Left ventricular remodelling in masters athletes

• Published in: European heart journal cardiovascular imaging Vol. 22; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Papatheodorou, E, Merghani, A, Bakalakos, A, Hughes, R, Torlasco, C, Downs, E, D"silva, A, Finocchiaro, G, Malhotra, A, Tome, M, Moon, JC, Al Fakih, K, Papadakis, M, Sharma, S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 08-02-2021
• ISSN: 2047-2404; 2047-2412
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa356.017

Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): I have received a research fellowship grant from the UK based charity Cardiac Risk in the Young
Objectives
We investigated the effect of long-term exercise and sex on left ventricular (LV) geometry in a large group of female and male masters athletes.
Background
Studies assessing LV geometry in masters athletes are scarce.
Methods
Different types of LV geometry were identified according to echocardiography-derived relative wall thickness (RWT) and left ventricular mass (LVM) values as per international guidelines. 4 groups were formed: normal (normal LVM/normal RWT), concentric hypertrophy (increased LVM/increased RWT), eccentric hypertrophy (increased LVM/normal RWT), and concentric remodeling (normal LVM/increased RWT).
Results
A total of 277 healthy, elite, caucasian endurance masters athletes (65% female; mean age54.8 ± 7.7 years) were assessed. The athletes were exercising for a mean 32 ± 11.7 years and have completed a median 70 competitions including a median 13 marathon-type competitions. Females exhibited lower absolute LVM (127.7 ± 30.31g vs 196.57 ± 45.0g, p < 0.001), indexed LVM (76.8 ± 18.0 g/m2 vs. 103.6 ± 22.7 g/m2; p < 0.001), RWT (0.36 ± 0.07 vs. 0.42 ± 0.08; p < 0.001) and absolute LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (46.3 ± 4.1 mm vs 50.1 ± 5.11 mm, p < 0.001) but greater indexed LVEDD (27.7 ± 2.7mm/m2 vs 26.5 ± 2.7 mm/m2, p < 0.001) compared with male athletes. Most female athletes showed normal LV geometry (72% vs 38% in male athletes, P < 0.001) and significantly less concentric remodeling (12% vs 35%, p < 0.001) and concentric hypertrophy (5% vs 13%, p = 0.01) (table & figure).
Conclusions
A sex-specific response to chronic exercise is observed. Male masters athletes exhibit significantly more frequently abnormal LV geometry with concentric LV remodeling and/or concentric hypertrophy.
Cohort characteristics Male masters athletes N = 97 Female masters athletes N = 180 P value Age (years) 55.0 ± 9.0 54.7 ± 6.9 0.68 Years of exercise 32.0 ± 12.8 33.3 ± 11.1 0.14 LV Mass (g) 127.7 ± 30.31 196.57 ± 45.0 <0.001 LV Mass Indexed (g/m2) 76.8 ± 18.0 103.6 ± 22.7 <0.001 LVEDD (mm) 46.3 ± 4.1 50.1 ± 5.11 <0.001 LVEDD Indexed (mm/m2) 27.7 ± 2.7 26.5 ± 2.7 <0.001 Normal Remodeling 36 (37) 130 (72) <0.001 Eccentric Hypertrophy 14 (14) 18 (10) 0.27 Concentric Remodeling 34 (35) 23 (13) <0.001 Concentric Hypertrophy 13 (13) 9 (5) 0.01 LV Left Ventricular, LVEDD: Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension Abstract Figure. Patterns of left ventricular remodeling