Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 7; no. 11; p. e017612
• Main Authors: Farnbach, Sara, Evans, John, Eades, Anne-Marie, Gee, Graham, Fernando, Jamie, Hammond, Belinda, Simms, Matty, DeMasi, Karrina, Hackett, Maree
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01-11-2017; BMJ Publishing Group
• Subjects: Australia; Culturally Competent Care; Data collection; Depression - diagnosis; Ethics; Female; Health Services, Indigenous - organization & administration; Humans; Male; Mass Screening - methods; Medical research; Medical screening; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Mental health; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander - psychology; Native peoples; Primary Health Care - standards; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Public health; Qualitative Research; Research Design; Researchers; Systematic review; Theory; Validation studies; Validity; Values; Australia; primary care; qualitative research; mental health; public health
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017612

IntroductionProcess evaluations are conducted alongside research projects to identify the context, impact and consequences of research, determine whether it was conducted per protocol and to understand how, why and for whom an intervention is effective. We present a process evaluation protocol for the Getting it Right research project, which aims to determine validity of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. In this process evaluation, we aim to: (1) explore the context, impact and consequences of conducting Getting It Right, (2) explore primary healthcare staff and community representatives’ experiences with the research project, (3) determine if it was conducted per protocol and (4) explore experiences with the depression screening tool, including perceptions about how it could be implemented into practice (if found to be valid). We also describe the partnerships established to conduct this process evaluation and how the national Values and Ethics: Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research is met.Methods and analysisRealist and grounded theory approaches are used. Qualitative data include semistructured interviews with primary healthcare staff and community representatives involved with Getting it Right. Iterative data collection and analysis will inform a coding framework. Interviews will continue until saturation of themes is reached, or all participants are considered. Data will be triangulated against administrative data and patient feedback. An Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Group guides this research. Researchers will be blinded from validation data outcomes for as long as is feasible.Ethics and disseminationThe University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee, Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales and six state ethics committees have approved this research. Findings will be submitted to academic journals and presented at conferences.Trial registration number ACTRN12614000705684.