Management tips for the low incidence, of adverse events and well efficacy of regorafenib for metastatic colorectal cancer in Juntendo University Medical Hospital

• Published in: Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 33; no. 3_suppl; p. 778
• Main Authors: Higashihara, Yoshie, Serizawa, Nobuko, Kato, Junko, Kodani, Tomohiro, Osada, Taro, Nagahara, Akihito, Watanabe, Sumio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 20-01-2015
• ISSN: 0732-183X; 1527-7755
• DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.778

Abstract only 778 Background: Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated significant overall survival for metastatic colorectal cancer in CORRECT study. In the Japanese subset of CORRECT study, adverse events (AEs) such as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), anorexia, and liver dysfunction occurred at high frequency. Therefore, those AEs were one of the causes for treatment discontinuation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy in 14 patients who received regorafenib monotherapy in our hospital between June 2013 and August 2014. Results: Among the 14 patients, median age was 64.5 years old (range 53-76). Median follows up time was 209 days (range 72-340), median PFS was 64 days (range 19-272), and median TTF was 66.5 days (range 18-280). There was no patient who had complete or partial response. The disease control rate was 36%. Nine patients initiated with 160 mg of regorafenib once daily, 4 patients with 120 mg, and one patient with 80 mg. The most common grade 3 or more AEs were HFSR, AST and ALT elevations and hypertension (2 patients, 14.2%, respectively). The frequency of HFSR was lower in our cohort the Japanese patients of CORRECT study. Treatment discontinuation due to drug related AEs occurred to 5 patients (35.7%). Dose reduction and interruption of regorafenib were required in 10 patients (71.4%) and 8 patients (57.1%), respectively. For prevention of HFSR, more than 90% of the patients were received proactive treatment including heparinoid and strong steroid from the start of the therapy. We carefully monitored their toxicities every week during the first cycle, and chose interruption if patients were had more grade 2 AEs. It is very important, we think to give the patients instructions on possible AEs and how to manage them using an illustrated book. Conclusions: Our cohort had lower HFSR in frequency than and similar efficacy to the Japanese subpopulation in CORRECT study. Enough explanation and instruction to patients might be important to decrease an incidence of AEs and treatment discontinuation due to drug- related AEs. We will increase the number of cases and examine in future.