A dosimetric comparison of 3D conformal vs intensity modulated vs volumetric arc radiation therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer

To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder cancer. Radiotherapy plans for 15 patients with T2-T4N0M0 bladder cancer were prospectively developed for 3-DCRT, IMRT and VMAT using Varian...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation oncology (London, England) Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 111
Main Authors: Foroudi, Farshad, Wilson, Lesley, Bressel, Mathias, Haworth, Annette, Hornby, Colin, Pham, Daniel, Cramb, Jim, Gill, Suki, Tai, Keen Hun, Kron, Tomas
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 23-07-2012
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder cancer. Radiotherapy plans for 15 patients with T2-T4N0M0 bladder cancer were prospectively developed for 3-DCRT, IMRT and VMAT using Varian Eclipse planning system. The same radiation therapist carried out all planning and the same clinical dosimetric constraints were used. 10 of the patients with well localised tumours had a simultaneous infield boost (SIB) of the primary tumour planned for both IMRT and VMAT. Tumour control probabilities and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated. Mean planning time for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT was 30.0, 49.3, and 141.0 minutes respectively. The mean PTV conformity (CI) index for 3D-CRT was 1.32, for IMRT 1.05, and for VMAT 1.05. The PTV Homogeneity (HI) index was 0.080 for 3D-CRT, 0.073 for IMRT and 0.086 for VMAT. Tumour control and normal tissue complication probabilities were similar for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT. The mean monitor units were 267 (range 250-293) for 3D-CRT; 824 (range 641-1083) for IMRT; and 403 (range 333-489) for VMAT (P < 0.05). Average treatment delivery time were 2:25min (range 2:01-3:09) for 3D-CRT; 4:39 (range 3:41-6:40) for IMRT; and 1:14 (range 1:13-1:14) for VMAT. In selected patients, the SIB did not result in a higher dose to small bowel or rectum. VMAT is associated with similar dosimetric advantages as IMRT over 3D-CRT for muscle invasive bladder cancer. VMAT is associated with faster delivery times and less number of mean monitor units than IMRT. SIB is feasible in selected patients with localized tumours.
AbstractList To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder cancer. Radiotherapy plans for 15 patients with T2-T4N0M0 bladder cancer were prospectively developed for 3-DCRT, IMRT and VMAT using Varian Eclipse planning system. The same radiation therapist carried out all planning and the same clinical dosimetric constraints were used. 10 of the patients with well localised tumours had a simultaneous infield boost (SIB) of the primary tumour planned for both IMRT and VMAT. Tumour control probabilities and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated. Mean planning time for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT was 30.0, 49.3, and 141.0 minutes respectively. The mean PTV conformity (CI) index for 3D-CRT was 1.32, for IMRT 1.05, and for VMAT 1.05. The PTV Homogeneity (HI) index was 0.080 for 3D-CRT, 0.073 for IMRT and 0.086 for VMAT. Tumour control and normal tissue complication probabilities were similar for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT. The mean monitor units were 267 (range 250-293) for 3D-CRT; 824 (range 641-1083) for IMRT; and 403 (range 333-489) for VMAT (P < 0.05). Average treatment delivery time were 2:25min (range 2:01-3:09) for 3D-CRT; 4:39 (range 3:41-6:40) for IMRT; and 1:14 (range 1:13-1:14) for VMAT. In selected patients, the SIB did not result in a higher dose to small bowel or rectum. VMAT is associated with similar dosimetric advantages as IMRT over 3D-CRT for muscle invasive bladder cancer. VMAT is associated with faster delivery times and less number of mean monitor units than IMRT. SIB is feasible in selected patients with localized tumours.
BACKGROUND: To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder cancer. METHODS: Radiotherapy plans for 15 patients with T2-T4N0M0 bladder cancer were prospectively developed for 3-DCRT, IMRT and VMAT using Varian Eclipse planning system. The same radiation therapist carried out all planning and the same clinical dosimetric constraints were used. 10 of the patients with well localised tumours had a simultaneous infield boost (SIB) of the primary tumour planned for both IMRT and VMAT. Tumour control probabilities and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated. RESULTS: Mean planning time for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT was 30.0, 49.3, and 141.0 minutes respectively. The mean PTV conformity (CI) index for 3D-CRT was 1.32, for IMRT 1.05, and for VMAT 1.05. The PTV Homogeneity (HI) index was 0.080 for 3D-CRT, 0.073 for IMRT and 0.086 for VMAT. Tumour control and normal tissue complication probabilities were similar for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT. The mean monitor units were 267 (range 250-293) for 3D-CRT; 824 (range 641-1083) for IMRT; and 403 (range 333-489) for VMAT (P < 0.05). Average treatment delivery time were 2:25min (range 2:01-3:09) for 3D-CRT; 4:39 (range 3:41-6:40) for IMRT; and 1:14 (range 1:13-1:14) for VMAT. In selected patients, the SIB did not result in a higher dose to small bowel or rectum. CONCLUSIONS: VMAT is associated with similar dosimetric advantages as IMRT over 3D-CRT for muscle invasive bladder cancer. VMAT is associated with faster delivery times and less number of mean monitor units than IMRT. SIB is feasible in selected patients with localized tumours.
To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder cancer. Radiotherapy plans for 15 patients with T2-T4N0M0 bladder cancer were prospectively developed for 3-DCRT, IMRT and VMAT using Varian Eclipse planning system. The same radiation therapist carried out all planning and the same clinical dosimetric constraints were used. 10 of the patients with well localised tumours had a simultaneous infield boost (SIB) of the primary tumour planned for both IMRT and VMAT. Tumour control probabilities and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated. Mean planning time for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT was 30.0, 49.3, and 141.0 minutes respectively. The mean PTV conformity (CI) index for 3D-CRT was 1.32, for IMRT 1.05, and for VMAT 1.05. The PTV Homogeneity (HI) index was 0.080 for 3D-CRT, 0.073 for IMRT and 0.086 for VMAT. Tumour control and normal tissue complication probabilities were similar for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT. The mean monitor units were 267 (range 250-293) for 3D-CRT; 824 (range 641-1083) for IMRT; and 403 (range 333-489) for VMAT (P < 0.05). Average treatment delivery time were 2:25min (range 2:01-3:09) for 3D-CRT; 4:39 (range 3:41-6:40) for IMRT; and 1:14 (range 1:13-1:14) for VMAT. In selected patients, the SIB did not result in a higher dose to small bowel or rectum. VMAT is associated with similar dosimetric advantages as IMRT over 3D-CRT for muscle invasive bladder cancer. VMAT is associated with faster delivery times and less number of mean monitor units than IMRT. SIB is feasible in selected patients with localized tumours.
Doc number: 111 Abstract Background: To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder cancer. Methods: Radiotherapy plans for 15 patients with T2-T4N0M0 bladder cancer were prospectively developed for 3-DCRT, IMRT and VMAT using Varian Eclipse planning system. The same radiation therapist carried out all planning and the same clinical dosimetric constraints were used. 10 of the patients with well localised tumours had a simultaneous infield boost (SIB) of the primary tumour planned for both IMRT and VMAT. Tumour control probabilities and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated. Results: Mean planning time for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT was 30.0, 49.3, and 141.0 minutes respectively. The mean PTV conformity (CI) index for 3D-CRT was 1.32, for IMRT 1.05, and for VMAT 1.05. The PTV Homogeneity (HI) index was 0.080 for 3D-CRT, 0.073 for IMRT and 0.086 for VMAT. Tumour control and normal tissue complication probabilities were similar for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT. The mean monitor units were 267 (range 250-293) for 3D-CRT; 824 (range 641-1083) for IMRT; and 403 (range 333-489) for VMAT (P < 0.05). Average treatment delivery time were 2:25min (range 2:01-3:09) for 3D-CRT; 4:39 (range 3:41-6:40) for IMRT; and 1:14 (range 1:13-1:14) for VMAT. In selected patients, the SIB did not result in a higher dose to small bowel or rectum. Conclusions: VMAT is associated with similar dosimetric advantages as IMRT over 3D-CRT for muscle invasive bladder cancer. VMAT is associated with faster delivery times and less number of mean monitor units than IMRT. SIB is feasible in selected patients with localized tumours.
Abstract Background To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder cancer. Methods Radiotherapy plans for 15 patients with T2-T4N0M0 bladder cancer were prospectively developed for 3-DCRT, IMRT and VMAT using Varian Eclipse planning system. The same radiation therapist carried out all planning and the same clinical dosimetric constraints were used. 10 of the patients with well localised tumours had a simultaneous infield boost (SIB) of the primary tumour planned for both IMRT and VMAT. Tumour control probabilities and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated. Results Mean planning time for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT was 30.0, 49.3, and 141.0 minutes respectively. The mean PTV conformity (CI) index for 3D-CRT was 1.32, for IMRT 1.05, and for VMAT 1.05. The PTV Homogeneity (HI) index was 0.080 for 3D-CRT, 0.073 for IMRT and 0.086 for VMAT. Tumour control and normal tissue complication probabilities were similar for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT. The mean monitor units were 267 (range 250–293) for 3D-CRT; 824 (range 641–1083) for IMRT; and 403 (range 333–489) for VMAT (P < 0.05). Average treatment delivery time were 2:25min (range 2:01–3:09) for 3D-CRT; 4:39 (range 3:41–6:40) for IMRT; and 1:14 (range 1:13–1:14) for VMAT. In selected patients, the SIB did not result in a higher dose to small bowel or rectum. Conclusions VMAT is associated with similar dosimetric advantages as IMRT over 3D-CRT for muscle invasive bladder cancer. VMAT is associated with faster delivery times and less number of mean monitor units than IMRT. SIB is feasible in selected patients with localized tumours.
Background To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder cancer. Methods Radiotherapy plans for 15 patients with T2-T4N0M0 bladder cancer were prospectively developed for 3-DCRT, IMRT and VMAT using Varian Eclipse planning system. The same radiation therapist carried out all planning and the same clinical dosimetric constraints were used. 10 of the patients with well localised tumours had a simultaneous infield boost (SIB) of the primary tumour planned for both IMRT and VMAT. Tumour control probabilities and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated. Results Mean planning time for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT was 30.0, 49.3, and 141.0 minutes respectively. The mean PTV conformity (CI) index for 3D-CRT was 1.32, for IMRT 1.05, and for VMAT 1.05. The PTV Homogeneity (HI) index was 0.080 for 3D-CRT, 0.073 for IMRT and 0.086 for VMAT. Tumour control and normal tissue complication probabilities were similar for 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT. The mean monitor units were 267 (range 250-293) for 3D-CRT; 824 (range 641-1083) for IMRT; and 403 (range 333-489) for VMAT (P < 0.05). Average treatment delivery time were 2:25min (range 2:01-3:09) for 3D-CRT; 4:39 (range 3:41-6:40) for IMRT; and 1:14 (range 1:13-1:14) for VMAT. In selected patients, the SIB did not result in a higher dose to small bowel or rectum. Conclusions VMAT is associated with similar dosimetric advantages as IMRT over 3D-CRT for muscle invasive bladder cancer. VMAT is associated with faster delivery times and less number of mean monitor units than IMRT. SIB is feasible in selected patients with localized tumours. Keywords: Bladder cancer, Intensity modulated radiation therapy, Volumetric modulated arc therapy
ArticleNumber 111
Audience Academic
Author Bressel, Mathias
Cramb, Jim
Pham, Daniel
Foroudi, Farshad
Wilson, Lesley
Gill, Suki
Tai, Keen Hun
Kron, Tomas
Haworth, Annette
Hornby, Colin
AuthorAffiliation 3 Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
1 Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
2 Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
4 Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
– name: 2 Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
– name: 3 Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
– name: 4 Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Farshad
  surname: Foroudi
  fullname: Foroudi, Farshad
  email: farshad.foroudi@petermac.org
  organization: Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia. farshad.foroudi@petermac.org
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Lesley
  surname: Wilson
  fullname: Wilson, Lesley
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mathias
  surname: Bressel
  fullname: Bressel, Mathias
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Annette
  surname: Haworth
  fullname: Haworth, Annette
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Colin
  surname: Hornby
  fullname: Hornby, Colin
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Daniel
  surname: Pham
  fullname: Pham, Daniel
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Jim
  surname: Cramb
  fullname: Cramb, Jim
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Suki
  surname: Gill
  fullname: Gill, Suki
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Keen Hun
  surname: Tai
  fullname: Tai, Keen Hun
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Tomas
  surname: Kron
  fullname: Kron, Tomas
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22824133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kk1r3DAQhk1JaT7ac29F0LMTy5Jl-VLYpl-BQC8t9CZG0mijxba2kr10f0D_d7XdTZqFFB0kXs08zMw758XJGEYsite0uqRUiivaclm2tP1VtiWl9Flxdq_8OHn0Pi3OU1pVFW9Y1b0oTuta1pwydlb8XhAbkh9wit4QE4Y1RJ_CSIIj7EMWRhfiAD3ZJOLHCcfkpy0Zgp17mNDu5E3o50M-REMiWA-Tz4jpDiOstyQTyDAn02NGbCD5DRLdg7UYiYHRYHxZPHfQJ3x1uC-K758-frv-Ut5-_XxzvbgttWi7qdS1kLKRjKFAzluAxjjhwDSIVDirbe5Q1Fya1tEOAUxnoQaK0HTaCd2xi-Jmz7UBVmod_QBxqwJ49VcIcakgTj5XqipgrZXa2JpCHpWWFhohHKcopdY1ZNa7PWs96wGtwXGK0B9Bj39Gf6eWYaMY55wJlgHv9wDtw38Axz_ZHbWzVO0sVa3KhmfI20MVMfycMU1qFeY45iEqWsmqbfJAun9RS8it-expBprBJ6MWDeOMdrzesS6fiMrH4uDzJqDzWT9KuNonmBhSiugeiqeV2u3nE-W-eTy0h_j7hWR_ACJb5kU
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrras_2014_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00066_015_0859_6
crossref_primary_10_4103_jmp_jmp_156_23
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_016_0618_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canrad_2013_06_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meddos_2015_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clineuro_2019_105573
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_015_0499_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2022_05_003
crossref_primary_10_4103_jrcr_jrcr_19_22
crossref_primary_10_1186_1748_717X_9_109
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2015_12_379
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00411_013_0497_2
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_637591
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2012_11_035
crossref_primary_10_1177_0300891618766114
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1460396921000431
crossref_primary_10_1177_0300891618766111
crossref_primary_10_4103_jmp_jmp_11_24
crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_13587
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canrad_2014_08_006
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_023_02348_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2014_03_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2017_01_239
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2021_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meddos_2016_09_003
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20200125
crossref_primary_10_36290_xon_2019_039
crossref_primary_10_3390_gels8090582
crossref_primary_10_3233_BLC_170137
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2019_09_056
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.037
10.1016/j.radonc.2006.06.015
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.044
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.040
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.024
10.1186/1748-717X-5-95
10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.015
10.3171/jns.2000.93.supplement_3.0219
10.1007/BF03178629
10.1118/1.2818738
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01031-9
10.1016/j.clon.2011.06.006
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.046
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.071
10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5776
10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.011
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.025
10.1016/j.clon.2009.01.016
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.078
10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02336.x
10.1186/1748-717X-6-75
10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.011
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.037
10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00281-4
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.047
10.1016/j.ejmp.2007.07.001
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.013
10.3109/0284186X.2010.498431
10.1186/1748-717X-5-110
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.061
10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.013
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.027
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00073-7
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd.
2012 Foroudi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright ©2012 Foroudi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Foroudi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2012 Foroudi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
– notice: Copyright ©2012 Foroudi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 Foroudi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7QO
7X7
7XB
88E
8FD
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
P64
PIMPY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-7-111
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Technology Research Database
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE
Publicly Available Content Database


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: http://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1748-717X
EndPage 111
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_0a37d8bcd21a413b8da566f41e88bb2a
oai_biomedcentral_com_1748_717X_7_111
2772077231
A534319421
10_1186_1748_717X_7_111
22824133
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations Australia
United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Australia
– name: United States
GroupedDBID ---
-A0
0R~
123
29P
2VQ
2WC
3V.
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACRMQ
ADBBV
ADINQ
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C24
C6C
CCPQU
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HMCUK
HYE
I-F
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPNFZ
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
NPM
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RIG
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
AAYXX
CITATION
7QO
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
FR3
K9.
P64
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
ABVAZ
AFGXO
AFNRJ
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b679t-b26885833e6e447aa5cf6fac5ee16fdbd0046248c7f19eaac9da2a1ea59bf6b93
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 1748-717X
IngestDate Tue Oct 22 15:11:43 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 17 21:19:05 EDT 2024
Wed May 22 07:15:23 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:15:25 EDT 2024
Tue Nov 19 21:30:56 EST 2024
Tue Nov 12 23:35:15 EST 2024
Thu Sep 12 17:03:37 EDT 2024
Sat Nov 02 12:14:36 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b679t-b26885833e6e447aa5cf6fac5ee16fdbd0046248c7f19eaac9da2a1ea59bf6b93
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444363/
PMID 22824133
PQID 1080754629
PQPubID 55355
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0a37d8bcd21a413b8da566f41e88bb2a
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3444363
biomedcentral_primary_oai_biomedcentral_com_1748_717X_7_111
proquest_journals_1080754629
gale_infotracmisc_A534319421
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A534319421
crossref_primary_10_1186_1748_717X_7_111
pubmed_primary_22824133
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-07-23
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-07-23
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-07-23
  day: 23
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Radiation oncology (London, England)
PublicationTitleAlternate Radiat Oncol
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References EJ Hall (618_CR6) 2003; 56
B Dobler (618_CR32) 2010; 5
JD Ruben (618_CR37) 2008; 70
K Otto (618_CR13) 2008; 35
T Holmes (618_CR18) 2009; 74
S Cilla (618_CR3) 2011
B Brenner (618_CR36) 2003; 10
(ICRU) ICoRUaM (618_CR19) 2010
CL Tsai (618_CR11) 2010
CA McBain (618_CR29) 2009; 21
D Palma (618_CR14) 2008; 72
N Burridge (618_CR28) 2006; 66
L Cozzi (618_CR8) 2008; 89
GJ Budgell (618_CR33) 2001; 59
P Deb (618_CR26) 2009; 32
M Guckenberger (618_CR7) 2009; 93
P Ost (618_CR35) 2011; 79
JA Efstathiou (618_CR1) 2009; 27
S Manager (618_CR30) 2007; 85
J Alvarez-Moret (618_CR9) 2010; 5
C McBain (618_CR5) 2009; 75
I Paddick (618_CR21) 2000; 93 Suppl 3
F Foroudi (618_CR16) 2010; 81
BD Kavanagh (618_CR24) 2010; 76
LP Muren (618_CR34) 2006; 80
EJ Hall (618_CR38) 2006; 65
CH Hsieh (618_CR2) 2011; 6
BR Hindson (618_CR17) 2012; 56
CC Pan (618_CR25) 2003; 57
A Bertelsen (618_CR31) 2010; 95
TF Lee (618_CR4) 2011; 24
A Henry (618_CR27) 2006; 64
D Wolff (618_CR12) 2009; 93
MT Davidson (618_CR10) 2011; 80
N Hardcastle (618_CR15) 2010; 36
HA Gay (618_CR22) 2007; 23
P Wright (618_CR20) 2010; 49
JM Michalski (618_CR23) 2010; 76
References_xml – volume: 85
  start-page: 207
  year: 2007
  ident: 618_CR30
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.037
  contributor:
    fullname: S Manager
– volume: 80
  start-page: 98
  year: 2006
  ident: 618_CR34
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.06.015
  contributor:
    fullname: LP Muren
– volume-title: ICRU Report 83, Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Intensity-Modulated Photon-Beam Therapy (IMRT)
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR19
  contributor:
    fullname: (ICRU) ICoRUaM
– volume-title: Med Dosim
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR11
  contributor:
    fullname: CL Tsai
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1174
  year: 2006
  ident: 618_CR27
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.044
  contributor:
    fullname: A Henry
– volume: 75
  start-page: 664
  year: 2009
  ident: 618_CR5
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.040
  contributor:
    fullname: C McBain
– volume: 80
  start-page: 1550
  year: 2011
  ident: 618_CR10
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.024
  contributor:
    fullname: MT Davidson
– volume: 5
  start-page: 95
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR32
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-95
  contributor:
    fullname: B Dobler
– volume: 93
  start-page: 259
  year: 2009
  ident: 618_CR7
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.015
  contributor:
    fullname: M Guckenberger
– volume: 93 Suppl 3
  start-page: 219
  year: 2000
  ident: 618_CR21
  publication-title: J Neurosurg
  doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.supplement_3.0219
  contributor:
    fullname: I Paddick
– volume: 32
  start-page: 51
  year: 2009
  ident: 618_CR26
  publication-title: Australas Phys Eng Sci Med
  doi: 10.1007/BF03178629
  contributor:
    fullname: P Deb
– volume-title: et al
  year: 2011
  ident: 618_CR3
  contributor:
    fullname: S Cilla
– volume: 35
  start-page: 310
  year: 2008
  ident: 618_CR13
  publication-title: Med Phys
  doi: 10.1118/1.2818738
  contributor:
    fullname: K Otto
– volume: 57
  start-page: S217
  year: 2003
  ident: 618_CR25
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01031-9
  contributor:
    fullname: CC Pan
– volume: 24
  start-page: 196
  year: 2011
  ident: 618_CR4
  publication-title: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
  doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.06.006
  contributor:
    fullname: TF Lee
– volume: 36
  start-page: 264
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR15
  publication-title: Med Dosim
  contributor:
    fullname: N Hardcastle
– volume: 70
  start-page: 1530
  year: 2008
  ident: 618_CR37
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.046
  contributor:
    fullname: JD Ruben
– volume: 76
  start-page: S101
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR24
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.071
  contributor:
    fullname: BD Kavanagh
– volume: 27
  start-page: 4055
  year: 2009
  ident: 618_CR1
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5776
  contributor:
    fullname: JA Efstathiou
– volume: 93
  start-page: 226
  year: 2009
  ident: 618_CR12
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.011
  contributor:
    fullname: D Wolff
– volume: 79
  start-page: 920
  year: 2011
  ident: 618_CR35
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.025
  contributor:
    fullname: P Ost
– volume: 21
  start-page: 385
  year: 2009
  ident: 618_CR29
  publication-title: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
  doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.01.016
  contributor:
    fullname: CA McBain
– volume: 76
  start-page: S123
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR23
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.078
  contributor:
    fullname: JM Michalski
– volume: 56
  start-page: 18
  year: 2012
  ident: 618_CR17
  publication-title: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02336.x
  contributor:
    fullname: BR Hindson
– volume: 6
  start-page: 75
  year: 2011
  ident: 618_CR2
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-75
  contributor:
    fullname: CH Hsieh
– volume: 95
  start-page: 142
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR31
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.011
  contributor:
    fullname: A Bertelsen
– volume: 74
  start-page: 1311
  year: 2009
  ident: 618_CR18
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.037
  contributor:
    fullname: T Holmes
– volume: 59
  start-page: 31
  year: 2001
  ident: 618_CR33
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00281-4
  contributor:
    fullname: GJ Budgell
– volume: 72
  start-page: 996
  year: 2008
  ident: 618_CR14
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.047
  contributor:
    fullname: D Palma
– volume: 10
  start-page: 2051
  year: 2003
  ident: 618_CR36
  publication-title: Oncol Rep
  contributor:
    fullname: B Brenner
– volume: 23
  start-page: 115
  year: 2007
  ident: 618_CR22
  publication-title: Phys Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2007.07.001
  contributor:
    fullname: HA Gay
– volume: 66
  start-page: 892
  year: 2006
  ident: 618_CR28
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.013
  contributor:
    fullname: N Burridge
– volume: 49
  start-page: 1045
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR20
  publication-title: Acta Oncol
  doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.498431
  contributor:
    fullname: P Wright
– volume: 5
  start-page: 110
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR9
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-110
  contributor:
    fullname: J Alvarez-Moret
– volume: 81
  start-page: 765
  year: 2010
  ident: 618_CR16
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.061
  contributor:
    fullname: F Foroudi
– volume: 89
  start-page: 180
  year: 2008
  ident: 618_CR8
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.013
  contributor:
    fullname: L Cozzi
– volume: 65
  start-page: 1
  year: 2006
  ident: 618_CR38
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.027
  contributor:
    fullname: EJ Hall
– volume: 56
  start-page: 83
  year: 2003
  ident: 618_CR6
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00073-7
  contributor:
    fullname: EJ Hall
SSID ssj0045309
Score 2.1605816
Snippet To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder...
Background To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)...
Doc number: 111 Abstract Background: To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with...
BACKGROUND: To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)...
Abstract Background To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
biomedcentral
proquest
gale
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 111
SubjectTerms Bladder
Bladder cancer
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Comparative analysis
Health aspects
Health physics
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Intensity modulated radiation therapy
Medical equipment and supplies industry
Medical test kit industry
Muscle, Skeletal - pathology
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Radiation
Radiation dosimetry
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Retrospective Studies
Therapists
Therapy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Volumetric modulated arc therapy
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: BiomedCentral
  dbid: RBZ
  link: http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07bxQxELYgSIgmvOEgIBdIQLHivPbaXlFdSKI0UPCQIhrLT3HSPdDtXaT8gPxvZrx7p5ikQTRb-LX2zHg8I898JuQN4n8kznylQkAHJcTK2tZXgYtkx4HX2mO-8-k39eVMHx0jTM77m2_wmZYfwGTWFTgdZ5WqGGbx3gGPQaAwfz38uVW6ouE5mmPXeEDxuWGAvzLbZ8WBlHH7r2vnK8dTGTp55Sw6uf8Pq3hA9geDk056CXlIbsXFI3L383Cl_phcTmhYdtM5vqzlqd89S0iXifIjKOjzlWb0vKPTPt59fUHny4DvfsWAxb2Gy_1h29AVwh0gv2mf3HVBYQQ633Twfxji3GLEPHUz1Hkr6lHsVk_Ij5Pj759Oq-FthspJ1a4rV0utMWMryiiEsrbxSSbrmxiZTMGFnPUqtFeJtdFa3wZbWxZt07okXcufkr3FchGfE6psM061TSw54Cx8mxiCahgXUkc95iPysWCY-d3jcBhExi5rgEgGKW2Q0kahezMi77bs3XXMjo-W15seIvuL8XMBMNIMG9mMLVdBOx9qZsEAcDpYsIiTYFFr52o7Im9ReAzqB5iTt0OaA6wVkbbMpOFgs7Wiht8dFC1hX_uyeit-ZtArXYZzVQ1Qth2RZ70k7qZbg_cMMwJ6qUJGi_WUNYvpr4wozoUQXPIX_0Xpl-QeWJM5lrnmB2RvvdrEV-R2Fzav8179A89qPaU
  priority: 500
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagB8QF8WZpQT4gwSVqHDu2I04LbdULXACpt8hPsdI-0Ga3Un8A_7szdjaq1QMXLjnYjmPPjMczysw3hHxA_I_ImauU9-ig-FAZ07nKcxFN7XmjHeY7X_5Q36_02TnC5EylvjAmLMMDZ8Kd1oYrr63zDTOgcK32BiyQKFjQ2tomm0a1PDhTWQeLlqfgDjC3dQUOy9UI6sO0PJ3aKlUxLBxUJLovi_spwfjfV9Z3bqsykvLO1XTxlDwZbUo6z3t5Rh6E9XPy6Nv41_wF-TunfjMsVlg8y1E3VR6km0j5GTTklKQlvR7oIoe0727oauOxtFfw2JyVWHofTgbdIqIBspTm_K0bCjPQ1X6A78MU1waD4qldolrbUoeStX1Jfl2c__x6WY3lFyorVberbCO1xqSsIIMQypjWRRmNa0NgMnrrU2Kr0E5F1gVjXOdNY1gwbWejtB1_RY7Wm3V4Q6gybR0bE1m04O7Bsw3eq5ZxIXXQNZ-RzwUT-j8ZaqNH8OuyB4jUIwt7ZGGv0IOZkU8Hlk0vJt9Gy_tDvyBLi_lTA4hcP4pc_y-Rm5GPKBA9qgBYkzNjJgPsFcG0-nnLwSzrRAOfOylGwtF1ZfdBpPpRdQwJsVW1QNluRl5n6ZqW24CDDCsCeqlC7or9lD3rxe8EGs6FEFzyt_-DAMfkMdiNKWq54SfkaLfdh3fk4eD379MxvAWoTjqf
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title A dosimetric comparison of 3D conformal vs intensity modulated vs volumetric arc radiation therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22824133
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1080754629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-111
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3444363
https://doaj.org/article/0a37d8bcd21a413b8da566f41e88bb2a
Volume 7
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELbYHhAXxJtAqXxAgku6m9iJHXHavtRLEeIhVVwiP2GlTVIlu5X6A_q_O-Mkq4beuOTgdzwPzyQznwn5iPgfniUmFtaig2JdrFRhYsu4VwvLUmkw3_n8h_h6KU9OESYnG3NhQtC-0avDel0d1qu_IbbyqjLzMU5s_u3imHHOWc7mMzID23B00Xv1yzO2KAYMn0Tmc7C4ZQw-y2UsYpBrBP8FLwNUN_snxX09OZkCgP9DNX3vnJrGUN47lM6ekaeDNUmX_aqfk0eufkEeXwz_y1-S2yW1Tbeq8NosQ83uzkHaeMpOoKBPRlrT646u-mD2zQ2tGouXejmLxb36Cv1BJmiLWAZITNpnbt1QGIFW2w7mhyGuFYbDU71GhdZSgzzVviK_zk5_Hp_Hw8ULsc5FsYl1mkuJ6Vgud5wLpTLjc69M5lySe6ttSGnl0gifFE4pU1iVqsSprNA-1wV7TfbqpnZvCRUqW_hU-cRrcPTgmTlrRZYwnksnFywiXyZEKK96kI0SYa-nNbBJJVKzRGqWAn2XiHweSbbrGLwamT9seoQknYwfCpr2TzkwV7lQTFipjU0TBSyipVVg7nqeOCm1TlVEPiFDlCj8sCajhhwGeFeE0SqXGQODrOApTLc_aQlCa6bVI0uVg9LoAlaryGBni4i86blrt9yRaSMiJnw3eZ9pDUhPgAsfpOXdf_d8T56AmRiClFO2T_Y27dZ9ILPObg_CJwx4fj_6fRDE8A4bYjpN
link.rule.ids 108,230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2106,24946,27933,27934,53800,53802,75821,75822
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZokYAL78JCAR-Q4JJuEjuxI05LH1pEt0KiSL1ZfsJKu9lqH5X6A_jfzDjJqqG3XnKwYzu2vxnPKDOfCfmI_B-BZTYRzqGD4nyidWUTx3jQqWO5tJjvPP4pzi7k0THS5BRdLkwM2rdmelDP5gf19E-Mrbyc22EXJzb8MTlknHNWsuEOuQ_ymqadk94oYF6wtGpZfDJZDsHmlgl4LReJSECykf4X_AxQ3uy_JPdZ72yKFP63FfWNk6ofRXnjWDp5cscJPSWPWzuUjprqZ-Ser5-TB5P2T_sL8ndE3WI1neOFW5ba7W2FdBEoO4KCJo1pRq9WdNqEwa-v6Xzh8Dow77C4UXyxPUgTXSILAsKANjlf1xR6oPPNCsaHLq40BtJTM0NVuKQW0bh8SX6dHJ8fjpP2yobElKJaJyYvpcRELl96zoXWhQ1l0LbwPiuDMy4mw3JpRcgqr7WtnM515nVRmVCaiu2R3XpR-9eECl2kIdchCwZcRHgW3jlRZIyX0suUDciX3uapy4aeQyFhdr8GFkkhChSiQAn0egbkc7fV24bRH5Ll7Ve_IhR6_ceCxfK3andRpZoJJ411eaYBWkY6DYZy4JmX0phcD8gnBJJCtQHfZHWb_QBzRQIuNSoYmHIVz2G4_d6bIO62X91BUbXqZhVZXkUBK1sNyKsGldvP7cA-IKKH1958-jUA00g03sLyzZ1bfiAPx-eTU3X67ez7W_IIjM0Y6pyzfbK7Xm78O7Kzcpv3UXz_AeapTcw
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9NAEF7RIlVceD8MBfaABBc3tnftXYtTaBoVQatKgNTbap8QKXGiPCr1B_C_mVk7UU1vcMlhX_Z6v5mdUWa-IeQd8n8ElttUOIcOivOp1rVNHeNBZ44V0mK-8-k3cX4pRydIk7Mr9RWD9q2ZHDXT2VEz-RVjKxczO9jGiQ0uzo4Z55xVbLBwYbBH7oLMZsXWUW-VMC9ZVndMPrmsBmB3yxQ8l8tUpCDdSAEMvgYocPZXovu0dz9FGv_byvrGbdWPpLxxNY0f_MemHpL7nT1Kh-2QR-SObx6Tg7PuH_cn5PeQuvlqMsPCW5baXdVCOg-UjaChTWea0qsVnbTh8OtrOps7LAvmHTa3CjDOB6miS2RDQDjQNvfrmsIKdLZZwfNhiSuNAfXUTFElLqlFVC6fkh_jk-_Hp2lXuiE1lajXqSkqKTGhy1eec6F1aUMVtC29z6vgjItJsVxaEfLaa21rpwude13WJlSmZs_IfjNv_AtChS6zUOiQBwOuIvyW3jlR5oxX0suMJeRj7wDVoqXpUEic3e-Bj6QQCQqRoAR6Pwn5sD3u3cToF8nq9tBPCIfe-rFhvvypupNUmWbCSWNdkWuAl5FOg8EceO6lNKbQCXmPYFKoPuCdrO6yIGCvSMSlhiUDk67mBTzusDcSxN72u7dwVJ3aWUW2V1HCl60T8rxF5u51t4BPiOhhtreffg9ANRKOd9B8-c8z35KDi9FYff18_uUVuQc2Z4x4Ltgh2V8vN_412Vu5zZsowX8AJYJQTA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+dosimetric+comparison+of+3D+conformal+vs+intensity+modulated+vs+volumetric+arc+radiation+therapy+for+muscle+invasive+bladder+cancer&rft.jtitle=Radiation+oncology+%28London%2C+England%29&rft.au=oudi%2C+Farshad&rft.au=Wilson%2C+Lesley&rft.au=Bressel%2C+Mathias&rft.au=Haworth%2C+Annette&rft.date=2012-07-23&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft.volume=7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1748-717X-7-111&rft.externalDocID=2772077231
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon