Features of Online Settlement of Consumer Disputes by e-commerce Platforms in the People’s Republic of China

Objective : to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and drawbacks of ODS technologies applied by the platforms. Methods : empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Digital Technologies and Law Vol. 1; no. 3; pp. 691 - 711
Main Author: Ermakova, E. P.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov 20-08-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Objective : to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and drawbacks of ODS technologies applied by the platforms. Methods : empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Specific scientific methods were used: legal-dogmatic and the method of legal norms interpretation. Results : it was found that the internal ODS model on e-commerce Taobao ODS platforms is a direct, clear and effective means of online resolution of consumer disputes. However, being a non-independent “third party”, the internal ODS mechanism of e-commerce platforms will never be able to substitute other external systems of dispute resolution. ODS relies on the data and Internet processes much stronger than traditional dispute resolution. Among the many safety factors emerging as a result of online processes, ODS creates the risk of data leakage, lack of confidentiality and unsafe consumer protection. ODS also causes concerns due to traditional principles of justice such as objectivity, confidentiality and safety of data in the process of dispute settlement. Not only the People’s Republic of China but any country introducing the ODS technologies into the procedures of dispute resolution should take serious measures to ensure the ODS processes are just, unbiased and guarantee observance of procedural rights.  Scientific novelty : consists in a complex research of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, the practice of implementation thereof has its specific features stemming from the model of self-regulation of thee relations, further stipulated by normative legal acts of the People’s Republic of China and reflected in the activity of private ODS platforms. Practical significance : is due to the current absence of possibility to apply the legal norms and rules, taking into account the specific features of ODS technologies on private platforms, to the relations using such technologies. The main provisions and conclusions of the research can be used to improve the mechanisms of legal regulation of ODS technologies in the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation.
AbstractList Objective : to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and drawbacks of ODS technologies applied by the platforms. Methods : empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Specific scientific methods were used: legal-dogmatic and the method of legal norms interpretation. Results : it was found that the internal ODS model on e-commerce Taobao ODS platforms is a direct, clear and effective means of online resolution of consumer disputes. However, being a non-independent “third party”, the internal ODS mechanism of e-commerce platforms will never be able to substitute other external systems of dispute resolution. ODS relies on the data and Internet processes much stronger than traditional dispute resolution. Among the many safety factors emerging as a result of online processes, ODS creates the risk of data leakage, lack of confidentiality and unsafe consumer protection. ODS also causes concerns due to traditional principles of justice such as objectivity, confidentiality and safety of data in the process of dispute settlement. Not only the People’s Republic of China but any country introducing the ODS technologies into the procedures of dispute resolution should take serious measures to ensure the ODS processes are just, unbiased and guarantee observance of procedural rights.  Scientific novelty : consists in a complex research of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, the practice of implementation thereof has its specific features stemming from the model of self-regulation of thee relations, further stipulated by normative legal acts of the People’s Republic of China and reflected in the activity of private ODS platforms. Practical significance : is due to the current absence of possibility to apply the legal norms and rules, taking into account the specific features of ODS technologies on private platforms, to the relations using such technologies. The main provisions and conclusions of the research can be used to improve the mechanisms of legal regulation of ODS technologies in the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation.
Objective: to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and drawbacks of ODS technologies applied by the platforms.Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Specific scientific methods were used: legal-dogmatic and the method of legal norms interpretation.Results: it was found that the internal ODS model on e-commerce Taobao ODS platforms is a direct, clear and effective means of online resolution of consumer disputes. However, being a non-independent “third party”, the internal ODS mechanism of e-commerce platforms will never be able to substitute other external systems of dispute resolution. ODS relies on the data and Internet processes much stronger than traditional dispute resolution. Among the many safety factors emerging as a result of online processes, ODS creates the risk of data leakage, lack of confidentiality and unsafe consumer protection. ODS also causes concerns due to traditional principles of justice such as objectivity, confidentiality and safety of data in the process of dispute settlement. Not only the People’s Republic of China but any country introducing the ODS technologies into the procedures of dispute resolution should take serious measures to ensure the ODS processes are just, unbiased and guarantee observance of procedural rights. Scientific novelty: consists in a complex research of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, the practice of implementation thereof has its specific features stemming from the model of self-regulation of thee relations, further stipulated by normative legal acts of the People’s Republic of China and reflected in the activity of private ODS platforms.Practical significance: is due to the current absence of possibility to apply the legal norms and rules, taking into account the specific features of ODS technologies on private platforms, to the relations using such technologies. The main provisions and conclusions of the research can be used to improve the mechanisms of legal regulation of ODS technologies in the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation.
Author Ermakova, E. P.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: E. P.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5722-3641
  surname: Ermakova
  fullname: Ermakova, E. P.
  organization: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
BookMark eNpNkMtKAzEUhoNUsF6W7vMCU3PrTLKUarVQULysQyZzolNmkiFJF935Gr6eT-K0irg6Px8_H4f_FE188IDQJSUzRhlhV5smd7Mx8BknR2jKlFAFE5JP_uUTdJHShhDCpOJSyinySzB5GyHh4PCD71oP-Bly7qAHn_dwEXza9hDxTZuGbR6b9Q5DYUM_Qgv4sTPZhdgn3Hqc30cAYejg6-Mz4ScYtnXX2oPnvfXmHB070yW4-L1n6HV5-7K4L9YPd6vF9bqwVFakUJzbsmaipPXcUGBzx5xjouICDLVSKulIRa1jnJm6IVQaYeoSDBNOEaUoP0OrH28TzEYPse1N3OlgWn0AIb5pE3NrO9AwrzjUjShdLURFpGFWNeX4gCKSjv7RVfy4bAwpRXB_Pkr0YXu9317vt9ec8G9V_3o-
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202344901003
Cites_doi 10.17265/1548-6605/2022.03.001
10.1504/IJBIS.2013.056719
10.5553/IJODR/235250022021008002002
10.1177/09646639221088529
10.1111/nejo.12350
10.5553/IJODR/235250022016003001006
10.5553/IJODR/235250022020007002002
10.36745/ijca.367
10.1093/comjnl/bxx103
10.1007/978-981-19-5331-6_57
10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-3-622-633
10.21686/2410-7395-2020-4-95-112
10.3390/jtaer16050067
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.21202/jdtl.2023.30
DatabaseName CrossRef
Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: http://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Law
EISSN 2949-2483
EndPage 711
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_e573ebd46fb44708a2c9d633c908132a
10_21202_jdtl_2023_30
GroupedDBID AAFWJ
AAYXX
AFPKN
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
M~E
RHO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1870-933c6b2461b5a1e25f2ff24734ea1c8898f071cf232abd018a4ab6ea24f909913
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2949-2483
IngestDate Mon Oct 21 19:39:30 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 23:21:14 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1870-933c6b2461b5a1e25f2ff24734ea1c8898f071cf232abd018a4ab6ea24f909913
ORCID 0000-0001-5722-3641
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/e573ebd46fb44708a2c9d633c908132a
PageCount 21
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e573ebd46fb44708a2c9d633c908132a
crossref_primary_10_21202_jdtl_2023_30
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-08-20
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-08-20
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-08-20
  day: 20
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Journal of Digital Technologies and Law
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov
Publisher_xml – name: Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov
References ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref20
ref11
ref22
ref10
ref21
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
References_xml – ident: ref4
  doi: 10.17265/1548-6605/2022.03.001
– ident: ref1
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1504/IJBIS.2013.056719
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.5553/IJODR/235250022021008002002
– ident: ref7
– ident: ref20
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1177/09646639221088529
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1111/nejo.12350
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.5553/IJODR/235250022016003001006
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.5553/IJODR/235250022020007002002
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.36745/ijca.367
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1093/comjnl/bxx103
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-5331-6_57
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-3-622-633
– ident: ref9
– ident: ref8
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.21686/2410-7395-2020-4-95-112
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.3390/jtaer16050067
– ident: ref11
– ident: ref12
– ident: ref15
– ident: ref14
SSID ssj0002893888
Score 2.2810533
Snippet Objective : to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and...
Objective: to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
StartPage 691
SubjectTerms buyer
court
digital technologies
e-commerce
internet store
law
online dispute resolution
online dispute settlement
seller
taobao
Title Features of Online Settlement of Consumer Disputes by e-commerce Platforms in the People’s Republic of China
URI https://doaj.org/article/e573ebd46fb44708a2c9d633c908132a
Volume 1
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA62Jy_iE-uLHMTb2t0k-zpqH3gQKVbB25IntOhW3Bbx5t_w7_lLnElq6c2L1xBC-CbJfJNMviHkHEwupTZJVCjuImE4nINJKqNY5Ln3KVr70gnj_O6p6A9QJmdV6gtzwoI8cACua9OcW2VE5pQQeVxIpkuTca5LcGacBWoU52vB1DQ8n3GI7YKoJpzOMetOzRyfGhi_xIznNSe0ptXvncpwm2wt2SC9CrPYIRu23iWtW_m-R2okZwsIhunM0SAISscWFYfxPg8be8vfk7Q_abAyQ0PVB7URLKEXzFaho2c5R0ra0ElNgefRkc8W__78aui9DfrWfhwsob1PHoeDh95NtCyOEOkE9lhUAgSZQjU4lcrEstQx55jIubAy0UVRFg7Yg3bAmKQycVJIIVVmJROuBFaY8APSrme1PSRUAOcCW6Yyh2AMCERRpoYbJ1XK00zIrEMuftGqXoMGRgWxg4e1QlgrhLXicYdcI5arTihd7RvAoNXSoNVfBj36j0GOySbOCS9_WXxC2vO3hT0lrcYszvxC-QFnzMIc
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,866,2107,27934,27935
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Features+of+Online+Settlement+of+Consumer+Disputes+by+e-commerce+Platforms+in+the+People%E2%80%99s+Republic+of+China&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Digital+Technologies+and+Law&rft.au=Ermakova%2C+E.+P.&rft.date=2023-08-20&rft.issn=2949-2483&rft.eissn=2949-2483&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=711&rft_id=info:doi/10.21202%2Fjdtl.2023.30&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_21202_jdtl_2023_30
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2949-2483&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2949-2483&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2949-2483&client=summon