On Zhongyong Rationality: The Confucian Doctrine of the Mean as a Missing Link between Instrumental Rationality and Communicative Rationality
An exploration of the importance of the Confucian precept of zhongyong to the project of modernity argues that this Confucian doctrine of the mean also represents a rational mode of action. The zhongyong presumption of a holistic perspective is seen as likely to provide a socio-psychological impetus...
Saved in:
Published in: | Asian Journal of Social Science Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 107 - 127 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Netherlands
BRILL
2003
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | An exploration of the importance of the Confucian precept of zhongyong to the project of modernity argues that this Confucian doctrine of the mean also represents a rational mode of action. The zhongyong presumption of a holistic perspective is seen as likely to provide a socio-psychological impetus for rational communication. Theoretical discourses on rationality & modernity by the Enlightenment thinkers, Max Weber, & the Frankfurt School are reviewed along with Jurgen Habermas's construct of communicative rationality. Special attention is given to the close identification of zhongyong rationality with the moral principles of Confucianism & its problematical role in conflict resolution. An empirical study of conflict resolution in the rural People's Republic of China that analyzes 150 cases of disputes about the management of village affairs is examined to support the argument that the relationship between zhongyong & the substantive oral principles of Confucianism is not necessarily intrinsic. It is concluded that, by displacing efficiency with temperance, zhongyong allows the actor to consider collective interests as equal to his/her own, thereby promoting the Confucian value of harmonious co-existence without renouncing instrumental reason. 49 References. J. Lindroth |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/JKT-VXPCRM9G-L href:15685314_031_01_s008_text.pdf istex:93BE0AA57107BF6E209A71D6D253C05F0EB467DB ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1568-4849 1568-5314 2212-3857 1568-4849 |
DOI: | 10.1163/156853103764778559 |