The Finger iridectomy technique: small incision biopsy of anterior segment tumours

Aims: To develop a minimally invasive, maximally effective method to biopsy anterior segment tumours. Methods: A 25 gauge aspiration cutter (vitrector) was used to biopsy anterior segment tumours. The probe was introduced under sodium hyaluronate 1% and through a 1 mm incision. Aspiration (600 mm Hg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of ophthalmology Vol. 89; no. 8; pp. 946 - 949
Main Authors: Finger, P T, Latkany, P, Kurli, M, Iacob, C
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01-08-2005
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Copyright 2005 British Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims: To develop a minimally invasive, maximally effective method to biopsy anterior segment tumours. Methods: A 25 gauge aspiration cutter (vitrector) was used to biopsy anterior segment tumours. The probe was introduced under sodium hyaluronate 1% and through a 1 mm incision. Aspiration (600 mm Hg) cutting (300 cpm) was performed to obtain specimens for cytology and histopathology. Results: Diagnostic material was obtained in nine of 10 (90%) cases. Diagnoses included iris naevus, iris stroma, malignant melanoma, melanocytoma, epithelial inclusion cyst, and sarcoid granuloma. All corneal wounds were self sealing. One patient developed a transient postoperative increase in intraocular pressure. Within the follow up of this study, no patients suffered intraocular haemorrhage, infection, cataract or vision loss. Conclusion: The Finger iridectomy technique was a minimally invasive and very effective biopsy technique. Aspiration cutting yielded relatively large pieces of tissue (and cells) used for cytopathological and histopathological evaluation. Small incision surgery allowed for rapid rehabilitation and no significant complications.
Bibliography:href:bjophthalmol-89-946.pdf
local:0890946
ark:/67375/NVC-9N9L699V-R
istex:354E4615BB2CB912FBE405C0BA835B16C42B6B05
Correspondence to: Paul T Finger MD, FACS, The New York Eye Cancer Center,115 East 61st Street, New York City, NY 10021, USA; pfinger@eyecancer.com
PMID:16024840
ObjectType-Case Study-3
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-2
The authors have no proprietary interest in the equipment used in this study.
Correspondence to: …Paul T Finger …MD, FACS, The New York Eye Cancer Center,115 East 61st Street, New York City, NY 10021, USA; pfinger@eyecancer.com
Supported by The EyeCare Foundation, Research to Prevent Blindness, and The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary Research Fund, New York City, New York, USA.
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.2004.062653