The effect of replacing conventional alfalfa hay with lower-lignin alfalfa hay on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and energy utilization in lactating Jersey cows

Lower-lignin (LoL) varieties of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) have been developed in recent years and have the potential to positively affect animal performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing the proportion of LoL alfalfa hay in diets fed to lactating dairy cow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dairy science Vol. 107; no. 11; pp. 9379 - 9389
Main Authors: Buse, K.K., Carroll, A.L., Bradford, B.J., Min, D., Jagadish, K., Kononoff, P.J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-11-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Lower-lignin (LoL) varieties of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) have been developed in recent years and have the potential to positively affect animal performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing the proportion of LoL alfalfa hay in diets fed to lactating dairy cows. Research plots were planted with a conventional variety of alfalfa (CON; Dairyland Hybriforce 3400) and 2 LoL varieties (genetically engineered lower-lignin alfalfa [LLG], 54HVX42, and breeding-derived lower-lignin alfalfa [LLB], Aflorex HiGest 460). After harvest, the LoL varieties were blended in equal proportions for feeding. A total of 12 multiparous Jersey cows (100 ± 4 DIM) were used in a 3 × 3 Latin square with 3 periods of 28 d. Cows were assigned to 3 diets containing 0% (control diet; CNTRL), 16.1% (low diet; MdLL), and 32.2% (high diet; HiLL) of the diet DM as LoL alfalfa hay, which replaced CON. The CON alfalfa had average CP, NDF, and lignin contents (DM basis) of 20.5 ± 1.15%, 42.1 ± 1.37%, and 6.81 ± 0.57%, respectively, whereas the LoL alfalfa averaged 19.8 ± 0.75%, 39.9 ± 1.56%, and 6.07 ± 0.28%, respectively. No difference was observed in DMI (20.4 ± 0.61 kg/d). No difference in milk yield was observed, averaging 31.0 ± 1.02 kg/d across treatments. Similarly, no difference was observed in ECM yield (averaging 36.2 ± 1.43 kg/d). Feed conversion (ECM/DMI) tended to increase linearly with LoL alfalfa inclusion (1.74 to 1.80 ± 0.03). No difference was observed for milk fat yield and content (1.39 ± 0.075 kg/d and 4.51 ± 0.219%) or milk protein yield and content (1.06 ± 0.041 kg/d and 3.43 ± 0.096%). Total methane production quadratically decreased from CNTRL to MdLL then increased to HiLL (441, 389, 412 ± 18.2 L/d, respectively). No differences were observed on total-tract digestibility of DM (averaging 67.2 ± 0.55%) and NDF (averaging 50.9 ± 1.56%). No difference was observed in the concentration of digestible energy, metabolizable energy, or NEL was observed averaging 2.82 ± 0.021, 2.51 ± 0.027, and 1.72 ± 0.030 Mcal/kg, respectively. Our results suggest that replacing CON alfalfa with LoL alfalfa has no effects on milk production, milk composition, or nutrient digestibility, but may improve feed efficiency. The list of standard abbreviations for JDS is available at adsa.org/jds-abbreviations-24. Nonstandard abbreviations are available in the Notes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-0302
1525-3198
1525-3198
DOI:10.3168/jds.2024-24966