Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography

Aim: To compare anterior chamber depth measurements by three non-contact devices—the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser (SPAC), and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) Methods: Prospective, cross sectional study of 497 phakic subjects over 50 ye...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of ophthalmology Vol. 91; no. 8; pp. 1023 - 1026
Main Authors: Lavanya, Raghavan, Teo, Livia, Friedman, David S, Aung, Han T, Baskaran, Mani, Gao, Hong, Alfred, Tamuno, Seah, Steve K, Kashiwagi, Kenji, Foster, Paul J, Aung, Tin
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01-08-2007
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim: To compare anterior chamber depth measurements by three non-contact devices—the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser (SPAC), and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) Methods: Prospective, cross sectional study of 497 phakic subjects over 50 years of age attending a community clinic in Singapore. Anterior chamber depth of the right eye was measured using all three techniques by the same investigator. Depth measurements were made from the corneal epithelium to the anterior lens surface. The values obtained were compared using Bland–Altman analysis. Results: 232 men and 265 women were examined (mean (SD) age, 63.4 (7.9) years). Mean anterior chamber depth was 3.08 (0.36) mm with IOLMaster, 3.10 (0.44) mm with SPAC, and 3.14 (0.34) mm with AS-OCT. A significant difference was present between the anterior chamber depth measurements recorded by the three devices (p<0.0001). Mean differences between the measurements were: AS-OCT v IOLMaster, 0.062 (0.007) mm (95% limits of agreement, −0.37 to 0.25 mm) (p<0.0001); AS-OCT v SPAC, 0.035 (0.011) mm (−0.44 to 0.51 mm) (p = 0.0001); SPAC v IOLMaster, 0.027 (0.012) mm (−0.57 to 0.50 mm) (p = 0.027). Conclusions: AS-OCT gave systematically deeper anterior chamber measurements than SPAC and IOL-Master. However, as the differences found were small they are unlikely to be clinically important.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-718MLCWJ-N
istex:9F5DF5D9BA18060C8AF4C20F781D80F694E6A48F
href:bjophthalmol-91-1023.pdf
PMID:17327264
Correspondence to: Associate Professor Tin Aung Glaucoma Department, Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751; tin11@pacific.net.sg
local:0911023
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.2006.113761