Effect of use of cuffed endotracheal tubes on the occurrence of postoperative extubation-related respiratory adverse events in pediatric patients with airway hypersensitivity: a retrospective cohort study

• Published in: Journal of anesthesia
• Main Authors: Sasaki, Kazuma, Takeshita, Jun, Nakamura, Sayaka, Tachibana, Kazuya
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan 29-10-2024
• Subjects: General anesthesia; Children; Intubation; Airway hypersensitivity; Risk factors
• ISSN: 0913-8668; 1438-8359; 1438-8359
• DOI: 10.1007/s00540-024-03423-4

Whether endotracheal tube (ETT) configuration (cuffed or uncuffed) influences the occurrence of respiratory adverse events (RAEs) in patients at risk remains largely unknown. We investigated the effects of cuffed ETTs on RAE occurrence after extubation in pediatric patients with airway hypersensitivity.
Children aged < 8 years with increased airway hypersensitivity (defined as upper airway symptoms, recent upper respiratory infection within 2 weeks, or a history of asthma) who underwent general endotracheal anesthesia with inhaled agents between January 2021 and December 2022 were included. We retrospectively examined the patients' background and intraoperative anesthesia conditions by comparing the cuffed and uncuffed ETT groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between ETT configuration (cuffed vs. uncuffed) and the occurrence of RAEs or respiratory interventions (laryngospasm, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation < 92%, oxygen supplementation, epinephrine inhalation, or reintubation) after extubation.
Cuffed ETTs were used in 163 patients and uncuffed ETTs in 143 patients. Apart from the frequency of upper airway surgery and intraoperative fluid balance, no significant differences in background characteristics were observed between the groups. RAEs after extubation were observed in 36 (22.1%) and 28 (19.6%) patients in each cuffed and uncuffed ETT groups. After adjusting for known RAE risk factors, no difference was observed in RAEs or respiratory interventions after extubation between both groups (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.64, 2.06).
In pediatric patients with airway hypersensitivity, the use of cuffed ETTs did not increase the occurrence of RAEs or respiratory interventions after extubation.