Performance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Network Methods Based on Block Machine Learning Classification
Traditional (pixel-by-pixel) classification techniques are time-consuming, whereas semantic segmentation in machine learning requires assigning class labels to each pixel in an image. This study proposes a block-by-block (5x5 chunks) segmentation method for semantic segmentation, which involves imag...
Saved in:
Published in: | AL-Rafidain journal of computer sciences and mathematics Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 111 - 123 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | Arabic English |
Published: |
Mosul University
23-12-2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Traditional (pixel-by-pixel) classification techniques are time-consuming, whereas semantic segmentation in machine learning requires assigning class labels to each pixel in an image. This study proposes a block-by-block (5x5 chunks) segmentation method for semantic segmentation, which involves image dissection, feature extraction, and model training based on specific color and textural properties. Thirty cat photos from the Oxford-IIIT Pet dataset were used for evaluation. Five different Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models, including LM, BGFGS, RP, SCG, and GDX, were trained and assessed for both pixel-based and block-based methods. The accuracy of the block-based classification ranges from 82.94% to 85.83%, surpassing the pixel-based approach, which ranges from 70.82% to 76.47%. The processing time for the models also improved with the block-based method. For the pixel-based approach, RP model takes the longest processing time i.e., 242.39 seconds, while GDX model takes the shortest processing time i.e., 49.89 seconds. For the block-based approach, LM model takes the longest processing time i.e., 13.86 seconds, while GDX still has the shortest processing time i.e., 5.98 seconds. Therefore, block-based methods can be seen as more efficient and accurate for classification models. The LM model achieved the highest accuracy on test images, ranging from 94.72% to 89.81%, while the GDX model had the lowest accuracy, ranging from 92.96% to 81.15%. The remaining models, RP, SCG, and BFG, have intermediate levels of accuracy. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Traditional (pixel-by-pixel) classification techniques are time-consuming, whereas semantic segmentation in machine learning requires assigning class labels to each pixel in an image. This study proposes a block-by-block (5x5 chunks) segmentation method for semantic segmentation, which involves image dissection, feature extraction, and model training based on specific color and textural properties. Thirty cat photos from the Oxford-IIIT Pet dataset were used for evaluation. Five different Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models, including LM, BGFGS, RP, SCG, and GDX, were trained and assessed for both pixel-based and block-based methods. The accuracy of the block-based classification ranges from 82.94% to 85.83%, surpassing the pixel-based approach, which ranges from 70.82% to 76.47%. The processing time for the models also improved with the block-based method. For the pixel-based approach, RP model takes the longest processing time i.e., 242.39 seconds, while GDX model takes the shortest processing time i.e., 49.89 seconds. For the block-based approach, LM model takes the longest processing time i.e., 13.86 seconds, while GDX still has the shortest processing time i.e., 5.98 seconds. Therefore, block-based methods can be seen as more efficient and accurate for classification models. The LM model achieved the highest accuracy on test images, ranging from 94.72% to 89.81%, while the GDX model had the lowest accuracy, ranging from 92.96% to 81.15%. The remaining models, RP, SCG, and BFG, have intermediate levels of accuracy. |
Author | Younis, Mohammed Hamdy, Raya |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Raya surname: Hamdy fullname: Hamdy, Raya – sequence: 2 givenname: Mohammed surname: Younis fullname: Younis, Mohammed |
BookMark | eNpNkctOwzAQRS0EEqX0F5B_oMWP2ImXbVWgUnksYG1N_GgT0hjZLYi_J0kRYnVHV6OjGZ0rdN6G1iF0Q8mM80KpW5P29YwRxmc0Y0yQGSW5OkMjximd5kqR83_zJZqkVBNCWJEzVdARql9c9CHuoTUOrz6hOcKhCi0OHs_jofKVqaDBT-4Yhzh8hfiOH91hF2zCC0jO4m570QTT1WB2VevwxkFsq3aLlw2k1DMG5jW68NAkN_nNMXq7W70uH6ab5_v1cr6ZGiqpmjolMmFFacH4UopSZXmpSsd4d7IVmXSKlpZ4LwjLpVe5lQJA-sJYL0mZCT5G6xPXBqj1R6z2EL91gEoPRYhbDd1rpnHaZNQoWrCcFjxTwIF4LsvCsMxLRXPeseSJZWJIKTr_x6NEDwJ0L0D3AvRJgO4F8B9eV3x- |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.33899/csmj.2023.142250.1079 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Mathematics |
EISSN | 2311-7990 |
EndPage | 123 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_c41c9182718349a3a0f36b8c24f69173 10_33899_csmj_2023_142250_1079 |
GroupedDBID | .K5 AAYXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1619-e9545d5bdacfb65b947b9be23872d546e91bd0ff50276f97d65aa6f8cdf60b453 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2311-7990 1815-4816 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:14:19 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:38:42 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | Arabic English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1619-e9545d5bdacfb65b947b9be23872d546e91bd0ff50276f97d65aa6f8cdf60b453 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/c41c9182718349a3a0f36b8c24f69173 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c41c9182718349a3a0f36b8c24f69173 crossref_primary_10_33899_csmj_2023_142250_1079 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-12-23 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-12-23 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2023 text: 2023-12-23 day: 23 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | AL-Rafidain journal of computer sciences and mathematics |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Mosul University |
Publisher_xml | – name: Mosul University |
SSID | ssj0002872981 ssib044757849 ssib026597062 ssib036241094 ssib046786262 |
Score | 2.2935119 |
Snippet | Traditional (pixel-by-pixel) classification techniques are time-consuming, whereas semantic segmentation in machine learning requires assigning class labels to... |
SourceID | doaj crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 111 |
SubjectTerms | ann classification features extraction semantic segmentation |
Title | Performance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Network Methods Based on Block Machine Learning Classification |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/c41c9182718349a3a0f36b8c24f69173 |
Volume | 17 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA66Jz2IT3yTg9e6SfNoc3R1Fy-KoIK3kqcguCtb9_87k67dvXnxVAhNaD-GzHxh8n2EXLEgnNYuFTYYWUieqsJFLgrNorGicjEwvI18_1w9vtV3Y5TJ6a2-sCeskwfugBt6yb2BIhj2UCFhumVJaFf7UiYNVKPT-WRmjUxBJJUa6mS2EsKDXVryNSKDKndVvSIesFtgZV_2pzPAI0qTHU4hA6pC1lx314sF6tENffv5cY3G49d4hKKQA2Mv2FpmWzMAyJlqskt2liUmvel-bY9s2Pk-2X7o9VnbA_LxtLovQMe94DedpTytU5WgKNyRH7lTnD5ks-mWjiDxBQpvjyARwnBux4x0qdT6TrPPJq6R1zwkr5Pxy-19sXRdKDxUf6aIBoqqoFywPjmtnJGVMy5Caq_KoKSOhrvAUlJAaHUyVdDKWp1qH5JmTipxRAbT2TQeE2oSk5azwLz0UtTSxeR4VNoELqOz4YQMfxFrvjpxjQZISca4QYwbxLjpMG4Q4xMyQmD7t1EcOw9AyDTLkGn-CpnT_1jkjGzhx2FnSynOyeB7vogXZLMNi8scij_Sx9i_ |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,867,2109,27936,27937 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance+Evaluation+of+Artificial+Neural+Network+Methods+Based+on+Block+Machine+Learning+Classification&rft.jtitle=AL-Rafidain+journal+of+computer+sciences+and+mathematics&rft.au=Hamdy%2C+Raya&rft.au=Younis%2C+Mohammed&rft.date=2023-12-23&rft.issn=2311-7990&rft.eissn=2311-7990&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=123&rft_id=info:doi/10.33899%2Fcsmj.2023.142250.1079&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_33899_csmj_2023_142250_1079 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2311-7990&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2311-7990&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2311-7990&client=summon |