In vivo tau deposition in the brain stem nuclei and circadian rest‐activity rhythm change in non‐demented older adults

• Published in: Alzheimer's & dementia Vol. 19; no. S10
• Main Authors: Jeon, So Yeon, Yi, Dahyun, Byun, Min Soo, Jung, Joon Hyung, Kong, Nayeong, Chang, Yoon Young, Keum, Musung, Jung, Gijung, Ahn, Hyejin, Lee, Jun‐Young, Lee, Yun‐Sang, Kim, Yu Kyeong, Kang, Koung Mi, Sohn, Chul‐Ho, Lee, Dong Young
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01-12-2023
• ISSN: 1552-5260; 1552-5279
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.081600

Background
Circadian rest‐activity rhythm (RAR) alterations are common in the early stage of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) disease. Given that the brainstem nuclei, the locus coeruleus (LC) and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) in particular, play key roles in modulating arousal and the sleep‐wake cycle, tau pathology in the brain stem nuclei, which occurs even before cortical tau progression, may relate to circadian RAR alteration in older individuals. Therefore, we aimed to test the hypothesis that in vivo tau deposition in the LC and DRN correlates with circadian RAR in non‐demented older adults.
Method
A total of 63 non‐demented older adults from the Korean Brain Aging Study for Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease (KBASE) were included. All participants underwent [11C] PiB PET and [18F] AV1451‐PET. Circadian RAR variables were measured using actigraphy for 8 consecutive days. Tau deposition of the LC and DRN (LC‐tau and DRN‐tau, respectively) was measured in the regions of interest (ROI) masks for each participant prepared in native space using the Harvard arousal network atlas for the LC and DRN. For the purpose of comparison, tau deposition in the substantia nigra (SN‐tau) was also measured in the neuromelanin sensitive MRI‐based ROI for the SN.
Result
Increased LC‐tau and DRN‐tau were significantly correlated with delayed acrophase (ß = 0.303, p = 0.024 for LC‐tau and ß = 0.398, p = 0.003 for DRN‐tau; Table 1 & Figure 1). In contrast, SN‐tau did not related with any RAR variables. Even after controlling for global tau deposition, the significance did not changed (ß = 0.321, p = 0.021 for LC‐tau and ß = 0.367, p = 0.008 for DRN‐tau, Table 1). In addition, Aß positivity showed a significant moderation effect on the relationship between LC‐tau with acrophase. Subgroup analyses showed that increased LC‐tau significantly related with delayed acrophase in Aß‐positivegroup (ß = 0.427, p = 0.004), but did not in Aß‐negative group (ß = 0.099, p = 0.615)(Figure 2)
Conclusion
Our findings support the possibility that the tau pathology in the LC and DRN underlie circadian RAR alteration, more specifically delayed phase, in non‐demented older adults. In addition, such relationship appears to be more prominent in individuals with brain Aß pathology.