Phonosemantic Interference: Multiple Motivation in the Imitative Word Coinage (on the Material of Invented Languages)

Introduction . Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by several categorically different motives of nomination. Several phonosemantic studies have reported this effect; however, a clear definition of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diskurs (Online) Vol. 6; no. 4; pp. 150 - 164
Main Author: Davydova, V. A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University 28-10-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Introduction . Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by several categorically different motives of nomination. Several phonosemantic studies have reported this effect; however, a clear definition of the term, the description of the existing models of motive combinations, as well as possible explanations behind this phenomenon have yet to be developed. The objective of this article is to attempt to formulate the definition of this term and to describe the mechanisms of phonosemantic interference using new linguistic material (artificially constructed lexis). Methodology and sources . The study is conducted within the framework of the phonosemantic approach developed by Stanislav Voronin on the material of artificially constructed words from well-known fictional languages Lapin, Klingon, Elvish, and Navi. Methods of the research include the method of continuous sampling, typological comparison, and the method of phonosemantic analysis. Results and discussion . Using the material of artificially constructed lexis, the examples of the combination of several motives of nomination for a single sound-imitative sign are demonstrated and the motives of their coinage are studied. The typological comparison of the artificially constructed words against imitative words of natural origin has revealed similar models of multiple motivation both in artificial and natural word coinage, which suggests that multiple nomination is a regular way of primary nomination. The definition of the term phonosemantic interference has been provided. Conclusion . Multiple motivation reflects the complex nature of the intermodal perception of extralinguistic objects. In the case of phonosemantic interference, the phonetic form of a word is the product of a co-operative action of several senses. The reflection of several denotata in a single sound form increases the variety of primary forms and meanings and helps explicate subtle semantic contrasts. The notion of phonosemantic interference enables analyzing, describing, and understanding the mechanisms of complicated cases of imitative word coinage within the framework of the already well established phonosemantic taxonomy.
AbstractList Introduction . Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by several categorically different motives of nomination. Several phonosemantic studies have reported this effect; however, a clear definition of the term, the description of the existing models of motive combinations, as well as possible explanations behind this phenomenon have yet to be developed. The objective of this article is to attempt to formulate the definition of this term and to describe the mechanisms of phonosemantic interference using new linguistic material (artificially constructed lexis). Methodology and sources . The study is conducted within the framework of the phonosemantic approach developed by Stanislav Voronin on the material of artificially constructed words from well-known fictional languages Lapin, Klingon, Elvish, and Navi. Methods of the research include the method of continuous sampling, typological comparison, and the method of phonosemantic analysis. Results and discussion . Using the material of artificially constructed lexis, the examples of the combination of several motives of nomination for a single sound-imitative sign are demonstrated and the motives of their coinage are studied. The typological comparison of the artificially constructed words against imitative words of natural origin has revealed similar models of multiple motivation both in artificial and natural word coinage, which suggests that multiple nomination is a regular way of primary nomination. The definition of the term phonosemantic interference has been provided. Conclusion . Multiple motivation reflects the complex nature of the intermodal perception of extralinguistic objects. In the case of phonosemantic interference, the phonetic form of a word is the product of a co-operative action of several senses. The reflection of several denotata in a single sound form increases the variety of primary forms and meanings and helps explicate subtle semantic contrasts. The notion of phonosemantic interference enables analyzing, describing, and understanding the mechanisms of complicated cases of imitative word coinage within the framework of the already well established phonosemantic taxonomy.
Introduction. Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by several categorically different motives of nomination. Several phonosemantic studies have reported this effect; however, a clear definition of the term, the description of the existing models of motive combinations, as well as possible explanations behind this phenomenon have yet to be developed. The objective of this article is to attempt to formulate the definition of this term and to describe the mechanisms of phonosemantic interference using new linguistic material (artificially constructed lexis).Methodology and sources. The study is conducted within the framework of the phonosemantic approach developed by Stanislav Voronin on the material of artificially constructed words from well-known fictional languages Lapin, Klingon, Elvish, and Navi. Methods of the research include the method of continuous sampling, typological comparison, and the method of phonosemantic analysis.Results and discussion. Using the material of artificially constructed lexis, the examples of the combination of several motives of nomination for a single sound-imitative sign are demonstrated and the motives of their coinage are studied. The typological comparison of the artificially constructed words against imitative words of natural origin has revealed similar models of multiple motivation both in artificial and natural word coinage, which suggests that multiple nomination is a regular way of primary nomination. The definition of the term phonosemantic interference has been provided.Conclusion. Multiple motivation reflects the complex nature of the intermodal perception of extralinguistic objects. In the case of phonosemantic interference, the phonetic form of a word is the product of a co-operative action of several senses. The reflection of several denotata in a single sound form increases the variety of primary forms and meanings and helps explicate subtle semantic contrasts. The notion of phonosemantic interference enables analyzing, describing, and understanding the mechanisms of complicated cases of imitative word coinage within the framework of the already well established phonosemantic taxonomy.
Author Davydova, V. A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: V. A.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4475-5267
  surname: Davydova
  fullname: Davydova, V. A.
  organization: Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University
BookMark eNo9kU9rGzEQxUVJoUma7yDoJTmo1X-vklMwaWuwaQ8tPYpZadZRWEtBuzb021e2285lhjePH8y8K3KRS0ZCPgj-UUnL1SephWSdsZJJLjmzTDNhOBNWvyGX0pqOLVpdtPmf8R25maYXzrl0QnLDL8n--3PJZcId5DkFusoz1gEr5oD3dLMf5_Q6It2UOR1gTiXTlOn8jHS1S3MTDkh_lRrpsqQMW6S35bzeQOMkGGkZGvOADRvpGvJ231zT3XvydoBxwpu__Zr8_Pz0Y_mVrb99WS0f1yyIhdAsmhhlUCYIbnoFBnVvh54LiYCGQy_64BzERad6DGoIeLR2nbSi44BOqWuyOnNjgRf_WtMO6m9fIPmTUOrWQ213j-ijAycH4dSAqDXa3nWgJedOCRFUlI31cGaFWqap4vCfJ7g_BeKPf_bHP_tjIN567VsgvgWi_gBg5oGe
Cites_doi 10.1037/h0070931
10.1017/S0332586516000147
10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88
10.1159/000261678
10.1017/CBO9780511751806.022
10.1075/ill.10.06nob
10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.013
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.32603/2412-8562-2020-6-4-150-164
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: http://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Philosophy
EISSN 2658-7777
EndPage 164
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2
10_32603_2412_8562_2020_6_4_150_164
GroupedDBID AAYXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1714-d5dd2c35c105b3a5e4b6fb012eae50ab1bc99ad783bec3fce35c18826180ae933
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2412-8562
IngestDate Mon Oct 21 19:39:06 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 23:33:33 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1714-d5dd2c35c105b3a5e4b6fb012eae50ab1bc99ad783bec3fce35c18826180ae933
ORCID 0000-0002-4475-5267
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2
crossref_primary_10_32603_2412_8562_2020_6_4_150_164
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-10-28
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-10-28
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-10-28
  day: 28
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Diskurs (Online)
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University
Publisher_xml – name: Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University
References ref13
ref35
ref12
ref34
ref15
ref37
ref14
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref11
ref33
ref10
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref39
ref16
ref38
ref19
ref18
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
References_xml – ident: ref37
– ident: ref1
– ident: ref39
– ident: ref3
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1037/h0070931
– ident: ref5
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.1017/S0332586516000147
– ident: ref20
– ident: ref29
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88
– ident: ref24
– ident: ref22
– ident: ref25
– ident: ref27
– ident: ref9
– ident: ref19
– ident: ref32
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1159/000261678
– ident: ref17
– ident: ref34
– ident: ref15
– ident: ref30
– ident: ref38
– ident: ref6
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511751806.022
– ident: ref28
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1075/ill.10.06nob
– ident: ref21
– ident: ref23
– ident: ref26
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.013
– ident: ref18
– ident: ref16
– ident: ref10
– ident: ref35
– ident: ref12
– ident: ref33
– ident: ref14
– ident: ref31
SSID ssj0002912050
Score 1.7872236
Snippet Introduction . Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by...
Introduction. Phonosemantic interference is a phenomenon in imitative word coinage in which the sound shape of a single imitative sign can be conditioned by...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
StartPage 150
SubjectTerms denotatum
fictional languages
motivation
onomatopoeia
phonosemantic interference
phonosemantics
sound symbolism
Title Phonosemantic Interference: Multiple Motivation in the Imitative Word Coinage (on the Material of Invented Languages)
URI https://doaj.org/article/d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2
Volume 6
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA7qQbyIT3wT0IMegm2SzTbefLILriyo6C3kMcU92IrrCv57J2l30ZMXr-mD8s2XzDfDdIaQo66QulsGxYRSnsmgFLMZD6zE3WW1KpxLBbK9--7dc3F1HdvkzEZ9xZqwpj1wA9xp0FbzEmVGCSAlKKcLK2NKX-S5F6E5fTP1I5iKZzDXOc_SeFb0ULjl0csvksMYoqJ-F6ezRSRJDJ-YZCiMWK7kL_f0o4t_cjc3K2S51Yn0vPm-VTIH1RpZGk4HD3ytk8nwpa7qMbwiNiNPU2qv_XnvjA7aOkE6mM0vo6OKotqj_dfUlvsT6BMGnvSyHsUCGHpcN5cH9iORktYl7aeKdAj0ts1qjk82yOPN9cNlj7VDFJiPs81Z6ITAveh4FFJO2A5Ip0qHbgksdDLrcue1tqFbCLSmKD3EW1F2q7zILGghNslCVVewRSgPjjvELwiMKnOAIisLbtGeaF0Q3m4TOcXOvDW9MgzGGAlyEyE3EXITITfKSIOQG4R8m1xEnGePxIbXaQFpYFoamL9osPMfL9klS4kP6Jp4sUcWPt4nsE_mx2FykOj1DV7xzv4
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,866,2106,27933,27934
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phonosemantic+Interference%3A+Multiple+Motivation+in+the+Imitative+Word+Coinage+%28on+the+Material+of+Invented+Languages%29&rft.jtitle=Diskurs+%28Online%29&rft.au=V.+A.+Davydova&rft.date=2020-10-28&rft.pub=Saint+Petersburg+Electrotechnical+University&rft.issn=2412-8562&rft.eissn=2658-7777&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=164&rft_id=info:doi/10.32603%2F2412-8562-2020-6-4-150-164&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_d9a92f193fee44e6b98a42009311c3d2
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2412-8562&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2412-8562&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2412-8562&client=summon