Cardiac Resynchronization Devices

Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: The Food and Drug Administration’s Regulatory Considerations Megan Moynahan, Owen P. Faris, Brian M. Lewis Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices marketed in the U.S. undergo the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) pre-market approval process, which exami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 46; no. 12; pp. 2325 - 2328
Main Authors: Moynahan, Megan, Faris, Owen P., Lewis, Brian M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc 20-12-2005
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: The Food and Drug Administration’s Regulatory Considerations Megan Moynahan, Owen P. Faris, Brian M. Lewis Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices marketed in the U.S. undergo the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) pre-market approval process, which examines the safety and effectiveness of the devices for their intended use. Over the last several years, the FDA has adapted recommendations for CRT clinical trials that support pre-market approval, based on an evolving understanding of what these devices can achieve. This paper outlines the dynamic nature of the FDA’s approval process for CRT devices and briefly reviews the clinical trial designs for the first generation devices. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices have been studied clinically since 1998, and have been on the U.S. market since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the first product in 2001. Since that time, the FDA has approved many different models from three different manufacturers, representing the first and second generations of these products. All of these products have undergone the FDA pre-market approval process, which examines the safety and effectiveness of the devices for their intended use. Over the last several years, the FDA has adapted recommendations for CRT clinical trials based on an evolving understanding of what these devices can achieve. This paper will outline the dynamic nature of the FDA’s approval process for CRT devices and briefly review the clinical trial designs for the first generation devices.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.068