Pre-departure Integration Strategies in the European Union: Integration or Immigration Policy?

AbstractSeveral States require immigrants from outside the EU to participate in language or integration courses after arrival. In recent years, some EU Member States made passing a language test (Netherlands and Germany) or participating in a language course (France) a condition for a visa for famil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of migration and law Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 1 - 30
Main Author: Groenendijk, Kees
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: The Netherlands Brill | Nijhoff 2011
Martinus Nijhoff
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AbstractSeveral States require immigrants from outside the EU to participate in language or integration courses after arrival. In recent years, some EU Member States made passing a language test (Netherlands and Germany) or participating in a language course (France) a condition for a visa for family reunification for immigrants from certain third countries. Denmark and the UK introduced a similar requirement in 2010. The focus of his article is on three aspects: the political debate, the legal constraints and the effects. Firstly, the development of the pre-departure integration strategies is analyzed. What was the rationale behind the introduction and does is vary between Member States? Secondly, the legal constraints of EU and international law are discussed. Finally, the results of the first studies evaluating this policy instrument are presented. Is pre-departure a good predictor for immigrant’s ability to integrate? Does it actually assist integration, and what are the unexpected or counterproductive effects?
Bibliography:ark:/67375/JKT-PSC113M1-5
href:15718166_013_01_s001_text.pdf
istex:19D5E9D06D72E47B5CE40C5952DF53BFAC945750
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1388-364X
1571-8166
DOI:10.1163/157181611X558191