Effects of air pollution on symptoms and peak expiratory flow measurements in subjects with obstructive airways disease

• Published in: Thorax Vol. 50; no. 2; pp. 149 - 155
• Main Authors: Higgins, B G, Francis, H C, Yates, C J, Warburton, C J, Fletcher, A M, Reid, J A, Pickering, C A, Woodcock, A A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society 01-02-1995; BMJ; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Air Pollutants - adverse effects; Biological and medical sciences; Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma; Dyspnea - physiopathology; Female; Humans; Lung Diseases, Obstructive - drug therapy; Lung Diseases, Obstructive - physiopathology; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate; Pneumology; Respiratory Sounds - physiopathology; Lung volume; Human; Symptomatology; Chronic; Correlation; Respiratory disease; Maximum expiratory flow rate; Exploration; Air pollution; Obstructive pulmonary disease; Asthma
• ISSN: 0040-6376; 1468-3296
• DOI: 10.1136/thx.50.2.149

BACKGROUND--Evidence from laboratory studies suggests that air pollution can produce bronchoconstriction and respiratory symptoms in selected subjects, but the relevance of these findings to exposure to natural pollution is unclear. This study was performed to determine whether air pollution at typical levels found in the UK has demonstrable effects on respiratory function and symptoms in subjects with airways disease. METHODS--Seventy five adult patients with diagnoses of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were studied for a period of four weeks during which they kept records of their peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates, symptoms (wheeze, dyspnoea, cough, throat and eye irritation), and bronchodilator use. Thirty six patients in whom the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 was below 12.25 mumol were classified as reactors. Ambient air pollution was measured with absorption spectroscopy. RESULTS--There were modest but significant increases in PEF variability, bronchodilator use, and wheeze with increasing sulphur dioxide levels; bronchodilator use, dyspnoea, eye irritation, and minimum PEF readings were related to ozone levels. In the subgroup of reactors falls in mean and minimum peak flow and increases in wheeze, dyspnoea, and bronchodilator use were associated with increases in levels of both sulphur dioxide and ozone. Some associations were seen with pollution levels on the same day, but for others the pollution effects appeared to be delayed by 24 or 48 hours. Pollution levels did not breach the WHO guide levels during the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS--Increases in environmental levels of ozone and sulphur dioxide are associated with adverse changes in peak flow measurements and both ocular and respiratory symptoms in subjects with obstructive airways disease. Although the peak flow and symptom changes were modest, they occurred at pollution levels below current WHO guide levels.