Dog-bite lacerations: a controlled trial of primary wound closure

Dog-bite wounds are often left open because of their reputation for infection if primarily closed. A prospective randomized trial comparing primary closure with leaving the wound open was performed to assess infection and cosmesis. Ninety-six patients with 169 lacerations had thorough surgical debri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of emergency medicine Vol. 5; no. 3; pp. 156 - 161
Main Authors: Maimaris, C, Quinton, D N
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine 01-09-1988
Blackwell
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dog-bite wounds are often left open because of their reputation for infection if primarily closed. A prospective randomized trial comparing primary closure with leaving the wound open was performed to assess infection and cosmesis. Ninety-six patients with 169 lacerations had thorough surgical debridement and irrigation of their wounds. Ninety-two wounds were sutured and 77 left open. No prophylactic antibiotics were given. A total of 13 wounds developed infection: seven sutured and six unsutured wounds (not statistically significant), giving an overall infection rate of 7.7%. Significantly (P less than 0.01), more wound infections occurred in the hand in both groups compared to the rest of the body, indicating that particular attention should be paid to management of such wounds. It was concluded that dog-bite wounds should receive thorough surgical treatment and can be safely sutured at presentation. Special care should be given to hand wounds.
Bibliography:istex:46FBF25AB60B7DD675C4BC61A13E2D1A6F23B4DE
ark:/67375/NVC-WN0ZGN97-Q
PMID:3178974
href:emermed-5-156.pdf
local:emermed;5/3/156
ISSN:0264-4924
DOI:10.1136/emj.5.3.156