Relationship between licensing, registration, and other gun sales laws and the source state of crime guns
Objective—To determine the association between licensing and registration of firearm sales and an indicator of gun availability to criminals. Methods—Tracing data on all crime guns recovered in 25 cities in the United States were used to estimate the relationship between state gun law categories and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Injury prevention Vol. 7; no. 3; pp. 184 - 189 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
01-09-2001
BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Group |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective—To determine the association between licensing and registration of firearm sales and an indicator of gun availability to criminals. Methods—Tracing data on all crime guns recovered in 25 cities in the United States were used to estimate the relationship between state gun law categories and the proportion of crime guns first sold by in-state gun dealers. Results—In cities located in states with both mandatory registration and licensing systems (five cities), a mean of 33.7% of crime guns were first sold by in-state gun dealers, compared with 72.7% in cities that had either registration or licensing but not both (seven cities), and 84.2% in cities without registration or licensing (13 cites). Little of the difference between cities with both licensing and registration and cities with neither licensing nor registration was explained by potential confounders. The share of the population near a city that resides in a neighboring state without licensing or registration laws was negatively associated with the outcome. Conclusion—States with registration and licensing systems appear to do a better job than other states of keeping guns initially sold within the state from being recovered in crimes. Proximity to states without these laws, however, may limit their impact. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | PMID:11565981 Correspondence to: Daniel W Webster, Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Rm 593, Baltimore, MD 21205–1996, USA dwebster@jhsph.edu istex:CD77F945A6743843A099122630DDDD3160C79003 ark:/67375/NVC-CTV86BG0-C href:injuryprev-7-184.pdf local:0070184 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1353-8047 1475-5785 |
DOI: | 10.1136/ip.7.3.184 |