Practical Knowledge of Injuries Caused by Simulated Herbicide Drift in Young Tomato Plants

• Published in: Agrochemicals Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 150 - 169
• Main Authors: de Paula Medeiros, Bruna Aparecida, da Silva Brochado, Maura Gabriela, de Paiva Ferreira, Guilherme Augusto, da Costa Lima, Alessandro, Mielke, Kamila Cabral, Mendes, Kassio Ferreira
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 16-03-2023
• Subjects: ALS; glyphosate; injury levels; photosystem II inhibitors; PPO; subdoses
• ISSN: 2813-3145; 2813-3145
• DOI: 10.3390/agrochemicals2010011

Tomatoes are often grown in proximity to other crops such as grain, which can increase their susceptibility to herbicide drift and subsequent crop. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of simulated herbicide drift on tomato plants. Treatments were established in a 10 × 3 + 1 factorial scheme using a completely randomized design with four replications. The first factor consisted of ten herbicides, while the second was composed by three subdoses (1/4, 1/16, and 1/32) along with an additional treatment without herbicide application. The herbicides 2,4-D, dicamba, glyphosate, saflufenacil, oxyfluorfen, and isoxaflutole caused injury levels greater than 20% or reductions in plant biomass greater than 30% at the lowest subdose. Increasing the subdose resulted in a corresponding increase in injury level and a reduction in biomass. Tomato exposed to hexazinone, diuron, nicosulfuron, and diquat at a subdose of 1/64 exhibited low injury levels and biomass reductions. However, at other subdoses, these herbicides caused significant plant damage. Among the herbicides tested, the auxinic herbicides, particularly dicamba, presented a higher risk for the tomato crop. The documentation and description of the visual symptoms caused by each herbicide applied to tomatoes will aid producers to identify drift problems in the field.