Surgical management of disc pit maculopathy: A case report

• Published in: Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) Vol. 100; no. S275
• Main Authors: Fernández, Miguel Castillo, Rivasés, Guilermo Pérez, El Bakkali, Ismael Bakkali, Moscarda, Eva Josefina Núñez, Rivas, Marta Orejudo, Arias, Pablo Andrés Cisneros, Martínez, Marta Suñer, Clavería, Julia Aramburu, Floria, María Olivia Esteban, Sesé, Isabel Bartolomé, Puyuelo, Javier Ascaso, Lozano, Isabel Pinilla
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-12-2022
• Subjects: Acuity; Case reports; Cataracts; Emergency medical care; Oil; Retina; Retinal detachment; Silicones; Sulfur hexafluoride; Surgery; Visual field
• ISSN: 1755-375X; 1755-3768
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2022.0666

Purpose: Optic disc pit (ODP) is a rare congenital disorder that affects one in 10 000 people. Serous detachment of macula is the most common complication and the natural history of untreated ODP maculopathy is a gradual deterioration with significant visual loss. A multitude of interventions have been designed for the treatment but none has been established as the treatment of choice. Pars plana vitrectomy is one of the most commonly used procedure in recent years. We present a case report with surgical treatment and management of complications.
Methods: An interventional case report of a 63‐year‐old man who attended the emergency room due to sudden visual loss and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 in the right eye (RE). Upon his arrival, a visual field was performed in which complete abolition of the right field was observed, severely affecting the central area. A papillary pit was found in the eye fundus. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed a serous retinal detachment (RD) with macular involvement and surgical management was decided.
Results: A successful pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with peeling of the internal limiting membrane and application of an endolaser was performed. Three months later, he came back with a higher serous RD and a worsening of BCVA. We performed a second PPV with sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) with good anatomical results. One year later, cataract and an inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) was treated with intraocular lens implantation and PPV with silicone oil. Five months later, supero‐temporal retina was detached, so a new PPV was carried out with silicone oil again. One year later, the silicone oil was removed and a retinal detachment was noted 3 months later. Finally, the last surgery was performed practicing encircling band, PPV, application of endolaser and again using silicone oil.
Conclusions: Surgical management of serous retinal detachment caused by papillary pit continues being a challenge for retinal specialists. Complications of surgery are no usually publish in literature and this case report make us take into account. Since it ranges from observation to surgical approach using different techniques and procedures without any showing clear superiority.