >115; 0.8% QRS duration >120 msec; 0.2% right ventricular hypertrophy; 0.6% ST depression; 0.4% long QTc; 0.2% PVCs; none with pre-excitation or Brugada pattern.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(13)61618-6