Adaptation of hydrogen analysis to measure stomach to caecum transit time in the rat

Excreted hydrogen analysis was used to measure stomach to caecum transit time of the head of a test meal in 120 rats fed by gavage. Results were compared with the distribution of a labelled test meal in the gastrointestinal tract of rats killed at different time intervals after gavage. Values for st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gut Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 849 - 854
Main Authors: Brown, N J, Rumsey, R D, Read, N W
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology 01-07-1987
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Excreted hydrogen analysis was used to measure stomach to caecum transit time of the head of a test meal in 120 rats fed by gavage. Results were compared with the distribution of a labelled test meal in the gastrointestinal tract of rats killed at different time intervals after gavage. Values for stomach to caecum transit were compatible with the distribution of labelled meals in 91% of animals, although in the remainder the hydrogen concentration had not risen even though food residues were in the caecum when the animals were killed. The technique gave reproducible results; the coefficients of variation for four studies carried out in each of six animals varied between 4 and 14%. A meal consisting of homogenised baked beans had a significantly shorter stomach to caecum transit time (88.1 +/- 4.5 min; mean +/- SE; n = 21; p less than 0.001) than an equivalent volume of Complan/lactulose (180.9 +/- 8.7 min; n = 13). This technique was used to investigate the effect of ileal infusion of a fat emulsion (20% Intralipid) via a chronically implanted intestinal cannula on the stomach to caecum transit time of a bean meal, in a series of paired studies carried out in six rats. Stomach to caecum transit time was significantly delayed during ileal infusion of 20% Intralipid compared with the control infusion of an isotonic saline solution (218.3 +/- 21 min v 106.7 +/- 33 min Intralipid v saline; n = 6; p less than 0.001).
Bibliography:istex:37EE4CE27D4B04BAF7429CF24595C8AA73A1336E
local:gutjnl;28/7/849
PMID:3653753
ark:/67375/NVC-D8L5GMBN-6
href:gutjnl-28-849.pdf
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
1458-3288
DOI:10.1136/gut.28.7.849