Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review

• Published in: BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies Vol. 4; no. 1; p. e000104
• Main Authors: McLean, Kenneth A, Knight, Stephen R, Diehl, Thomas M, Zafar, Syed Nabeel, Bouamrane, Matt, Harrison, Ewen M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 04-03-2022; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Subjects: Clinical medicine; Collaboration; COVID-19; health care quality, access, and evaluation; health services research; Intervention; outcomes research; Pandemics; Patients; Physiology; Protocol; Recovery (Medical); remote sensing technology; Surgery; Systematic review; Telemedicine; wireless technology; health services research; health care quality, access, and evaluation; outcomes research; wireless technology; remote sensing technology
• ISSN: 2631-4940; 2631-4940
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000104

IntroductionThe postoperative period represents a time where patients are at a high-risk of morbidity, which warrants effective surveillance. While digital health interventions (DHIs) for postoperative monitoring are promising, a coordinated, standardized and evidence-based approach regarding their implementation and evaluation is currently lacking. This study aimed to identify DHIs implemented and evaluated in postoperative care to highlight research gaps and assess the readiness for routine implementation.MethodsA systematic review will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies describing the implementation and evaluation of DHIs for postoperative monitoring published since 2000 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021264289). This will encompass the Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, and manual search of bibliographies for relevant studies and gray literature. Methodological reporting quality will be evaluated using the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term Follow-up (IDEAL) reporting guideline relevant to the IDEAL stage of the study, and risk of bias will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Data will be extracted according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating DHIs, and a narrative synthesis will be performed.DiscussionThis review will assess the readiness for implementation of DHIs for routine postoperative monitoring and will include studies describing best practice from service changes already being piloted out of necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic. This will identify interventions with sufficient evidence to progress to the next IDEAL stage, and promote standardized and comprehensive evaluation of future implementational studies.