Sample size determination in geotechnical site investigation considering spatial variation and correlation

Site investigation is a fundamental element in geotechnical engineering practice, but only a small portion of geomaterials is sampled and tested during site investigation. This leads to a question of sample size determination: how many samples are needed to achieve a target level of accuracy for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian geotechnical journal Vol. 56; no. 7; pp. 992 - 1002
Main Authors: Wang, Yu, Guan, Zheng, Zhao, Tengyuan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Ottawa NRC Research Press 01-07-2019
Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Site investigation is a fundamental element in geotechnical engineering practice, but only a small portion of geomaterials is sampled and tested during site investigation. This leads to a question of sample size determination: how many samples are needed to achieve a target level of accuracy for the results inferred from the samples? Sample size determination is a well-known topic in statistics and has many applications in a wide variety of areas. However, conventional statistical methods, which mainly deal with independent data, only have limited applications in geotechnical site investigation because geotechnical data are not independent, but spatially varying and correlated. Existing design codes around the world (e.g., Eurocode 7) only provide conceptual principles on sample size determination. No scientific or quantitative method is available for sample size determination in site investigation considering spatial variation and correlation of geotechnical properties. This study performs an extensive parametric study and develops a statistical chart for sample size determination with consideration of spatial variation and correlation using Bayesian compressive sensing or sampling. Real cone penetration test data and real laboratory test data are used to illustrate application of the proposed statistical chart, and the method is shown to perform well.
AbstractList Site investigation is a fundamental element in geotechnical engineering practice, but only a small portion of geomaterials is sampled and tested during site investigation. This leads to a question of sample size determination: how many samples are needed to achieve a target level of accuracy for the results inferred from the samples? Sample size determination is a well-known topic in statistics and has many applications in a wide variety of areas. However, conventional statistical methods, which mainly deal with independent data, only have limited applications in geotechnical site investigation because geotechnical data are not independent, but spatially varying and correlated. Existing design codes around the world (e.g., Eurocode 7) only provide conceptual principles on sample size determination. No scientific or quantitative method is available for sample size determination in site investigation considering spatial variation and correlation of geotechnical properties. This study performs an extensive parametric study and develops a statistical chart for sample size determination with consideration of spatial variation and correlation using Bayesian compressive sensing or sampling. Real cone penetration test data and real laboratory test data are used to illustrate application of the proposed statistical chart, and the method is shown to perform well.
Site investigation is a fundamental element in geotechnical engineering practice, but only a small portion of geomaterials is sampled and tested during site investigation. This leads to a question of sample size determination: how many samples are needed to achieve a target level of accuracy for the results inferred from the samples? Sample size determination is a well-known topic in statistics and has many applications in a wide variety of areas. However, conventional statistical methods, which mainly deal with independent data, only have limited applications in geotechnical site investigation because geotechnical data are not independent, but spatially varying and correlated. Existing design codes around the world (e.g., Eurocode 7) only provide conceptual principles on sample size determination. No scientific or quantitative method is available for sample size determination in site investigation considering spatial variation and correlation of geotechnical properties. This study performs an extensive parametric study and develops a statistical chart for sample size determination with consideration of spatial variation and correlation using Bayesian compressive sensing or sampling. Real cone penetration test data and real laboratory test data are used to illustrate application of the proposed statistical chart, and the method is shown to perform well. Key words: geotechnical site investigation, sample size, Bayesian method, compressive sensing, random field. L'etude du site est un element fondamental de la pratique de l'ingenierie geotechnique, mais seule une petite partie des geomateriaux est echantillonnee et testee au cours de l'etude du site. Cela conduit a une question de determination de la taille de l'echantillon : combien faut-il d'echantillons pour atteindre un niveau cible d'exactitude pour les resultats deduits des echantillons? La determination de la taille des echantillons est un sujet bien connu en statistique et a de nombreuses applications dans de nombreux domaines. Cependant, les methodes statistiques conventionnelles, qui traitent principalement de donnees independantes, n'ont que des applications limitees dans l'etude geotechnique de sites, car les donnees geotechniques ne sont pas independantes, mais varient dans l'espace et en correlation. Les codes de conception existants dans le monde (Eurocode 7, par exemple) ne fournissent que des principes conceptuels pour la determination de la taille de l'echantillon. Aucune methode scientifique ou quantitative n'est disponible pour la determination de la taille de l'echantillon dans l'etude du site, compte tenu de la variation spatiale et de la correlation des proprietes geotechniques. Cette etude realise une evaluation parametrique approfondie et developpe un tableau statistique pour la determination de la taille de l'echantillon en prenant en compte la variation et la correlation spatiales a l'aide de la detection ou de l'echantillonnage bayesien en compression. Les donnees des tests de penetration au cone reel et les donnees des tests de laboratoire reels sont utilisees pour illustrer l'application du diagramme statistique propose, et il est demontre que la methode donne de bons resultats. [Traduit par la Redaction] Mots-cles: etude geotechnique du site, taille de l'echantillon, methode bayesienne, detection de compression, champ aleatoire.
Abstract_FL L’étude du site est un élément fondamental de la pratique de l’ingénierie géotechnique, mais seule une petite partie des géomatériaux est échantillonnée et testée au cours de l’étude du site. Cela conduit à une question de détermination de la taille de l’échantillon : combien faut-il d’échantillons pour atteindre un niveau cible d’exactitude pour les résultats déduits des échantillons? La détermination de la taille des échantillons est un sujet bien connu en statistique et a de nombreuses applications dans de nombreux domaines. Cependant, les méthodes statistiques conventionnelles, qui traitent principalement de données indépendantes, n’ont que des applications limitées dans l’étude géotechnique de sites, car les données géotechniques ne sont pas indépendantes, mais varient dans l’espace et en corrélation. Les codes de conception existants dans le monde (Eurocode 7, par exemple) ne fournissent que des principes conceptuels pour la détermination de la taille de l’échantillon. Aucune méthode scientifique ou quantitative n’est disponible pour la détermination de la taille de l’échantillon dans l’étude du site, compte tenu de la variation spatiale et de la corrélation des propriétés géotechniques. Cette étude réalise une évaluation paramétrique approfondie et développe un tableau statistique pour la détermination de la taille de l’échantillon en prenant en compte la variation et la corrélation spatiales à l’aide de la détection ou de l’échantillonnage bayésien en compression. Les données des tests de pénétration au cône réel et les données des tests de laboratoire réels sont utilisées pour illustrer l’application du diagramme statistique proposé, et il est démontré que la méthode donne de bons résultats. [Traduit par la Rédaction]
Audience Academic
Author Wang, Yu
Zhao, Tengyuan
Guan, Zheng
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yu
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Yu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Zheng
  surname: Guan
  fullname: Guan, Zheng
  organization: Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Tengyuan
  surname: Zhao
  fullname: Zhao, Tengyuan
  organization: Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
BookMark eNqV0s1LHDEUAPAgFrpaj70P9uRhbL7HHEW0CtJCbc8hk3kZs8xkxiQr2r_ebLdQhYFSckjy8nv54h2g_TAFQOgjwaeEMPXZ9uuaYnJWY97wPbQiFJ_VEhO8j1YYlzGTDX-PDlJaY0w4p3SF1ndmnAeokv8FVQcZ4uiDyX4KlQ9VD1MGex-8NUMhGUrwEVL2_Y7YKSTfQfShr9JcYoU9muh3qyZ0RcQIw-_5B_TOmSHB0Z_-EP28uvxxcV3ffvtyc3F-WxuhRK5lawXjpOVSOdUKBpYJ6bjCwrKmFZQwbix1ippOSQLAJVgi25YT4ih2DTtEn3b7znF62JTb6vW0iaEcqSkVWDREcfZX9WYA7YObcjR29Mnqc6HK5yhKZFH1guohQDRD-X3nS_iNP17wdvYP-jU6XUCldTB6u7jryZuEYjI85d5sUtI3d9__w35dfJ2NU0oRnJ6jH0181gTrbUnpUlJ6W1J6W1LF450P0UZIYKK9_0fKC9clzW8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compgeo_2020_103898
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compgeo_2021_104504
crossref_primary_10_1139_cgj_2023_0289
crossref_primary_10_1139_cgj_2020_0440
crossref_primary_10_1139_cgj_2020_0640
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tust_2020_103771
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrmge_2021_09_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrmge_2022_01_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_conbuildmat_2023_134519
crossref_primary_10_1080_17499518_2023_2188464
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compgeo_2023_106064
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2022_108377
crossref_primary_10_1080_17499518_2021_1971258
crossref_primary_10_1680_jgeot_18_P_315
crossref_primary_10_1139_cgj_2022_0356
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enggeo_2020_105711
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrmge_2023_02_024
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture12071045
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soildyn_2021_106710
crossref_primary_10_2478_amns_2023_2_01155
crossref_primary_10_1061_JGGEFK_GTENG_12408
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compgeo_2020_103681
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enggeo_2021_106348
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2023_109476
crossref_primary_10_1139_cgj_2019_0131
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_6450780
Cites_doi 10.1137/1.9781611970104
10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.017
10.1002/9781118398050
10.1002/nme.255
10.1002/9780470517277
10.1002/cpa.20124
10.1080/17499518.2016.1265653
10.1109/TIT.2007.909108
10.1002/9780470284704
10.1139/cgj-2016-0218
10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000723
10.1016/0167-4730(86)90002-0
10.1061/AJGEB6.0000517
10.1139/cgj-2015-0545
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:10(1704)
10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:12(2660)
10.1139/cgj-2013-0478
10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.018
10.1109/TSP.2007.914345
10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.10.019
10.1016/j.sandf.2018.05.002
10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.005
10.1139/cgj-2017-0219
10.1080/17499510701697377
10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.009
10.1016/0148-9062(70)90013-6
10.1080/17499518.2016.1235711
10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.04.042
10.1109/TSP.2008.2005866
10.1680/jgeot.16.P.143
10.1139/cgj-2017-0254
10.1139/t99-038
10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.03.023
10.1177/001316447003000308
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2019 NRC Research Press
2019 Published by NRC Research Press
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 NRC Research Press
– notice: 2019 Published by NRC Research Press
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
ISN
ISR
7TG
7UA
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H96
KL.
KR7
L.G
DOI 10.1139/cgj-2018-0474
DatabaseName CrossRef
Gale In Context: Canada
Gale in Context: Science
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Water Resources Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
Technology Research Database
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList

CrossRef



Civil Engineering Abstracts


DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Statistics
EISSN 1208-6010
EndPage 1002
ExternalDocumentID A594429216
10_1139_cgj_2018_0474
cgj-2018-0474
GroupedDBID 02
08R
0R
1AW
29B
2XV
3V.
4.4
4P2
4S
5GY
5RP
88I
8AF
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FQ
AAIKC
ABDBF
ABJCF
ABPTK
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
AENEX
AFKRA
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ARCSS
AZQEC
BCR
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKSAR
BLC
BPHCQ
CAG
COF
CS3
D8U
DU5
DWQXO
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBS
ECC
EDH
EDO
EJD
EMK
EPL
ESX
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
HZ
H~9
I-F
IAO
ICQ
IEA
IGS
IOF
ISN
ISR
ITC
L6V
L7B
L8X
LK5
M2P
M2Q
M3C
M3G
M7R
M7S
MM-
MV1
NMEPN
NRXXU
NYCZX
O9-
OVD
P2P
PCBAR
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
PTHSS
QF4
QM1
QN7
QO4
QRP
RIG
RRCRK
RRP
RWL
SJN
TAE
TUS
U5U
X
XHC
-~X
..I
.4S
.DC
00T
0R~
6J9
AAMNW
AAYXX
ABJNI
ACGFO
ADNWM
AEGXH
AIAGR
CCPQU
CITATION
DATHI
HZ~
IPNFZ
ONR
P-S
PV9
RZL
TEORI
VQG
~02
ML.
7TG
7UA
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H96
KL.
KR7
L.G
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a595t-6bc5341b469f9b53ec356f4905c37b52134ac2f92ad961ee46ec16bb411f20f73
ISSN 0008-3674
IngestDate Sun Nov 10 05:04:30 EST 2024
Tue Nov 19 21:24:15 EST 2024
Thu Nov 14 21:12:27 EST 2024
Tue Dec 12 21:18:13 EST 2023
Tue Nov 12 22:50:16 EST 2024
Thu Aug 01 20:28:24 EDT 2024
Thu Aug 01 19:14:45 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 22:29:28 EST 2024
Wed Nov 11 00:35:13 EST 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a595t-6bc5341b469f9b53ec356f4905c37b52134ac2f92ad961ee46ec16bb411f20f73
PQID 2250571943
PQPubID 47495
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A594429216
gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A594429216
proquest_journals_2250571943
gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A594429216
gale_infotraccpiq_594429216
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A594429216
nrcresearch_primary_10_1139_cgj_2018_0474
gale_infotracmisc_A594429216
crossref_primary_10_1139_cgj_2018_0474
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Ottawa
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Ottawa
PublicationTitle Canadian geotechnical journal
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher NRC Research Press
Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press
Publisher_xml – name: NRC Research Press
– name: Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press
References refg40/ref40
refg20/ref20
refg22/ref22
refg36/ref36
refg38/ref38
Vanmarcke E.H. (refg32/ref32) 1977; 103
refg31/ref31
refg9/ref9
refg11/ref11
refg25/ref25
refg6/ref6
refg15/ref15
refg29/ref29
refg43/ref43
refg34/ref34
refg26/ref26
refg14/ref14
refg5/ref5
refg2/ref2
refg23/ref23
refg37/ref37
refg17/ref17
refg30/ref30
refg21/ref21
refg7/ref7
refg4/ref4
refg10/ref10
refg12/ref12
refg1/ref1
refg28/ref28
refg41/ref41
refg35/ref35
refg39/ref39
refg3/ref3
refg42/ref42
refg44/ref44
refg24/ref24
refg16/ref16
refg33/ref33
refg13/ref13
refg27/ref27
References_xml – ident: refg11/ref11
  doi: 10.1137/1.9781611970104
– ident: refg36/ref36
  doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.017
– ident: refg1/ref1
  doi: 10.1002/9781118398050
– ident: refg17/ref17
  doi: 10.1002/nme.255
– ident: refg39/ref39
  doi: 10.1002/9780470517277
– ident: refg7/ref7
– ident: refg26/ref26
– ident: refg5/ref5
  doi: 10.1002/cpa.20124
– ident: refg28/ref28
  doi: 10.1080/17499518.2016.1265653
– ident: refg31/ref31
  doi: 10.1109/TIT.2007.909108
– ident: refg13/ref13
  doi: 10.1002/9780470284704
– ident: refg24/ref24
  doi: 10.1139/cgj-2016-0218
– ident: refg25/ref25
  doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246
– ident: refg30/ref30
  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000723
– ident: refg33/ref33
  doi: 10.1016/0167-4730(86)90002-0
– volume: 103
  start-page: 1227
  issue: 11
  year: 1977
  ident: refg32/ref32
  publication-title: Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE
  doi: 10.1061/AJGEB6.0000517
  contributor:
    fullname: Vanmarcke E.H.
– ident: refg34/ref34
  doi: 10.1139/cgj-2015-0545
– ident: refg3/ref3
  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:10(1704)
– ident: refg12/ref12
  doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
– ident: refg41/ref41
  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:12(2660)
– ident: refg14/ref14
  doi: 10.1139/cgj-2013-0478
– ident: refg6/ref6
  doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.018
– ident: refg20/ref20
  doi: 10.1109/TSP.2007.914345
– ident: refg37/ref37
  doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.10.019
– ident: refg42/ref42
  doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2018.05.002
– ident: refg15/ref15
  doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.005
– ident: refg44/ref44
  doi: 10.1139/cgj-2017-0219
– ident: refg16/ref16
  doi: 10.1080/17499510701697377
– ident: refg4/ref4
  doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.009
– ident: refg40/ref40
  doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(70)90013-6
– ident: refg27/ref27
  doi: 10.1080/17499518.2016.1235711
– ident: refg43/ref43
  doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.04.042
– ident: refg21/ref21
  doi: 10.1109/TSP.2008.2005866
– ident: refg23/ref23
– ident: refg35/ref35
  doi: 10.1680/jgeot.16.P.143
– ident: refg38/ref38
  doi: 10.1139/cgj-2017-0254
– ident: refg29/ref29
  doi: 10.1139/t99-038
– ident: refg9/ref9
– ident: refg10/ref10
  doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.03.023
– ident: refg22/ref22
  doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308
– ident: refg2/ref2
SSID ssj0014422
Score 2.4412613
Snippet Site investigation is a fundamental element in geotechnical engineering practice, but only a small portion of geomaterials is sampled and tested during site...
SourceID proquest
gale
crossref
nrcresearch
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 992
SubjectTerms Accuracy
Bayesian analysis
Bayesian method
Building codes
champ aléatoire
Compression
Compression tests
compressive sensing
Cone penetration tests
Correlation
Correlation analysis
détection de compression
Engineering
Geomaterials
Geotechnical data
Geotechnical engineering
geotechnical site investigation
Geotechnology
Investigations
Laboratory tests
méthode bayésienne
Probability theory
Questions
random field
Sample size
Samples
Site planning
Size determination
Soil properties
Spatial variations
Statistical methods
Statistics
Studies
taille de l’échantillon
Variation
étude géotechnique du site
Title Sample size determination in geotechnical site investigation considering spatial variation and correlation
URI http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/cgj-2018-0474
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2250571943
Volume 56
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELe68bI9IBggxgqyEBpCKNAkzocfq61TB6hCa5GAFytxnK57SEfbTBp_PXexk9lifD3wElX2ybZ8P5_t693PhLwYDIqkCGWGKcqRx0LGvTyPc1jxRZmmEfNLH3OHx9Nk8jk9HrFRr9e-1HRT9l81DWWga8yc_Qdtd41CAfwGncMXtA7fv9L7NEO-39frxXfMiDKxLm1E41wtNWlrkwsJp00o7Hg2lhiRrp_vbJwMGGsNYldwm9a1OgVutTLxc_a5tiM5cHqwB9w47bVh-VJ3UT-19r9-PVdmB9U-7MZ_O4Oy69qg1zgmmlwo2zHRddwaKcuvNjk76iILnVgTbaNTL4z12z1vlDbLAZTh1dG225qQ3OAzsYww16_rmf0cOWZv3ytCpFqV8wvAj596A9Z2aXNyj4dT8fH4RHw4nbzfIncCMGdoTafvJt1_VYwZTnoz7pbJNeRvncadk4_Z_3erlTSsTuc_nQaaI87sHrlr7iZ0qEF1n_RUtUd2LcbKPbKDlxPN7f2AXGisUcQadbBGFxW1kUARa9TBGrWwRg3WaIc1ClijFtYekk8no9nR2DNvd3hZxKONF-cyggNSzmJe8jwKlQyjuGR8EMkwySPkEcxkUPIgK3jsK8ViJf04z5nvl8GgTMJHZLtaVuoxoZEEY5JIlfKCsSJJM9iGUlX4MpdlHAdsnxy28youNUWLaK62IRegAIEKEKiAffIcZ10g7UmFcVXzrF6vxel0IoYRZ_hwmx__UujMEXpphMrlZpXJzOSywICRTs2RPHAk5eXim7BqD53auaaav62ZviMIe4B0ql9ZQPrTLPRbmAljBtYiwJtQ4nMWPvl99QHZuVnrfbK9WdXqKdlaF_WzZlX8AOtP6CM
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27933,27934
linkProvider Multiple Vendors
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sample+size+determination+in+geotechnical+site+investigation+considering+spatial+variation+and+correlation&rft.jtitle=Canadian+geotechnical+journal&rft.au=Wang%2C+Yu&rft.au=Guan%2C+Zheng&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Tengyuan&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.pub=Canadian+Science+Publishing+NRC+Research+Press&rft.issn=0008-3674&rft.eissn=1208-6010&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=992&rft.epage=1002&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139%2Fcgj-2018-0474&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0008-3674&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0008-3674&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0008-3674&client=summon