71. Cerebellum modulates defensive response within the peripersonal space

We evaluated the role of cerebellum in defensive responses, by recording the Hand Blink Reflex (HBR) and modulating cerebellar activity with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). The active electrode was centered on the median line 2 cm below the inion and the return one over the right sho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical neurophysiology Vol. 127; no. 12; pp. e340 - e341
Main Authors: Barloscio, D, Parenti, L, Bartolotta, M, Vergari, M, Ferrucci, R, Priori, A, Santarcangelo, E, Di Rollo, A, Carli, G, Sartucci, F, Bocci, T
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01-12-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We evaluated the role of cerebellum in defensive responses, by recording the Hand Blink Reflex (HBR) and modulating cerebellar activity with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). The active electrode was centered on the median line 2 cm below the inion and the return one over the right shoulder. Direct current was applied for 20 min with an intensity of 1.5 mA, both for cathodal and anodal stimulation. For the recording of HBR, we stimulated electrically the median nerve at the wrist and recorded EMG activity from the orbicularis oculi muscle bilaterally. Depending on the hand position respective to the face, we assessed four different conditions: “hand-far”, “hand-near” (eyes-open), “hand-side”, “hand-near” (eyes-closed). EMG signals were high-pass filtered (55 Hz), full-wave rectified, and averaged separately for the four conditions at the ipsilateral and contralateral recording sides. The anodal stimulation reduces the magnitude of the HBR, as measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC), and increased the HBR latency in the “hand-side” and “hand-near” (eyes-closed) conditions (HBR magnitude: p = 0.004 and p < 0.0001; HBR latency: p = 0.023 and 0.002, respectively). These results support a critical role of the cerebellum in the defensive responses within the peripersonal space, thus selectively modulating defensive behavior when the visual feedback is missing.
ISSN:1388-2457
1872-8952
DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.083