Gene duplication and the origins of morphological complexity in pancrustacean eyes, a genomic approach

• Published in: BMC evolutionary biology Vol. 10; no. 1; p. 123
• Main Authors: Rivera, Ajna S, Pankey, M Sabrina, Plachetzki, David C, Villacorta, Carlos, Syme, Anna E, Serb, Jeanne M, Omilian, Angela R, Oakley, Todd H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 30-04-2010; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Animals; Biology; Colleges & universities; Comparative Genomic Hybridization; Complexity; Crustacea - genetics; Crustaceans; Daphnia - genetics; Daphnia pulex; Datasets; Design; Evolution; Evolution, Molecular; Evolutionary genetics; Eye; Eye - anatomy & histology; Eye - growth & development; Eye Proteins - genetics; Freshwater; Gene Duplication; Gene families; Gene mutations; Genes; Genetic aspects; Genomes; Genomics - methods; Homeodomain Proteins - genetics; Hypotheses; Insects; Metazoa; Modules; Morphology; Multigene Family; Networks; Optical design; Paired Box Transcription Factors - genetics; Pancrustacea; PAX6 Transcription Factor; Photoreceptors; Phototransduction; Phylogenetics; Phylogeny; Physiological aspects; Proteins; Repressor Proteins - genetics; Research article; Retention; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Synteny; Trees; Vertebrates; Vertebrates - genetics; United States
• ISSN: 1471-2148; 1471-2148
• DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-123

Duplication and divergence of genes and genetic networks is hypothesized to be a major driver of the evolution of complexity and novel features. Here, we examine the history of genes and genetic networks in the context of eye evolution by using new approaches to understand patterns of gene duplication during the evolution of metazoan genomes. We hypothesize that 1) genes involved in eye development and phototransduction have duplicated and are retained at higher rates in animal clades that possess more distinct types of optical design; and 2) genes with functional relationships were duplicated and lost together, thereby preserving genetic networks. To test these hypotheses, we examine the rates and patterns of gene duplication and loss evident in 19 metazoan genomes, including that of Daphnia pulex - the first completely sequenced crustacean genome. This is of particular interest because the pancrustaceans (hexapods+crustaceans) have more optical designs than any other major clade of animals, allowing us to test specifically whether the high amount of disparity in pancrustacean eyes is correlated with a higher rate of duplication and retention of vision genes.
Using protein predictions from 19 metazoan whole-genome projects, we found all members of 23 gene families known to be involved in eye development or phototransduction and deduced their phylogenetic relationships. This allowed us to estimate the number and timing of gene duplication and loss events in these gene families during animal evolution. When comparing duplication/retention rates of these genes, we found that the rate was significantly higher in pancrustaceans than in either vertebrates or non-pancrustacean protostomes. Comparing patterns of co-duplication across Metazoa showed that while these eye-genes co-duplicate at a significantly higher rate than those within a randomly shuffled matrix, many genes with known functional relationships in model organisms did not co-duplicate more often than expected by chance.
Overall, and when accounting for factors such as differential rates of whole-genome duplication in different groups, our results are broadly consistent with the hypothesis that genes involved in eye development and phototransduction duplicate at a higher rate in Pancrustacea, the group with the greatest variety of optical designs. The result that these genes have a significantly high number of co-duplications and co-losses could be influenced by shared functions or other unstudied factors such as synteny. Since we did not observe co-duplication/co-loss of genes for all known functional modules (e.g. specific regulatory networks), the interactions among suites of known co-functioning genes (modules) may be plastic at the temporal scale of analysis performed here. Other factors in addition to gene duplication - such as cis-regulation, heterotopy, and co-option - are also likely to be strong factors in the diversification of eye types.