Psychoacoustic dynamic range and cochlear implant speech‐perception performance in Nucleus 22 users
Background Cochlear implant speech processors compress a wide acoustical dynamic range of sounds into a smaller electrical dynamic range. Some patients show wider electrical dynamic ranges than others and most of them have good speech perception performance. The knowledge of the average psycho‐acous...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cochlear implants international Vol. 6; no. S1; pp. 31 - 34 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01-09-2005
|
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Cochlear implant speech processors compress a wide acoustical dynamic range of sounds into a smaller electrical dynamic range. Some patients show wider electrical dynamic ranges than others and most of them have good speech perception performance. The knowledge of the average psycho‐acoustical dynamic range in adults will help the audiologist program children who do not give reliable responses.
Aim
This study was conducted to analyse the dynamic ranges of experienced Nucleus 22 cochlear implant users with good speech‐perception and patients with poor speech‐perception performances.
Method
Thirty‐one maps of adult subjects with Nucleus 22 cochlear implants using the SPEAK processing strategy, in bipolar stimulation were analysed. By the time of this study, all of them had used a cochlear implant for over a year. They were divided into two groups: group 1, composed of those with good speech perception for sentences (better than 80%), and group 2, composed of those with speech perception results for sentences worse than 70%.
Results
Results showed that both dynamic ranges were wide in the two groups (average 50 units).
Conclusion
Although dynamic ranges vary among subjects and electrodes, a lower variability was observed within the group of patients with better speech perception. Copyright © 2005 Whurr Publishers, Ltd. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1467-0100 1556-9152 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cii.279 |