Get Comfortable With Uncertainty A Study of the Conventional Values of Literary Analysis in an Undergraduate Literature Course

• Published in: Written communication Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 175 - 221
• Main Author: Wilder, Laura
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications 01-01-2002; SAGE Publications; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Analysis; College Students; Community Relations; Critical Reading; Discourse Communities; Educational Practices; Essays; Ethnography; Grades (Scholastic); Introductory Courses; Literacy Education; Literary Criticism; Literature Appreciation; Questionnaires; Reading Instruction; Research Methodology; Resistance (Psychology); Rhetoric; Student Attitudes; Teaching Methods; Undergraduate Study; Writing Assignments; Writing Instruction
• DOI: 10.1177/074108830201900106
• EISSN: 1552-8472
• ISSN: 0741-0883

This study describes the extent to which shared assumptions of literary scholars form part of an introductory literature course. Fahnestock and Secor, in The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism, describe five special topoi of literary criticism (appearance/reality, paradigm, ubiquity, contemptus mundi, and paradox) that characterize the warrants of literary criticism appearing in a sample of major literary studies journals. This study triangulates ethnographic data of a class's meetings, analyses of students' essays, and questionnaires to discover whether these topoi are communicated to students in a survey course, whether students recognize and use them, and whether students are rewarded for using them. The special topoi of literary criticism appear in the discourse of instructors and students. Though textual analysis did not reveal a connection between using the special topoi in writing assignments and receiving a higher grade, questionnaires revealed that students adept at recognizing literary values and discourse conventions were more successful.