Phonosemantic Interference: Multiple Motivation in the Imitative Word Coinage (on the Material of Invented Languages)
Introduction . Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by several categorically different motives of nomination. Several phonosemantic studies have reported this effect; however, a clear definition of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diskurs (Online) Vol. 6; no. 4; pp. 150 - 164 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University
28-10-2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Introduction
. Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by several categorically different motives of nomination. Several phonosemantic studies have reported this effect; however, a clear definition of the term, the description of the existing models of motive combinations, as well as possible explanations behind this phenomenon have yet to be developed. The objective of this article is to attempt to formulate the definition of this term and to describe the mechanisms of phonosemantic interference using new linguistic material (artificially constructed lexis).
Methodology and sources
. The study is conducted within the framework of the phonosemantic approach developed by Stanislav Voronin on the material of artificially constructed words from well-known fictional languages Lapin, Klingon, Elvish, and Navi. Methods of the research include the method of continuous sampling, typological comparison, and the method of phonosemantic analysis.
Results and discussion
. Using the material of artificially constructed lexis, the examples of the combination of several motives of nomination for a single sound-imitative sign are demonstrated and the motives of their coinage are studied. The typological comparison of the artificially constructed words against imitative words of natural origin has revealed similar models of multiple motivation both in artificial and natural word coinage, which suggests that multiple nomination is a regular way of primary nomination. The definition of the term phonosemantic interference has been provided.
Conclusion
. Multiple motivation reflects the complex nature of the intermodal perception of extralinguistic objects. In the case of phonosemantic interference, the phonetic form of a word is the product of a co-operative action of several senses. The reflection of several denotata in a single sound form increases the variety of primary forms and meanings and helps explicate subtle semantic contrasts. The notion of phonosemantic interference enables analyzing, describing, and understanding the mechanisms of complicated cases of imitative word coinage within the framework of the already well established phonosemantic taxonomy. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Introduction
. Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by several categorically different motives of nomination. Several phonosemantic studies have reported this effect; however, a clear definition of the term, the description of the existing models of motive combinations, as well as possible explanations behind this phenomenon have yet to be developed. The objective of this article is to attempt to formulate the definition of this term and to describe the mechanisms of phonosemantic interference using new linguistic material (artificially constructed lexis).
Methodology and sources
. The study is conducted within the framework of the phonosemantic approach developed by Stanislav Voronin on the material of artificially constructed words from well-known fictional languages Lapin, Klingon, Elvish, and Navi. Methods of the research include the method of continuous sampling, typological comparison, and the method of phonosemantic analysis.
Results and discussion
. Using the material of artificially constructed lexis, the examples of the combination of several motives of nomination for a single sound-imitative sign are demonstrated and the motives of their coinage are studied. The typological comparison of the artificially constructed words against imitative words of natural origin has revealed similar models of multiple motivation both in artificial and natural word coinage, which suggests that multiple nomination is a regular way of primary nomination. The definition of the term phonosemantic interference has been provided.
Conclusion
. Multiple motivation reflects the complex nature of the intermodal perception of extralinguistic objects. In the case of phonosemantic interference, the phonetic form of a word is the product of a co-operative action of several senses. The reflection of several denotata in a single sound form increases the variety of primary forms and meanings and helps explicate subtle semantic contrasts. The notion of phonosemantic interference enables analyzing, describing, and understanding the mechanisms of complicated cases of imitative word coinage within the framework of the already well established phonosemantic taxonomy. Introduction. Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by several categorically different motives of nomination. Several phonosemantic studies have reported this effect; however, a clear definition of the term, the description of the existing models of motive combinations, as well as possible explanations behind this phenomenon have yet to be developed. The objective of this article is to attempt to formulate the definition of this term and to describe the mechanisms of phonosemantic interference using new linguistic material (artificially constructed lexis).Methodology and sources. The study is conducted within the framework of the phonosemantic approach developed by Stanislav Voronin on the material of artificially constructed words from well-known fictional languages Lapin, Klingon, Elvish, and Navi. Methods of the research include the method of continuous sampling, typological comparison, and the method of phonosemantic analysis.Results and discussion. Using the material of artificially constructed lexis, the examples of the combination of several motives of nomination for a single sound-imitative sign are demonstrated and the motives of their coinage are studied. The typological comparison of the artificially constructed words against imitative words of natural origin has revealed similar models of multiple motivation both in artificial and natural word coinage, which suggests that multiple nomination is a regular way of primary nomination. The definition of the term phonosemantic interference has been provided.Conclusion. Multiple motivation reflects the complex nature of the intermodal perception of extralinguistic objects. In the case of phonosemantic interference, the phonetic form of a word is the product of a co-operative action of several senses. The reflection of several denotata in a single sound form increases the variety of primary forms and meanings and helps explicate subtle semantic contrasts. The notion of phonosemantic interference enables analyzing, describing, and understanding the mechanisms of complicated cases of imitative word coinage within the framework of the already well established phonosemantic taxonomy. |
Author | Davydova, V. A. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: V. A. orcidid: 0000-0002-4475-5267 surname: Davydova fullname: Davydova, V. A. organization: Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University |
BookMark | eNo9kU9rGzEQxUVJoUma7yDoJTmo1X-vklMwaWuwaQ8tPYpZadZRWEtBuzb021e2285lhjePH8y8K3KRS0ZCPgj-UUnL1SephWSdsZJJLjmzTDNhOBNWvyGX0pqOLVpdtPmf8R25maYXzrl0QnLDL8n--3PJZcId5DkFusoz1gEr5oD3dLMf5_Q6It2UOR1gTiXTlOn8jHS1S3MTDkh_lRrpsqQMW6S35bzeQOMkGGkZGvOADRvpGvJ231zT3XvydoBxwpu__Zr8_Pz0Y_mVrb99WS0f1yyIhdAsmhhlUCYIbnoFBnVvh54LiYCGQy_64BzERad6DGoIeLR2nbSi44BOqWuyOnNjgRf_WtMO6m9fIPmTUOrWQ213j-ijAycH4dSAqDXa3nWgJedOCRFUlI31cGaFWqap4vCfJ7g_BeKPf_bHP_tjIN567VsgvgWi_gBg5oGe |
Cites_doi | 10.1037/h0070931 10.1017/S0332586516000147 10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88 10.1159/000261678 10.1017/CBO9780511751806.022 10.1075/ill.10.06nob 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.013 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.32603/2412-8562-2020-6-4-150-164 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Philosophy |
EISSN | 2658-7777 |
EndPage | 164 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2 10_32603_2412_8562_2020_6_4_150_164 |
GroupedDBID | AAYXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1714-d5dd2c35c105b3a5e4b6fb012eae50ab1bc99ad783bec3fce35c18826180ae933 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2412-8562 |
IngestDate | Mon Oct 21 19:39:06 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 23:33:33 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | false |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1714-d5dd2c35c105b3a5e4b6fb012eae50ab1bc99ad783bec3fce35c18826180ae933 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-4475-5267 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2 crossref_primary_10_32603_2412_8562_2020_6_4_150_164 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-10-28 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-10-28 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2020 text: 2020-10-28 day: 28 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Diskurs (Online) |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University |
Publisher_xml | – name: Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University |
References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref39 ref16 ref38 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 |
References_xml | – ident: ref37 – ident: ref1 – ident: ref39 – ident: ref3 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1037/h0070931 – ident: ref5 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1017/S0332586516000147 – ident: ref20 – ident: ref29 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88 – ident: ref24 – ident: ref22 – ident: ref25 – ident: ref27 – ident: ref9 – ident: ref19 – ident: ref32 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1159/000261678 – ident: ref17 – ident: ref34 – ident: ref15 – ident: ref30 – ident: ref38 – ident: ref6 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511751806.022 – ident: ref28 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1075/ill.10.06nob – ident: ref21 – ident: ref23 – ident: ref26 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.013 – ident: ref18 – ident: ref16 – ident: ref10 – ident: ref35 – ident: ref12 – ident: ref33 – ident: ref14 – ident: ref31 |
SSID | ssj0002912050 |
Score | 1.7872236 |
Snippet | Introduction
. Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by... Introduction. Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by... |
SourceID | doaj crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 150 |
SubjectTerms | denotatum fictional languages motivation onomatopoeia phonosemantic interference phonosemantics sound symbolism |
Title | Phonosemantic Interference: Multiple Motivation in the Imitative Word Coinage (on the Material of Invented Languages) |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2 |
Volume | 6 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA7qQbyIT3wT0IMegm2SzTbefLILriyo6C3kMcU92IrrCv57J2l30ZMXr-mD8s2XzDfDdIaQo66QulsGxYRSnsmgFLMZD6zE3WW1KpxLBbK9--7dc3F1HdvkzEZ9xZqwpj1wA9xp0FbzEmVGCSAlKKcLK2NKX-S5F6E5fTP1I5iKZzDXOc_SeFb0ULjl0csvksMYoqJ-F6ezRSRJDJ-YZCiMWK7kL_f0o4t_cjc3K2S51Yn0vPm-VTIH1RpZGk4HD3ytk8nwpa7qMbwiNiNPU2qv_XnvjA7aOkE6mM0vo6OKotqj_dfUlvsT6BMGnvSyHsUCGHpcN5cH9iORktYl7aeKdAj0ts1qjk82yOPN9cNlj7VDFJiPs81Z6ITAveh4FFJO2A5Ip0qHbgksdDLrcue1tqFbCLSmKD3EW1F2q7zILGghNslCVVewRSgPjjvELwiMKnOAIisLbtGeaF0Q3m4TOcXOvDW9MgzGGAlyEyE3EXITITfKSIOQG4R8m1xEnGePxIbXaQFpYFoamL9osPMfL9klS4kP6Jp4sUcWPt4nsE_mx2FykOj1DV7xzv4 |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,866,2106,27933,27934 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phonosemantic+Interference%3A+Multiple+Motivation+in+the+Imitative+Word+Coinage+%28on+the+Material+of+Invented+Languages%29&rft.jtitle=Diskurs+%28Online%29&rft.au=V.+A.+Davydova&rft.date=2020-10-28&rft.pub=Saint+Petersburg+Electrotechnical+University&rft.issn=2412-8562&rft.eissn=2658-7777&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=164&rft_id=info:doi/10.32603%2F2412-8562-2020-6-4-150-164&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2412-8562&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2412-8562&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2412-8562&client=summon |