Features of Online Settlement of Consumer Disputes by e-commerce Platforms in the People’s Republic of China
Objective : to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and drawbacks of ODS technologies applied by the platforms. Methods : empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical met...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Digital Technologies and Law Vol. 1; no. 3; pp. 691 - 711 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov
20-08-2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Objective
: to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and drawbacks of ODS technologies applied by the platforms.
Methods
: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Specific scientific methods were used: legal-dogmatic and the method of legal norms interpretation.
Results
: it was found that the internal ODS model on e-commerce Taobao ODS platforms is a direct, clear and effective means of online resolution of consumer disputes. However, being a non-independent “third party”, the internal ODS mechanism of e-commerce platforms will never be able to substitute other external systems of dispute resolution. ODS relies on the data and Internet processes much stronger than traditional dispute resolution. Among the many safety factors emerging as a result of online processes, ODS creates the risk of data leakage, lack of confidentiality and unsafe consumer protection. ODS also causes concerns due to traditional principles of justice such as objectivity, confidentiality and safety of data in the process of dispute settlement. Not only the People’s Republic of China but any country introducing the ODS technologies into the procedures of dispute resolution should take serious measures to ensure the ODS processes are just, unbiased and guarantee observance of procedural rights.
Scientific novelty
: consists in a complex research of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, the practice of implementation thereof has its specific features stemming from the model of self-regulation of thee relations, further stipulated by normative legal acts of the People’s Republic of China and reflected in the activity of private ODS platforms.
Practical significance
: is due to the current absence of possibility to apply the legal norms and rules, taking into account the specific features of ODS technologies on private platforms, to the relations using such technologies. The main provisions and conclusions of the research can be used to improve the mechanisms of legal regulation of ODS technologies in the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective
: to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and drawbacks of ODS technologies applied by the platforms.
Methods
: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Specific scientific methods were used: legal-dogmatic and the method of legal norms interpretation.
Results
: it was found that the internal ODS model on e-commerce Taobao ODS platforms is a direct, clear and effective means of online resolution of consumer disputes. However, being a non-independent “third party”, the internal ODS mechanism of e-commerce platforms will never be able to substitute other external systems of dispute resolution. ODS relies on the data and Internet processes much stronger than traditional dispute resolution. Among the many safety factors emerging as a result of online processes, ODS creates the risk of data leakage, lack of confidentiality and unsafe consumer protection. ODS also causes concerns due to traditional principles of justice such as objectivity, confidentiality and safety of data in the process of dispute settlement. Not only the People’s Republic of China but any country introducing the ODS technologies into the procedures of dispute resolution should take serious measures to ensure the ODS processes are just, unbiased and guarantee observance of procedural rights.
Scientific novelty
: consists in a complex research of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, the practice of implementation thereof has its specific features stemming from the model of self-regulation of thee relations, further stipulated by normative legal acts of the People’s Republic of China and reflected in the activity of private ODS platforms.
Practical significance
: is due to the current absence of possibility to apply the legal norms and rules, taking into account the specific features of ODS technologies on private platforms, to the relations using such technologies. The main provisions and conclusions of the research can be used to improve the mechanisms of legal regulation of ODS technologies in the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation. Objective: to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and drawbacks of ODS technologies applied by the platforms.Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Specific scientific methods were used: legal-dogmatic and the method of legal norms interpretation.Results: it was found that the internal ODS model on e-commerce Taobao ODS platforms is a direct, clear and effective means of online resolution of consumer disputes. However, being a non-independent “third party”, the internal ODS mechanism of e-commerce platforms will never be able to substitute other external systems of dispute resolution. ODS relies on the data and Internet processes much stronger than traditional dispute resolution. Among the many safety factors emerging as a result of online processes, ODS creates the risk of data leakage, lack of confidentiality and unsafe consumer protection. ODS also causes concerns due to traditional principles of justice such as objectivity, confidentiality and safety of data in the process of dispute settlement. Not only the People’s Republic of China but any country introducing the ODS technologies into the procedures of dispute resolution should take serious measures to ensure the ODS processes are just, unbiased and guarantee observance of procedural rights. Scientific novelty: consists in a complex research of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, the practice of implementation thereof has its specific features stemming from the model of self-regulation of thee relations, further stipulated by normative legal acts of the People’s Republic of China and reflected in the activity of private ODS platforms.Practical significance: is due to the current absence of possibility to apply the legal norms and rules, taking into account the specific features of ODS technologies on private platforms, to the relations using such technologies. The main provisions and conclusions of the research can be used to improve the mechanisms of legal regulation of ODS technologies in the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation. |
Author | Ermakova, E. P. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: E. P. orcidid: 0000-0001-5722-3641 surname: Ermakova fullname: Ermakova, E. P. organization: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba |
BookMark | eNpNkMtKAzEUhoNUsF6W7vMCU3PrTLKUarVQULysQyZzolNmkiFJF935Gr6eT-K0irg6Px8_H4f_FE188IDQJSUzRhlhV5smd7Mx8BknR2jKlFAFE5JP_uUTdJHShhDCpOJSyinySzB5GyHh4PCD71oP-Bly7qAHn_dwEXza9hDxTZuGbR6b9Q5DYUM_Qgv4sTPZhdgn3Hqc30cAYejg6-Mz4ScYtnXX2oPnvfXmHB070yW4-L1n6HV5-7K4L9YPd6vF9bqwVFakUJzbsmaipPXcUGBzx5xjouICDLVSKulIRa1jnJm6IVQaYeoSDBNOEaUoP0OrH28TzEYPse1N3OlgWn0AIb5pE3NrO9AwrzjUjShdLURFpGFWNeX4gCKSjv7RVfy4bAwpRXB_Pkr0YXu9317vt9ec8G9V_3o- |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202344901003 |
Cites_doi | 10.17265/1548-6605/2022.03.001 10.1504/IJBIS.2013.056719 10.5553/IJODR/235250022021008002002 10.1177/09646639221088529 10.1111/nejo.12350 10.5553/IJODR/235250022016003001006 10.5553/IJODR/235250022020007002002 10.36745/ijca.367 10.1093/comjnl/bxx103 10.1007/978-981-19-5331-6_57 10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-3-622-633 10.21686/2410-7395-2020-4-95-112 10.3390/jtaer16050067 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.21202/jdtl.2023.30 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Law |
EISSN | 2949-2483 |
EndPage | 711 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_e573ebd46fb44708a2c9d633c908132a 10_21202_jdtl_2023_30 |
GroupedDBID | AAFWJ AAYXX AFPKN CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ M~E RHO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1870-933c6b2461b5a1e25f2ff24734ea1c8898f071cf232abd018a4ab6ea24f909913 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2949-2483 |
IngestDate | Mon Oct 21 19:39:30 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 23:21:14 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1870-933c6b2461b5a1e25f2ff24734ea1c8898f071cf232abd018a4ab6ea24f909913 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-5722-3641 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/e573ebd46fb44708a2c9d633c908132a |
PageCount | 21 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e573ebd46fb44708a2c9d633c908132a crossref_primary_10_21202_jdtl_2023_30 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-08-20 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-08-20 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2023 text: 2023-08-20 day: 20 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Journal of Digital Technologies and Law |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov |
Publisher_xml | – name: Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov |
References | ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref20 ref11 ref22 ref10 ref21 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 |
References_xml | – ident: ref4 doi: 10.17265/1548-6605/2022.03.001 – ident: ref1 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1504/IJBIS.2013.056719 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.5553/IJODR/235250022021008002002 – ident: ref7 – ident: ref20 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1177/09646639221088529 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1111/nejo.12350 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.5553/IJODR/235250022016003001006 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.5553/IJODR/235250022020007002002 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.36745/ijca.367 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1093/comjnl/bxx103 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-5331-6_57 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-3-622-633 – ident: ref9 – ident: ref8 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.21686/2410-7395-2020-4-95-112 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.3390/jtaer16050067 – ident: ref11 – ident: ref12 – ident: ref15 – ident: ref14 |
SSID | ssj0002893888 |
Score | 2.2810533 |
Snippet | Objective
: to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and... Objective: to research the features of online dispute settlement by e-commerce platforms in the People’s Republic of China, to reveal positive features and... |
SourceID | doaj crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 691 |
SubjectTerms | buyer court digital technologies e-commerce internet store law online dispute resolution online dispute settlement seller taobao |
Title | Features of Online Settlement of Consumer Disputes by e-commerce Platforms in the People’s Republic of China |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/e573ebd46fb44708a2c9d633c908132a |
Volume | 1 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA62Jy_iE-uLHMTb2t0k-zpqH3gQKVbB25IntOhW3Bbx5t_w7_lLnElq6c2L1xBC-CbJfJNMviHkHEwupTZJVCjuImE4nINJKqNY5Ln3KVr70gnj_O6p6A9QJmdV6gtzwoI8cACua9OcW2VE5pQQeVxIpkuTca5LcGacBWoU52vB1DQ8n3GI7YKoJpzOMetOzRyfGhi_xIznNSe0ptXvncpwm2wt2SC9CrPYIRu23iWtW_m-R2okZwsIhunM0SAISscWFYfxPg8be8vfk7Q_abAyQ0PVB7URLKEXzFaho2c5R0ra0ElNgefRkc8W__78aui9DfrWfhwsob1PHoeDh95NtCyOEOkE9lhUAgSZQjU4lcrEstQx55jIubAy0UVRFg7Yg3bAmKQycVJIIVVmJROuBFaY8APSrme1PSRUAOcCW6Yyh2AMCERRpoYbJ1XK00zIrEMuftGqXoMGRgWxg4e1QlgrhLXicYdcI5arTihd7RvAoNXSoNVfBj36j0GOySbOCS9_WXxC2vO3hT0lrcYszvxC-QFnzMIc |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,866,2107,27934,27935 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Features+of+Online+Settlement+of+Consumer+Disputes+by+e-commerce+Platforms+in+the+People%E2%80%99s+Republic+of+China&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Digital+Technologies+and+Law&rft.au=Ermakova%2C+E.+P.&rft.date=2023-08-20&rft.issn=2949-2483&rft.eissn=2949-2483&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=711&rft_id=info:doi/10.21202%2Fjdtl.2023.30&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_21202_jdtl_2023_30 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2949-2483&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2949-2483&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2949-2483&client=summon |