No Clear Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Knotted and Knotless Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review
To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair. A comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clini...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Arthroscopy |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
26-06-2024
|
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair.
A comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of Bankart repair using knotless and knot-tying techniques were included in the study. In vitro, animal, and Level IV and V studies were excluded. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was calculated according to the RoB 2 tool, and for nonrandomized studies, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan software.
A total of 9 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized comparative studies involving 720 patients, were included in the systematic review. The ROWE score ranged from 81.7 to 94.3 in the knot-tying group and 86 to 96.3 in the knotless group. Visual Analog Scale scores at the final follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 in the knot-tying group and 0.7 to 2.5 in the knotless group. The rate of redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery in the knot-tying group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, 16.7% to 29.7%, and 1.6% to 17.6%, respectively, whereas that in the knotless group ranged from 2.4% to 23.8%, 7.4% to 22.2%, and 2.4% to 19%, respectively. The mean external rotation was 54° to 65° in the knot-tying group and 61° to 99° in the knotless group. The mean forward-flexion was 164 to 172 in the knot-tying group and 165 to 174 in the knotless group. Our subjective synthesis does not reveal any difference in the outcome between the 2 groups.
The available literature does not demonstrate a clear difference in functional outcomes, residual pain, and rate of complications as redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery between Bankart repairs performed with knotted and knotless anchors.
Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair.
A comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of Bankart repair using knotless and knot-tying techniques were included in the study. In vitro, animal, and Level IV and V studies were excluded. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was calculated according to the RoB 2 tool, and for nonrandomized studies, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan software.
A total of 9 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized comparative studies involving 720 patients, were included in the systematic review. The ROWE score ranged from 81.7 to 94.3 in the knot-tying group and 86 to 96.3 in the knotless group. Visual Analog Scale scores at the final follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 in the knot-tying group and 0.7 to 2.5 in the knotless group. The rate of redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery in the knot-tying group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, 16.7% to 29.7%, and 1.6% to 17.6%, respectively, whereas that in the knotless group ranged from 2.4% to 23.8%, 7.4% to 22.2%, and 2.4% to 19%, respectively. The mean external rotation was 54° to 65° in the knot-tying group and 61° to 99° in the knotless group. The mean forward-flexion was 164 to 172 in the knot-tying group and 165 to 174 in the knotless group. Our subjective synthesis does not reveal any difference in the outcome between the 2 groups.
The available literature does not demonstrate a clear difference in functional outcomes, residual pain, and rate of complications as redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery between Bankart repairs performed with knotted and knotless anchors.
Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies. To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair. A comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of Bankart repair using knotless and knot-tying techniques were included in the study. In vitro, animal, and Level IV and V studies were excluded. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was calculated according to the RoB 2 tool, and for nonrandomized studies, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan software. A total of 9 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized comparative studies involving 720 patients, were included in the systematic review. The ROWE score ranged from 81.7 to 94.3 in the knot-tying group and 86 to 96.3 in the knotless group. Visual Analog Scale scores at the final follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 in the knot-tying group and 0.7 to 2.5 in the knotless group. The rate of redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery in the knot-tying group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, 16.7% to 29.7%, and 1.6% to 17.6%, respectively, whereas that in the knotless group ranged from 2.4% to 23.8%, 7.4% to 22.2%, and 2.4% to 19%, respectively. The mean external rotation was 54° to 65° in the knot-tying group and 61° to 99° in the knotless group. The mean forward-flexion was 164 to 172 in the knot-tying group and 165 to 174 in the knotless group. Our subjective synthesis does not reveal any difference in the outcome between the 2 groups. The available literature does not demonstrate a clear difference in functional outcomes, residual pain, and rate of complications as redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery between Bankart repairs performed with knotted and knotless anchors. Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair.PURPOSETo analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair.A comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of Bankart repair using knotless and knot-tying techniques were included in the study. In vitro, animal, and Level IV and V studies were excluded. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was calculated according to the RoB 2 tool, and for nonrandomized studies, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan software.METHODSA comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of Bankart repair using knotless and knot-tying techniques were included in the study. In vitro, animal, and Level IV and V studies were excluded. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was calculated according to the RoB 2 tool, and for nonrandomized studies, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan software.A total of 9 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized comparative studies involving 720 patients, were included in the systematic review. The ROWE score ranged from 81.7 to 94.3 in the knot-tying group and 86 to 96.3 in the knotless group. Visual Analog Scale scores at the final follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 in the knot-tying group and 0.7 to 2.5 in the knotless group. The rate of redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery in the knot-tying group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, 16.7% to 29.7%, and 1.6% to 17.6%, respectively, whereas that in the knotless group ranged from 2.4% to 23.8%, 7.4% to 22.2%, and 2.4% to 19%, respectively. The mean external rotation was 54° to 65° in the knot-tying group and 61° to 99° in the knotless group. The mean forward-flexion was 164 to 172 in the knot-tying group and 165 to 174 in the knotless group. Our subjective synthesis does not reveal any difference in the outcome between the 2 groups.RESULTSA total of 9 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized comparative studies involving 720 patients, were included in the systematic review. The ROWE score ranged from 81.7 to 94.3 in the knot-tying group and 86 to 96.3 in the knotless group. Visual Analog Scale scores at the final follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 in the knot-tying group and 0.7 to 2.5 in the knotless group. The rate of redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery in the knot-tying group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, 16.7% to 29.7%, and 1.6% to 17.6%, respectively, whereas that in the knotless group ranged from 2.4% to 23.8%, 7.4% to 22.2%, and 2.4% to 19%, respectively. The mean external rotation was 54° to 65° in the knot-tying group and 61° to 99° in the knotless group. The mean forward-flexion was 164 to 172 in the knot-tying group and 165 to 174 in the knotless group. Our subjective synthesis does not reveal any difference in the outcome between the 2 groups.The available literature does not demonstrate a clear difference in functional outcomes, residual pain, and rate of complications as redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery between Bankart repairs performed with knotted and knotless anchors.CONCLUSIONSThe available literature does not demonstrate a clear difference in functional outcomes, residual pain, and rate of complications as redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery between Bankart repairs performed with knotted and knotless anchors.Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies.LEVEL OF EVIDENCELevel III, systematic review of Level I to III studies. |
| Author | Jain, Gunjar Datt, Rameshwar Krishna, Anant Morankar, Rahul Patro, Bishnu Prasad |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gunjar orcidid: 0000-0002-3458-189X surname: Jain fullname: Jain, Gunjar organization: Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India – sequence: 2 givenname: Rameshwar orcidid: 0000-0002-3906-4007 surname: Datt fullname: Datt, Rameshwar email: rameshwar5189@gmail.com organization: Department of Orthopaedics, ESI-PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India – sequence: 3 givenname: Anant surname: Krishna fullname: Krishna, Anant organization: Department of Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Medical College & Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital, New Delhi, India – sequence: 4 givenname: Bishnu Prasad orcidid: 0000-0001-9497-9624 surname: Patro fullname: Patro, Bishnu Prasad organization: Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India – sequence: 5 givenname: Rahul surname: Morankar fullname: Morankar, Rahul organization: Division of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38942097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kE9v1DAQxS1URLeFb4CQj1wSxnYSJxyQtstfUVGpwNly7Inwkthb29uq3x5vt3DkZHv8Zt683xk58cEjIS8Z1AxY92Zb65h_xVBz4E0NbQ2ie0JWrOVdJbhgJ2QFshmqHjpxSs5S2gKAEL14Rk5FPzQcBrkit98C3cyoI33vpgkjeoPU-VJz3hk906t9NmHBRC8w3yF6-tWHnNFS7e3DfcaU6PphlWTCzhl6of3vshu9xp128S1d0-_3KeOic_m8xluHd8_J00nPCV88nufk58cPPzafq8urT18268vKsLaTFZNymFqrrWScTwPChOXRaiN7M6JBwUcYBZ9a2YhuNKO0vW4kWCsHIwBbcU5eH-fuYrjZY8pqccngPGuPYZ-UACm6VjScF2lzlJoSJEWc1C66Rcd7xUAdiKutOhJXB-IKWlWIl7ZXjw77cUH7r-kv4iJ4dxRgyVmyR5WMO2C2LqLJygb3f4c_of2XRQ |
| Cites_doi | 10.1186/s12891-018-2164-x 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.016 10.1016/j.aott.2019.04.003 10.2106/00004623-200608000-00010 10.1007/s00167-012-2140-1 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.011 10.1007/s00167-009-0811-3 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.08.011 10.1097/00003086-200109000-00007 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.8.743 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.03.009 10.2307/2529310 10.1007/s00402-016-2553-2 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.005 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.01.014 10.1177/0363546508324312 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.010 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.005 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.10.012 10.1007/s00167-020-06057-7 10.1177/03635465010290051901 10.1177/03635465221107939 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.005 10.1177/0363546514535554 10.1007/s00167-022-06969-6 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.02.008 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000962 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102944 10.1007/s00167-010-1093-5 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.017 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.056 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.039 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America – notice: Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036 |
| DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 1526-3231 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_arthro_2024_05_036 38942097 S074980632400464X |
| Genre | Journal Article Review |
| GroupedDBID | --K .1- .FO .GJ 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~5 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO ABLJU ABMAC ADBBV ADMUD ADPAM AEVXI AFCTW AFRHN AFTJW AHHHB AITUG AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY C5W CAG COF EBS EFJIC EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB G-2 GBLVA HEE HEK HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M28 M31 M41 MO0 N9A NQ- O9- OF~ OR- R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SEL SES SEW SJN SSZ UHS UV1 WUQ XH2 YCJ Z5R ZXP AFJKZ NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1567-1779f5dad7122f9e0fedad5ac78cbece32b0b32f57436bcb7d8a470dd79c30e53 |
| ISSN | 0749-8063 1526-3231 |
| IngestDate | Sat Oct 26 04:16:41 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 20:36:16 EDT 2024 Sat Nov 02 12:26:43 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 15:42:07 EDT 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1567-1779f5dad7122f9e0fedad5ac78cbece32b0b32f57436bcb7d8a470dd79c30e53 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3906-4007 0000-0002-3458-189X 0000-0001-9497-9624 |
| PMID | 38942097 |
| PQID | 3073653422 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3073653422 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2024_05_036 pubmed_primary_38942097 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_arthro_2024_05_036 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-Jun-26 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-06-26 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2024 text: 2024-Jun-26 day: 26 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Arthroscopy |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Arthroscopy |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
| References | Ranawat, Golish, Miller (bib12) 2011; 40 Thal (bib9) 2001; 29 Thal (bib10) 2001 Cho, Lubis, Ha (bib27) 2006; 22 Kim, Crater, Hargens (bib7) 2013; 29 Chen, Novikov, Kaplan, Meislin (bib45) 2016; 32 Menendez, Sudah, Cohn (bib32) 2022; 50 Aydin, Karaismailoglu, Harbiyeli, Ozsahin (bib38) 2019; 53 Randelli, Ragone, Carminati (bib2) 2012; 20 Landis, Koch (bib19) 1977; 33 Leedle, Miller (bib11) 2005; 21 Park, Lhee, Park (bib43) 2009; 37 Hanypsiak, DeLong, Simmons (bib3) 2014; 42 Matache, Hurley, Kanakamedala (bib13) 2021; 37 Shim JW, Jung TW, Kim IS, et al. Knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors for arthroscopic Bankart repair: A comparative study. Yonsei Med J 202;62:743-749. Witney-Lagen, Perera, Rubin, Venkateswaran (bib37) 2014; 23 Edwin, Morris, Ahmed (bib8) 2018; 19 Brown, Rothermel, Joshi (bib42) 2017; 33 Boileau, Villalba, Héry (bib5) 2006; 88 Waltz, Wong, Peebles (bib30) 2021; 37 (bib46) 2023 Kocaoglu, Guven, Nalbantoglu (bib26) 2009; 17 Lacroix, Commeil, Chauveaux (bib4) 2021; 107 Xu, Chen, Hao (bib29) 2020; 22 Algarni (bib41) 2020; 27 Nakagawa (bib40) 2019; 35 Cote, Lubowitz, Rossi, Brand (bib20) 2018; 34 Boileau, Villalba, Hery, Balg, Ahrens, Neyton (bib39) 2006; 88 Bents, Brady, Adams (bib23) 2017; 46 Petrera, Patella, Patella (bib6) 2010; 18 Balke, Shafizadeh, Bouillon (bib28) 2016; 136 Mei, Sheth, Abouali (bib14) 2021; 3 Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff (bib15) 2009; 151 Houck, Hart, Schumacher (bib34) 2019; 7 Saccomanno, Cerciello, Adriani (bib16) 2022; 30 Saper, Courson, Milchteim (bib1) 2022; 32 Reeves, Deeks, Higgins (bib18) 2019 Michelin, Gornick, Schlechter (bib35) 2022; 10 Kang, Frank, Nho (bib36) 2009; 25 Aydin, Unal, Asansu, Tok (bib44) 2017; 25 Ng, Kumar (bib24) 2014; 30 Kim, Lu, Oh, Bahng, Park (bib25) 2013; 17 Wu, Desai, Mangold (bib22) 2021; 29 Fox, Drain, Rai (bib31) 2023; 39 Ghetti, Michelin, Fogleman (bib33) 2022; 10 Lobo, Conforto Gracitelli, Malavolta (bib17) 2022; 38 Hanypsiak (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib3) 2014; 42 Fox (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib31) 2023; 39 Kang (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib36) 2009; 25 Edwin (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib8) 2018; 19 Leedle (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib11) 2005; 21 Cote (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib20) 2018; 34 Lacroix (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib4) 2021; 107 Landis (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib19) 1977; 33 Wu (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib22) 2021; 29 Boileau (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib39) 2006; 88 Algarni (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib41) 2020; 27 Chen (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib45) 2016; 32 Randelli (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib2) 2012; 20 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib21 Waltz (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib30) 2021; 37 Michelin (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib35) 2022; 10 Ng (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib24) 2014; 30 Reeves (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib18) 2019 Kim (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib25) 2013; 17 Park (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib43) 2009; 37 (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib46) 2023 Saccomanno (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib16) 2022; 30 Kim (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib7) 2013; 29 Ranawat (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib12) 2011; 40 Menendez (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib32) 2022; 50 Aydin (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib38) 2019; 53 Aydin (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib44) 2017; 25 Witney-Lagen (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib37) 2014; 23 Boileau (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib5) 2006; 88 Kocaoglu (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib26) 2009; 17 Matache (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib13) 2021; 37 Mei (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib14) 2021; 3 Balke (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib28) 2016; 136 Thal (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib9) 2001; 29 Bents (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib23) 2017; 46 Cho (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib27) 2006; 22 Ghetti (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib33) 2022; 10 Saper (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib1) 2022; 32 Xu (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib29) 2020; 22 Thal (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib10) 2001 Moher (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib15) 2009; 151 Lobo (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib17) 2022; 38 Brown (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib42) 2017; 33 Petrera (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib6) 2010; 18 Houck (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib34) 2019; 7 Nakagawa (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib40) 2019; 35 |
| References_xml | – volume: 22 start-page: 1276 year: 2006 end-page: 1282 ident: bib27 article-title: Clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with knot-tying and knotless suture anchors publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Ha – volume: 30 start-page: 422 year: 2014 end-page: 427 ident: bib24 article-title: Arthroscopic Bankart repair using knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors: Is there a difference? publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Kumar – year: 2023 ident: bib46 publication-title: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023) – volume: 18 start-page: 1742 year: 2010 end-page: 1747 ident: bib6 article-title: A meta-analysis of open versus arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc contributor: fullname: Patella – volume: 37 start-page: 1314 year: 2021 end-page: 1321 ident: bib13 article-title: Knotted versus knotless anchors for labral repair in the shoulder: A systematic review publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Kanakamedala – volume: 25 start-page: 909 year: 2009 end-page: 920 ident: bib36 article-title: Complications associated with anterior shoulder instability repair publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Nho – volume: 38 start-page: 1812 year: 2022 end-page: 1823 ident: bib17 article-title: No clinical or radiographic difference seen in arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotted versus knotless suture anchors: A randomized controlled trial at short-term follow-up publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Malavolta – volume: 21 start-page: 81 year: 2005 end-page: 85 ident: bib11 article-title: Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Miller – volume: 136 start-page: 1717 year: 2016 end-page: 1721 ident: bib28 article-title: Management of shoulder instability: The current state of treatment among German orthopaedic surgeons publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg contributor: fullname: Bouillon – volume: 37 start-page: 360 year: 2009 end-page: 370 ident: bib43 article-title: Perianchor radiolucency after knotless anchor repair for shoulder instability: Correlation with clinical results of 69 cases publication-title: Am J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Park – volume: 39 start-page: 682 year: 2023 end-page: 688 ident: bib31 article-title: Increased failure rates after arthroscopic Bankart repair after second dislocation compared to primary dislocation with comparable clinical outcomes publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Rai – volume: 42 start-page: 1978 year: 2014 end-page: 1984 ident: bib3 article-title: Knot strength varies widely among expert arthroscopists publication-title: Am J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Simmons – start-page: 595 year: 2019 end-page: 620 ident: bib18 article-title: Including non-randomized studies on intervention effects publication-title: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions contributor: fullname: Higgins – volume: 53 start-page: 266 year: 2019 end-page: 271 ident: bib38 article-title: Can capsular plication compensate the lack of one suture anchor in an arthroscopic three suture anchor Bankart repair? A comparative study publication-title: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc contributor: fullname: Ozsahin – volume: 88 start-page: 1755 year: 2006 end-page: 1763 ident: bib39 article-title: Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am contributor: fullname: Neyton – volume: 46 start-page: 279 year: 2017 end-page: 283 ident: bib23 article-title: Patient-reported outcomes of knotted and knotless glenohumeral labral repairs are equivalent publication-title: Am J Orthop contributor: fullname: Adams – volume: 37 start-page: 3266 year: 2021 end-page: 3274 ident: bib30 article-title: Postoperative stiffness and pain after arthroscopic labral stabilization: Consider anchor arthropathy publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Peebles – volume: 29 start-page: 2077 year: 2021 end-page: 2084 ident: bib22 article-title: Comparable clinical outcomes using knotless and knot-tying anchors for arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability at mean 5-year follow-up publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc contributor: fullname: Mangold – volume: 10 year: 2022 ident: bib33 article-title: Paper 59: Comparison of knotless versus knotted suture anchors in the arthroscopic management of adolescent shoulder instability publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Fogleman – volume: 7 year: 2019 ident: bib34 article-title: Comparison of knotless versus traditional glenoid anchors in early outcomes following arthroscopic shoulder stabilization publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Schumacher – volume: 30 start-page: 3835 year: 2022 end-page: 3841 ident: bib16 article-title: Knotless PEEK and double-loaded biodegradable suture anchors ensure comparable clinical outcomes in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a prospective randomized study publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc contributor: fullname: Adriani – volume: 22 start-page: 242 year: 2020 end-page: 245 ident: bib29 article-title: Threshold scores for treatment success after arthroscopic Bankart repair using Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, Constant–Murley Score, and UCLA Shoulder Score publication-title: J Orthop contributor: fullname: Hao – volume: 25 year: 2017 ident: bib44 article-title: Concomitant SLAP repair does not influence the surgical outcome for arthroscopic Bankart repair of traumatic shoulder dislocations publication-title: J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) contributor: fullname: Tok – volume: 34 start-page: 3126 year: 2018 end-page: 3128 ident: bib20 article-title: Reviews pooling heterogeneous, low-evidence, high-bias data result in incorrect conclusions: But reviews pooling heterogeneous, low-evidence, high-bias data result in incorrect conclusions: But heterogeneity is an opportunity to explore publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Brand – volume: 27 start-page: 202 year: 2020 end-page: 207 ident: bib41 article-title: Arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotless suture anchors: A comparison of the permanent and absorbable types publication-title: J Orthop Trauma Rehabil contributor: fullname: Algarni – volume: 17 start-page: 50 year: 2013 end-page: 55 ident: bib25 article-title: Clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with absorbable knot-tying and absorbable knotless suture anchors publication-title: J Korean Arthrosc Soc contributor: fullname: Park – volume: 29 start-page: 485 year: 2013 end-page: 490 ident: bib7 article-title: Movement-induced knot migration after anterior stabilization in the shoulder publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Hargens – volume: 23 start-page: 382 year: 2014 end-page: 387 ident: bib37 article-title: Fewer anchors achieve successful arthroscopic shoulder stabilization surgery: 114 patients with 4 years of follow-up publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg contributor: fullname: Venkateswaran – volume: 40 start-page: 134 year: 2011 end-page: 138 ident: bib12 article-title: Modes of failure of knotted and knotless suture anchors in an arthroscopic Bankart repair model with the capsulolabral tissues intact publication-title: Am J Orthop contributor: fullname: Miller – volume: 33 start-page: 159 year: 1977 end-page: 174 ident: bib19 article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data publication-title: Biometrics contributor: fullname: Koch – volume: 88 start-page: 1755 year: 2006 end-page: 1763 ident: bib5 article-title: Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am contributor: fullname: Héry – volume: 35 start-page: 2509 year: 2019 end-page: 2511 ident: bib40 article-title: Editorial commentary: Is arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors on the glenoid appropriate treatment for traumatic anterior shoulder instability? publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Nakagawa – volume: 107 year: 2021 ident: bib4 article-title: Learning and optimizing arthroscopic knot-tying by surgery residents using procedural simulation publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res contributor: fullname: Chauveaux – volume: 20 start-page: 2129 year: 2012 end-page: 2138 ident: bib2 article-title: Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair a systematic review publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc contributor: fullname: Carminati – volume: 32 start-page: 1415 year: 2016 end-page: 1420 ident: bib45 article-title: Effect of additional sutures per suture anchor in arthroscopic Bankart repair: A review of single-loaded versus double-loaded suture anchors publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Meislin – volume: 10 year: 2022 ident: bib35 article-title: Arthroscopic labral repair of adolescent athlete shoulder instability with knotted versus knotless suture anchors publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Schlechter – volume: 32 start-page: e288 year: 2022 end-page: e292 ident: bib1 article-title: Successful outcomes and return to sport after arthroscopic Bankart repair in National Collegiate Athletic Association and National Football League Football players publication-title: Clin J Sport Med contributor: fullname: Milchteim – volume: 17 start-page: 844 year: 2009 end-page: 849 ident: bib26 article-title: No difference between knotless sutures and suture anchors in arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesions in collision athletes publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc contributor: fullname: Nalbantoglu – start-page: 42 year: 2001 end-page: 51 ident: bib10 article-title: Knotless suture anchor: Arthroscopic Bankart repair without tying knots publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res contributor: fullname: Thal – volume: 33 start-page: 2081 year: 2017 end-page: 2092 ident: bib42 article-title: Recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction: A systematic review of surgical technical factors publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Joshi – volume: 3 start-page: e927 year: 2021 end-page: e938 ident: bib14 article-title: Excellent functional outcomes and low complication rates following knotless arthroscopic bankart repair: A systematic review of clinical and biomechanical studies publication-title: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil contributor: fullname: Abouali – volume: 29 start-page: 646 year: 2001 end-page: 649 ident: bib9 article-title: A knotless suture anchor. Design, function, and biomechanical testing publication-title: Am J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Thal – volume: 151 start-page: 264 year: 2009 end-page: 269 ident: bib15 article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement publication-title: Ann Intern Med contributor: fullname: Tetzlaff – volume: 19 start-page: 226 year: 2018 ident: bib8 article-title: Arthroscopic knotless anterior labral stabilization using labral tape and wide awake anaesthesia-short term results publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord contributor: fullname: Ahmed – volume: 50 start-page: 2761 year: 2022 end-page: 2766 ident: bib32 article-title: Defining minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state after the latarjet procedure publication-title: Am J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Cohn – volume: 19 start-page: 226 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib8 article-title: Arthroscopic knotless anterior labral stabilization using labral tape and wide awake anaesthesia-short term results publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2164-x contributor: fullname: Edwin – start-page: 595 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib18 article-title: Including non-randomized studies on intervention effects contributor: fullname: Reeves – volume: 22 start-page: 242 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib29 article-title: Threshold scores for treatment success after arthroscopic Bankart repair using Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, Constant–Murley Score, and UCLA Shoulder Score publication-title: J Orthop contributor: fullname: Xu – volume: 37 start-page: 3266 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib30 article-title: Postoperative stiffness and pain after arthroscopic labral stabilization: Consider anchor arthropathy publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.016 contributor: fullname: Waltz – volume: 53 start-page: 266 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib38 article-title: Can capsular plication compensate the lack of one suture anchor in an arthroscopic three suture anchor Bankart repair? A comparative study publication-title: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.04.003 contributor: fullname: Aydin – volume: 88 start-page: 1755 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib39 article-title: Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/00004623-200608000-00010 contributor: fullname: Boileau – volume: 20 start-page: 2129 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib2 article-title: Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair a systematic review publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2140-1 contributor: fullname: Randelli – volume: 29 start-page: 485 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib7 article-title: Movement-induced knot migration after anterior stabilization in the shoulder publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.011 contributor: fullname: Kim – volume: 33 start-page: 2081 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib42 article-title: Recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction: A systematic review of surgical technical factors publication-title: Arthroscopy contributor: fullname: Brown – volume: 17 start-page: 844 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib26 article-title: No difference between knotless sutures and suture anchors in arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesions in collision athletes publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0811-3 contributor: fullname: Kocaoglu – volume: 21 start-page: 81 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib11 article-title: Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.08.011 contributor: fullname: Leedle – start-page: 42 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib10 article-title: Knotless suture anchor: Arthroscopic Bankart repair without tying knots publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1097/00003086-200109000-00007 contributor: fullname: Thal – ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib21 doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.8.743 – volume: 46 start-page: 279 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib23 article-title: Patient-reported outcomes of knotted and knotless glenohumeral labral repairs are equivalent publication-title: Am J Orthop contributor: fullname: Bents – volume: 25 start-page: 909 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib36 article-title: Complications associated with anterior shoulder instability repair publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.03.009 contributor: fullname: Kang – year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib46 – volume: 33 start-page: 159 year: 1977 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib19 article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data publication-title: Biometrics doi: 10.2307/2529310 contributor: fullname: Landis – volume: 136 start-page: 1717 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib28 article-title: Management of shoulder instability: The current state of treatment among German orthopaedic surgeons publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2553-2 contributor: fullname: Balke – volume: 30 start-page: 422 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib24 article-title: Arthroscopic Bankart repair using knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors: Is there a difference? publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.005 contributor: fullname: Ng – volume: 25 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib44 article-title: Concomitant SLAP repair does not influence the surgical outcome for arthroscopic Bankart repair of traumatic shoulder dislocations publication-title: J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) contributor: fullname: Aydin – volume: 3 start-page: e927 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib14 article-title: Excellent functional outcomes and low complication rates following knotless arthroscopic bankart repair: A systematic review of clinical and biomechanical studies publication-title: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.01.014 contributor: fullname: Mei – volume: 7 issue: suppl 5 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib34 article-title: Comparison of knotless versus traditional glenoid anchors in early outcomes following arthroscopic shoulder stabilization publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Houck – volume: 37 start-page: 360 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib43 article-title: Perianchor radiolucency after knotless anchor repair for shoulder instability: Correlation with clinical results of 69 cases publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546508324312 contributor: fullname: Park – volume: 151 start-page: 264 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib15 article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 contributor: fullname: Moher – volume: 23 start-page: 382 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib37 article-title: Fewer anchors achieve successful arthroscopic shoulder stabilization surgery: 114 patients with 4 years of follow-up publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.010 contributor: fullname: Witney-Lagen – volume: 34 start-page: 3126 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib20 article-title: Reviews pooling heterogeneous, low-evidence, high-bias data result in incorrect conclusions: But reviews pooling heterogeneous, low-evidence, high-bias data result in incorrect conclusions: But heterogeneity is an opportunity to explore publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.005 contributor: fullname: Cote – volume: 88 start-page: 1755 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib5 article-title: Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/00004623-200608000-00010 contributor: fullname: Boileau – volume: 39 start-page: 682 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib31 article-title: Increased failure rates after arthroscopic Bankart repair after second dislocation compared to primary dislocation with comparable clinical outcomes publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.10.012 contributor: fullname: Fox – volume: 40 start-page: 134 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib12 article-title: Modes of failure of knotted and knotless suture anchors in an arthroscopic Bankart repair model with the capsulolabral tissues intact publication-title: Am J Orthop contributor: fullname: Ranawat – volume: 27 start-page: 202 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib41 article-title: Arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotless suture anchors: A comparison of the permanent and absorbable types publication-title: J Orthop Trauma Rehabil contributor: fullname: Algarni – volume: 29 start-page: 2077 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib22 article-title: Comparable clinical outcomes using knotless and knot-tying anchors for arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability at mean 5-year follow-up publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06057-7 contributor: fullname: Wu – volume: 10 issue: suppl 5 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib33 article-title: Paper 59: Comparison of knotless versus knotted suture anchors in the arthroscopic management of adolescent shoulder instability publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Ghetti – volume: 10 issue: suppl 5 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib35 article-title: Arthroscopic labral repair of adolescent athlete shoulder instability with knotted versus knotless suture anchors publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med contributor: fullname: Michelin – volume: 29 start-page: 646 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib9 article-title: A knotless suture anchor. Design, function, and biomechanical testing publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/03635465010290051901 contributor: fullname: Thal – volume: 50 start-page: 2761 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib32 article-title: Defining minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state after the latarjet procedure publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/03635465221107939 contributor: fullname: Menendez – volume: 22 start-page: 1276 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib27 article-title: Clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with knot-tying and knotless suture anchors publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.005 contributor: fullname: Cho – volume: 42 start-page: 1978 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib3 article-title: Knot strength varies widely among expert arthroscopists publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546514535554 contributor: fullname: Hanypsiak – volume: 30 start-page: 3835 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib16 article-title: Knotless PEEK and double-loaded biodegradable suture anchors ensure comparable clinical outcomes in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a prospective randomized study publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06969-6 contributor: fullname: Saccomanno – volume: 32 start-page: 1415 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib45 article-title: Effect of additional sutures per suture anchor in arthroscopic Bankart repair: A review of single-loaded versus double-loaded suture anchors publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.02.008 contributor: fullname: Chen – volume: 32 start-page: e288 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib1 article-title: Successful outcomes and return to sport after arthroscopic Bankart repair in National Collegiate Athletic Association and National Football League Football players publication-title: Clin J Sport Med doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000962 contributor: fullname: Saper – volume: 107 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib4 article-title: Learning and optimizing arthroscopic knot-tying by surgery residents using procedural simulation publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102944 contributor: fullname: Lacroix – volume: 18 start-page: 1742 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib6 article-title: A meta-analysis of open versus arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1093-5 contributor: fullname: Petrera – volume: 38 start-page: 1812 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib17 article-title: No clinical or radiographic difference seen in arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotted versus knotless suture anchors: A randomized controlled trial at short-term follow-up publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.017 contributor: fullname: Lobo – volume: 17 start-page: 50 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib25 article-title: Clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with absorbable knot-tying and absorbable knotless suture anchors publication-title: J Korean Arthrosc Soc contributor: fullname: Kim – volume: 37 start-page: 1314 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib13 article-title: Knotted versus knotless anchors for labral repair in the shoulder: A systematic review publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.056 contributor: fullname: Matache – volume: 35 start-page: 2509 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036_bib40 article-title: Editorial commentary: Is arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors on the glenoid appropriate treatment for traumatic anterior shoulder instability? publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.039 contributor: fullname: Nakagawa |
| SSID | ssj0003383 |
| Score | 2.4826512 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| Title | No Clear Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Knotted and Knotless Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38942097 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3073653422 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pa9swFBZpd9lldOxXtm5osFtwsWUpsndL2qyFQQZNB2UXIdkyTTrskcTdv9_3LMvOVsq6wS7GlrHk6H15epK-75mQDylMuaKcRYHmHCU5OgsSiGMDAHQUm1hwk6Ia-Wwh55fJyYzPBgPPtujL_quloQxsjcrZv7B2VykUwDnYHI5gdTg-yO7zanSMn4IAZ1b4HLKo7PMKyC_1Fpq1m9G0ZWh9Lqsthp24go7n39H3Tdb4_QSUrCyz0VSX19ASBut6uXZa9kWfAXpne6FLZ-uf7hk62iUrOK3Lle4IwSfa7U2dI1f36md_A33PlZOrTZCq0-90bZ0wZ4r3a0y3tNH57tIF40ixcvp4t57mNTW_UD4hpklh3HRu746Dd2sNqyPd_JAjrLXJvBr_lk-7GaEXWBdWhURZPuaXe-QRA4eE_vCbOO9G7LhL1-pa9hLLhgd4t6X7Qpj7pihNqHJxQJ60cww6ceB4Sga2fEZu5hVtgEF7YNBlST0wqAcGbYFBW2BQAAb1wKC7wKAtMKgDxkc6oT0sqIPFc_L10-zi-CxoP7oRZDCVx4ShMi1ErnMZMVakNiwsXAidySSD_7uNmQlNzAoBoefYZEbmieYyzHOZZnFoRfyC7JdVaV8RCpdGmCQNRZjzQoPnL0ItI255ZsZJkgxJ4PtR_XC5VZQnHa6U63eF_a5CoaDfh0T6zlZtfOjiPgXo-MOT771tFLhP3BPTpa3qjcIhbixiztiQvHRG694FYnnOwlS-_ud235DHPe4Pyf52Xdu3ZG-T1-8aBN4CRHGf5Q |
| link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,27933,27934 |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No+Clear+Difference+in+Clinical+Outcomes+Between+Knotted+and+Knotless+Arthroscopic+Bankart+Repair%3A+A+Systematic+Review&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Jain%2C+Gunjar&rft.au=Datt%2C+Rameshwar&rft.au=Krishna%2C+Anant&rft.au=Patro%2C+Bishnu+Prasad&rft.date=2024-06-26&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.arthro.2024.05.036&rft.externalDocID=S074980632400464X |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0749-8063&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0749-8063&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0749-8063&client=summon |