Dog-bite lacerations: a controlled trial of primary wound closure
Dog-bite wounds are often left open because of their reputation for infection if primarily closed. A prospective randomized trial comparing primary closure with leaving the wound open was performed to assess infection and cosmesis. Ninety-six patients with 169 lacerations had thorough surgical debri...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of emergency medicine Vol. 5; no. 3; pp. 156 - 161 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine
01-09-1988
Blackwell BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Dog-bite wounds are often left open because of their reputation for infection if primarily closed. A prospective randomized trial comparing primary closure with leaving the wound open was performed to assess infection and cosmesis. Ninety-six patients with 169 lacerations had thorough surgical debridement and irrigation of their wounds. Ninety-two wounds were sutured and 77 left open. No prophylactic antibiotics were given. A total of 13 wounds developed infection: seven sutured and six unsutured wounds (not statistically significant), giving an overall infection rate of 7.7%. Significantly (P less than 0.01), more wound infections occurred in the hand in both groups compared to the rest of the body, indicating that particular attention should be paid to management of such wounds. It was concluded that dog-bite wounds should receive thorough surgical treatment and can be safely sutured at presentation. Special care should be given to hand wounds. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:46FBF25AB60B7DD675C4BC61A13E2D1A6F23B4DE ark:/67375/NVC-WN0ZGN97-Q PMID:3178974 href:emermed-5-156.pdf local:emermed;5/3/156 |
ISSN: | 0264-4924 |
DOI: | 10.1136/emj.5.3.156 |